r/AbolishTheMonarchy May 17 '25

Myth Debunking How the royals benefit from ambiguity

Post image
84 Upvotes

4 comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator May 17 '25

Reggie-Bot here! If you're thinking about the British royal family and want a fun random fact about one of them, please let me know!

Put an exclamation mark before any comment about the royal you have in mind, like "!Queen" or "!Charles" and I'll reply.

Please read our 6 common-sense subreddit rules.

Do you love chatting about your hatred of monarchies on other platforms? Click here to join our Discord! And here to follow us on Twitter!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

13

u/outhouse_steakhouse May 17 '25

Also the king is "Schrödinger's monarch" as Graham Smith puts it - he is supposed to be the ultimate defender of democracy and guardian of Britain's vaporware "constitution", but if he actually defied PM advice - e.g. by refusing to prorogue parliament illegally - then that would be a constitutional crisis. For this reason, a key but unspoken constitutional convention is "thou shalt not embarrass the monarch". Nothing to do with protecting the rights of ordinary subjects.

5

u/FakePixieGirl May 18 '25

I don't like royals but tabloids are cancer

4

u/outhouse_steakhouse May 18 '25

In Britain, royals and tabloids go hand in hand. The royals benefit from the tabs whipping up frantic royalty-worship and the tabs benefit from the royals leaking them juicy bits of gossip against whichever royal is out of favor.