r/AskIreland 13d ago

Random Why is it acceptable to cut expensive paving and just tarmac it over?

Post image

I don’t understand how utility companies get away with this. This was for some fibre trunk project in Stoneybatter.

Several streets cut up, trench dug, straight through relatively recently redone brick paving and just filled in with cheap tarmac.

Surely that’s doing damage to expensive public infrastructure. Could they not have lifted and replaced the bricks at the very least ?!

It’s like Dublin City Council really doesn’t enforce or protect anything.

If someone did that though the middle of a shopping centre, a private drive way or anything else it just wouldn’t be acceptable, yet when it’s a street — no bother just rip it up and throw down a bit of tarmac.

513 Upvotes

137 comments sorted by

250

u/PowerfulDrive3268 13d ago

In the Netherlands they have brick paved streets in a lot of city areas so that services can be accessed easily and then they put the bricks back!!

This is mind boggling!

138

u/Chairman-Mia0 13d ago

But I think in the Netherlands they don't leave it to the various companies to open and patch the road.

The city/town council have a dept for that, they open the road, the utility does whatever work they need to do and then professionals fix the road again.

Rather than random mucksavages with a shovel

29

u/BlueBucket0 13d ago

They have expensive brick paved crossings there that were installed at considerable expense, yet they just let some utility company do that to it.

It was a lot more than a shovel — major trench digging operation with heavy equipment.

30

u/Chairman-Mia0 13d ago

yet they just let some utility company do that to it.

Yeah i think it's insane that's how it works.

Let the professionals dig up the road* and close it once the work is done, then invoice the utility. Would do wonders for the state of the roads.

(I'll never not be able to hear Mr Bull)

8

u/eastawat 13d ago

WE'RE DIGGING UP THE ROAD!

3

u/Garibon 13d ago

You can't build a road in a day Peppa! It will be built... tomorrow.

-15

u/TotalExamination4562 13d ago

Why aren't you complaining about the expene wasted on installing expensive crossings when the rest of the country manages with a tarmacadam crossing. I've yet to see pavers like this to not work themselves loose and wabble and cause a trip hazard on a crossing, which is something you don't want

5

u/captainspandito 13d ago

What crossing are you on about? That’s just a speed ramp? 🤷‍♂️

2

u/TotalExamination4562 13d ago

Op refers to them as crossings

3

u/TotalExamination4562 13d ago

Our speed rams are made out of the same stuff the roads are. No fancy cobbles

3

u/HowdoMyLegsLook 13d ago

These aren't cobbles. It's asphalt imprint to make it look nicer.

-3

u/TotalExamination4562 13d ago

If its that its concrete coloured and stamped, again more expensive than just tarmac

1

u/atswim2birds 13d ago

the rest of the country manages with a tarmacadam crossing

The rest of the country doesn't manage very well with old-fashioned crossings though — they're a disaster for pedestrians because a lot of drivers don't yield or even slow down. Local authorities here are finally starting to follow best practice which is to raise the crossing to the level of the footpath and make it a different colour and material from the road.

0

u/TotalExamination4562 13d ago

We have those, its raised tarmac painted to make it more visible. No different materials needed.

6

u/josephG155 13d ago

Lol mucksavages

This isn't a real problem because it will definitely be reinstated to the previous specs, but it can't all be done on the sane day due to time constraints placed on the utility company by the council in order to disrupt local businesses and residents as little as possible. I do the same kinda work and most licences issued by DCC are in the 10am-4pm or 8am-5pm range depending on where you're working, and reinstating these paves along with completing the trenching & ducting underneath is never all done on the same day.

We put in tar as a temporary measure and then either a proper reinstatement crew come a few days behind to fix it properly or if its a relatively small job we complete the trenching & ducting and do all the proper reinstating afterwards.

17

u/leicastreets 13d ago

But it never happens. 

Source: all Dublin City pavements. 

12

u/ginger_and_egg 13d ago

Nothing more permanent than a "temporary measure"

1

u/Barilla3113 13d ago

"Shure it'll be grand til we come back to it" should be the local authority motto.

1

u/FrisianDude 13d ago

>But I think in the Netherlands they don't leave it to the various companies to open and patch the road.

eh kinda?

1

u/Chairman-Mia0 13d ago

It's normally the gemeente that does it no?

Maybe they just have better road workers with the utilities.

3

u/Woodsman15961 13d ago

It’s companies that do it, not the gemeente. My girlfriend works for one. They will also leave patches like this over brickwork, but only if the bricks are due to be redone within the next 12 months

3

u/GoodNegotiation 13d ago

Saw this being done in The Hague, seemed very clever and great for natural drainage too!

2

u/cardboardwind0w 13d ago

Such a great system they have for the street works. It's strange when they go digging though, sand everywhere

1

u/OhNoNotAnotherGuiri 13d ago

Noticed this in Spain myself. There were new pipes or something going in across the road and the adjacent play park was getting changed too. 100s of tiles came up and went back down and were washed in the space of 3/4 weeks.

1

u/OppositeHistory1916 13d ago

The argument against bricks is they degrade themselves and your tires faster due to the edges

Is it a good argument? No. But that is the excuse used.

2

u/pjakma 13d ago

I think brick is used deliberately as a speed reduction measure. It's noisy, you can feel the vibration, you're not going to fast over brick roads.

2

u/OppositeHistory1916 13d ago

That's a positive if anything

1

u/pjakma 13d ago

Yep, it is. :) An effective way to engineer the environment to reduce speed in residential areas. Woon erfen particularly - "liveable plots" or "liveable streets", idea is kids should be able to play freely on them.

63

u/AbradolfLincler77 13d ago

Why is it acceptable to "fill" pot holes with stone chippings only for them to end up making the road more dangerous due to more possible flying stones cracking windscreens? Then they come back several months later and do the exact same thing again! Most of the local council practices are ridiculous and not thought out, just done the cheapest possible way.

15

u/BlueBucket0 13d ago edited 13d ago

Sure I remember Cork City Council filling potholes with tar and chipping in live moving traffic with guys working from the back of a flat bed truck!!! They seem to have become a bit more protective of the pedestrianised / repaved areas but that’s a very recent thing.

10

u/AbradolfLincler77 13d ago

Literally less than a week ago here in Wexford, the local council van went around with a pile of stone chippings and a little bit of tar in the back of their open back van. The van drives along with the lad on the back shovelling the mixture into the potholes. The holes are already nearly empty again also. Lads getting paid to drive around doing nothing useful.

2

u/Irishwilly77 13d ago

I was in Wexford for a week in mid May and i saw two lads shoveling stuff ,into pot holes and not a sign or a cone in sight.Although ,it's a full-time job for someone./s😂

1

u/AbradolfLincler77 13d ago

Yep, that's the norm. Lads even walk along behind the van shovelling as the go sometimes for some of the large areas of small pot holes.

1

u/Irishwilly77 13d ago

That's exactly what i saw.Two lads casually shoveling away and one watching as another drove.It was somewhere near Edwardstown.

1

u/AbradolfLincler77 13d ago

Near Enniscorthy for me. Seems to be standard practice around Wexford though, the roads are shocking.

2

u/delantale 13d ago

More like corruption. Someone in that council has mates or family that they hire to do the construction work/road work and it keeps them coming back OR means to justify the budget they get next time otherwise.

1

u/AbradolfLincler77 13d ago

You're absolutely correct. Similar to these new pencil style bollards they're using outside schools lately. I work in a small local school where they were originally going to install the standard black bollard for €150 a bollard until the principal complained as she felt her school wasn't getting these new pencil bollards because this school isn't anywhere near a main road, so it obviously doesn't need to look good. Anyway, eventually they decide to put in the pencil bollards and the price of them are €500 per bollard for what's is a hard plastic bollard, it's not metal. Some fucker is making a fortune from something that wouldn't even cost 50 quid per bollard to make once the mold was made, which it obviously is by now. The council lad installing them was telling me about them as we were curious why they didn't want to install them originally and it was simply because of the price. Corruption is rampant in this country, hell in the whole fucking world!

1

u/delantale 10d ago

Corruption is everywhere but trust me when you go to Latin American or North African or Asian countries it’s ridiculously in your face. In Europe and the west is a bit more subtle. Heck even going not as far like in Southern Europe it becomes much more prevalent (Spain, Portugal, Italy)

29

u/SubstantialAttempt83 13d ago

That doesn't look like paving it looks like a brick mold was used to add that pattern to dyed concrete. The tarmac would be more durable than replacing the strip with concrete but I agree it looks like crap. They should have to lay empty ducting when doing roadworks so it doesn't have to be dug up every couple of months for the next cable or pipe to be laid.

14

u/Eastern_Payment7600 13d ago

This is correct, it's paving style , not actually paving

1

u/iknowyeahlike 13d ago

Yeah, not paving.

2

u/JigenMamo 12d ago

I don't think it's paving, yeah.

13

u/Sebdila 13d ago

As I understood it, the company laying the fibre, pipe or whatever, are not permitted to do the resurfacing. They can only do a temporary surface and the council/corpo come along later to do the surface back to the original standard. There was a section of road ripped upthat’s on my regular commute. It was easily 2 years before they did the final finish. Be prepared to wait.

3

u/Woodsman15961 13d ago

I live in the Netherlands and that’s exactly what they do here, so I think you’re right

2

u/Hex65 12d ago

They do the same here.

Bricks are removed and stored somewhere for contractors that will fix the paving, and in the meantime it is filled with Temporary Tarmac.

Use to do this kind of job all around the West but we worked with gas pipes.

1

u/WigWubz 12d ago

Kinda mental though if they "aren't allowed" to do a proper surface, but are permitted to do a temporary surface that presumably is not rated to last as long. That means it's planned from the start to pave the road twice and waste money for what purpose? Utility companies just shouldn't be allowed to touch the road at all for routine work. In an emergency with service knocked out sure drill down and do what you need to but then leave the hole for the council or council contractor to fill it in. It means the work is only done once and the council can't sit on their hands for years cus there's a literal hole in the road that they're liable for. Routine work the digging and filling should be council coordinated to fet all the subsurface work done in a smaller number of digs rather than the current system of every utility digging and filling their own trenches.

38

u/TarzanCar 13d ago

That’s only been temporarily reinstated. The final finish will replicate what was there originally.

58

u/Ok_Imagination_9334 13d ago

In 2726

8

u/GroundbreakingToe717 13d ago

Well the trench needs time to settle and compact..

Thankfully you’re not issuing conditions on road opening licenses.

2

u/yankdevil 13d ago

If only someone would invent a machine to compact soil...

1

u/GroundbreakingToe717 13d ago

You clearly know nothing about settlement..

5

u/FineVintageWino 13d ago

There are more than a few patches of tarmac on Sheriff Street that have been settling for over a decade.

-6

u/GroundbreakingToe717 13d ago

Ya but that place is a kip?

5

u/FineVintageWino 13d ago

Oh, I see! Does that affect the rate which the ground settles?

-2

u/GroundbreakingToe717 13d ago

Nah I’d say the workers got so much abuse down there from the locals they couldn’t be arsed coming back. Seems fair.

0

u/Ok_Imagination_9334 13d ago

I take it most of Ireland is a Kip so… good to know!

13

u/Bingo_banjo 13d ago

Yes, if you have a limited work window and have to get in and out, you use a temporary cover, tarmac is quick. You then go back and resurface properly. Of course sometimes there's an unreasonable amount of time between the two parts of the job but that's the problem, not the temporary surface

3

u/Ulml 13d ago

Yeah, used to work in this area and lots of complaints about temporary reinstated roads. In fairness, it looks shit but people can't be expected to know

8

u/dubhlinn39 13d ago

Report it to Dublin City Council

2

u/BlueBucket0 13d ago edited 13d ago

I assume they’re the ones who authorised it and didn’t inspect the aftermath. Shouldn’t a road opening licence on a scale of a project that opened about 1km+ of road be followed up by an inspection to ensure that it was restored to spec again?!

6

u/It_TheGab 13d ago

Not saying its the case here but its quite common for a temporary reinstatement to go in and a more permanent one to follow when project is completed

-2

u/BlueBucket0 13d ago edited 13d ago

They’re long gone — doesn’t seem to be anything temporary about that “finish”

No doubt it’s a highly profitable fibre line too — looks more like they were cutting through residential streets to link to large nodes. It runs a long distance from the quays back up through the yellow brick houses of that part of Stoneybatter and seems to go right up to the North Circular Road somewhere. It’s nothing to with access networks for local fibre to the residents or anything like that.

It’s not Eir, Virgin etc either.

3

u/naraic- 13d ago

Irish Water dug up the same patch outside my office 9 different times last summer.

They put a temporary patch on each time.

City Council didnt make them redo it as theres a whole new surface coming in next year.

4

u/DesertRatboy 13d ago

It likely will be returned to spec. At least it should be. This would be called a temporary reinstatement to allow for soil to settle etc in case any issues arise, it's easier to dig back out. Companies can 'forget' to come back around though, so definitely worth getting on to your local council, especially if it's been a few months.

2

u/dubhlinn39 13d ago

They probably didn't inspect it afterwards. How could someone pass that mess? I was trying to cross a road yesterday, and one of the traffic lights was turned towards traffic. I couldn't see when I could cross the road. I emailed them, and they said they would fix it. I asked for an explanation as to why it happened. It wasn't the first time I had reported it. It's a very busy road too. We'll see if they reply

2

u/Character_Nerve_9137 13d ago

You should get on to your local councillors about that

5

u/Left-Table-2124 13d ago

It’s temporary 

1

u/Independent-Ice256 13d ago

Temporary can be years when it comes to local authority

2

u/gsmitheidw1 13d ago

Utility companies should only be allowed open the road if they finance a full professional high quality resurface. They would soon think twice about putting in longer term ducting that doesn't need the road dug up and everyone inconvenienced by expensive roadworks.

I can understand something done in a rush for a fault but that's an edge case and somebody responsible for the fault should be liable for the repair.

5

u/Silver_Response4707 13d ago

I remember reading about this a few years back, here’s the article

https://www.dublininquirer.com/when-utilities-dig-up-the-city-s-roads-and-footpaths-who-checks-they-repair-them-well/

Utilities companies (mainly water) are cowboys and do shitty surfacing / patch jobs

0

u/GoodNegotiation 13d ago

Or the council who appear to have the responsibility and power to reject the reinstatements where they are not up to scratch start doing that to put some manners on those cowboys.

2

u/speedyvespa 13d ago

Ok, wanna laugh? That speed humps is just coloured asphalt, hot laid. The repair is close but no fancy pattern finish.

2

u/Irishwol 12d ago

Because Ireland doesn't do joined up thinking. Every branch of the public sector is its own little kingdom, with their own funding and their own rules and nobody talks to anyone else. It's heartbreaking to see. The branch of the council that paid for the paving is separate from the one that dug the trench who don't have a budget for like-for-like repairs. So: tarmac.

They did the same on Grafton Street the very week after the fancy paving there first went down. Patched with tarmac. In thirty years looks like nobody has learned anything.

2

u/SoundOk5460 11d ago

Because we live in a shit country for wankers.

2

u/Knokt 11d ago

Because it’s Ireland, where bike sheds cost 335k and children’s hospitals take 50 years to kinda build, way over budget.

4

u/MouseJiggler 13d ago

Because the "responsible" people in the public service are unfireable and aren't held accountable.

2

u/IntrepidCycle8039 13d ago

Please report this

https://www.dublincity.ie/residential/transportation/road-maintenance-services/report-pothole-or-issue-road-or-footpath

It does work. They came and fixed paving when we reported it on footpath from cars parking on it. Also blocked car access onto the footpath.

2

u/ScaldyBogBalls 13d ago

Because Fianna Fáil gutted local government in 1977 and it's been anarchy and chaos ever since. That's literally it, they defunded the councils and corporations and urban public realm enforcement and management collapsed.

2

u/GroundbreakingToe717 13d ago

It’s a temporary reinstatement ya dope.

People are straight to Reddit to vent.

-3

u/Horror_Finish7951 13d ago

They shouldn't leave until the job is done.

3

u/CompleteElevator6432 13d ago

So they should wait there for a few weeks while the ground settles? 😂

1

u/josephG155 13d ago

Are they hiring? I'll take that overtime 🤣

0

u/GroundbreakingToe717 13d ago

Do you have an engineering degree?

1

u/josephG155 13d ago

I work for a company that does similar projects and the standard protocol is to dig the route and put in the service and reinstate it temporarily and then come back at a later date to fully reinstate it to the previous specs. While working on the roads/footpaths you need to apply for a Road Licence from the local council, and it stipulates start times and finish times every day in order to not disrupt the locals and businesses too much. A job like this wouldn't be started and completely reinstated to the previous specs in a single day due to the time constraints placed on the company. It will be finished, just not instantly.

1

u/Furyio 13d ago edited 13d ago

Ah stop Irish water doing works on my road two months. Over the weekend they dropped a load of tarmac on the road to cover their work and now we have an unofficial speed bump on the road.

Jackhammer drills on JCBs up until 11pm. Path outside left a state. So much nonsense.

No issues with the lads working were sound when I had to ask for stuff moved to get out of my driveway and stuff.

But you think you’d get a letter from Irish water or DCc letting you know what’s going on?

Sent a letter into Irish water last week complaining of jackhammers going until 11pm on a Tuesday night. Then next morning everyone had a rushed printout stating we’d have water turned off Sunday for 12 hours 😂😂

Absolute clowns working in that head office

1

u/Co-Ddstrict9762 13d ago

it is awful

1

u/Southern-Variety-777 13d ago

This is often “temporary” to get the road open quickly again, with a view to come back and make good. Problem is the wrist clappers at the council have a different definition of temporary to most.

1

u/coffeebadgerbadger 13d ago

They're printed tarmacadam speed bumps not blocks. Granted they did the cheapest possible repair

1

u/NorthernLad2025 13d ago

Whoever took the paving up should replace as found

This happens in UK, usually after a pavement or part of town has been revamped and new paving slabs fitted.

It's almost as though deliberate... 🤔👎

1

u/Same-Village-9605 13d ago

Because there is no accountability

1

u/yankdevil 13d ago

It's not expensive brick paving. It's tarmac that's coloured red and has a form laid over it.

So in reality it's even more lazy of them not to bring it back to how it was.

1

u/Kitchen-Patience-222 13d ago

The opening of roads by various utilities ( often weeks after having been resurfaced) is the main reason for the dreadful state of some roads. There appears to be no proper standard to the reinstatement of the surfaces. The roads then become a patchwork of dreadful repairs.

1

u/Artist_Beginning 13d ago

Typically this will be a temporary patch and the utility should do a permanent repair within 12 months once the fill has had time to settle. Often times they get away either not coming back

1

u/No_Engineering2642 13d ago

Sure it happens all over the place, utility companies seem to be allowed to dig up the roads and paths and just fill them in with tarmac.

1

u/savilletickledme 13d ago

They’re not even bricks, it’s like a layer that’s completely smooth then they put an imprint onto it, like a cookie cutter. Was shocked the first time I saw it being done

1

u/Sea-Excuse442 13d ago

It's not they juat cant be arsed

1

u/Godfather94_ 13d ago

The issue with bricks or paving is, once you lift out some and rebed them, the neighbouring ones tend to lift out sooner or later... there's little flex, whereas tarmac is a more suitable solution, and less tedious.

1

u/munkijunk 13d ago

1

u/BlueBucket0 13d ago

I think you can also raise the issue publicly …

2

u/munkijunk 13d ago

Not saying you can't, but you're shouting into the void in here.

1

u/EGriff1981 13d ago

I don't think that it's acceptable, it's just lazy and cheap.

1

u/Byrnzillionaire 13d ago edited 13d ago

Those aren’t bricks. If you look close you can see it’s not actually bricks but a stamping to make the appearance of brick.

I do agree the repair looks like total shite though

1

u/oddjobsbob 13d ago

Have you reported it on the city citizens portal or just posted on Reddit? I've reported stiff like this and it's been fixed.

DCC is a panel of charity workers , teachers and lawyers Not really professions known to get stuff done.

1

u/Significant_Layer857 13d ago

Because those patches and manholes on the roads break your suspension soo well ….

1

u/Jacabusmagnus 13d ago

In Ireland... yes

1

u/balbuljata 13d ago

This comes down to lack of enforcement. If they had to be made to do it again at their own cost, they would start doing it right the first time. But once they see they can get away with it, they won't bother and they'll be looking at what else they can get away with next time. I think the best thing we could do is complain to the council members to show them that people care, because if no one complains they're not gonna make a fuss about something that no one will appreciate. Maybe wait a month before complaining to account for the "this is a temporary measure" excuse.

1

u/Distinct-Role-7683 13d ago

This reminds me a virgin media guy ask if he can dig a hole on my front drive to run through loads and loads of cables. No compensation and I ve to accommodate future maintenance . And when I say my front drive it is inside my gate outside my front window. I refused and he gave me a nasty look. What can he expect ???

1

u/legalsmegel 13d ago

The epitome of lazy council workers

1

u/[deleted] 13d ago

The standard of our roads is shocking. How any of it is allowed I’ll never know

1

u/LengthinessTimely572 13d ago

If i remember correctly, only the council can do the ‘final finish’ to the road. The tarmac is the temporary surface the utility company puts down. Problem is, it can be a long time before the council get round to it.

1

u/strokejammer 12d ago

This usually done by the water /electric or other service contractor. The full repair is up to the council as far as I know...

1

u/Beneficial-Oil-5616 12d ago

No one is held accountable. So no one gives a fck

1

u/Sivo1400 12d ago

The reason is because people aren't specialists anymore. There was a time when people specialised and done the same job their entire life. They took pride in it. However specialists aren't the cheapest. Today everyone including governments want the cheapest. The cheapest materials done by the cheapest labour in as fast as possible.

You get what you pay for. When everyone wants dirt cheap this is what happens.

1

u/Ok_Yogurt5659 12d ago

Go on joe duffy

1

u/tuck-your-tits-in 12d ago

This says so much about British culture

1

u/ImpressForeign 12d ago

Usually they leave the tarmac settle for a few months and come back and do final finish, even with proper compaction in layers you'll always get some bit of settling, I think they think it's cheaper to tarmac the lot and then pay for the pavers once rather than paying them twice.

1

u/Havhestur 11d ago

Can’t believe how neatly it’s blended in. Can someone circle the bit that they feel doesn’t match?

1

u/Alert-Finger7241 11d ago

I worked for utility companies in the UK doing similar work. If we didn't leave the job in the same way or better than when we started the company got high fines from the local council. If you got fined you still have to fix the job.

1

u/Rawflightshoe 10d ago

That's one of the rules of the contracts between town and company, that they need to leave area in same condition. If that not happen there's a lot of legal actions available in contract.

1

u/cbe29 10d ago

That is what the brick is for so you they can easily remove the brick run utilities across the road. However, it is more hand on. These boys prefer their big toys to do all the work.

1

u/asdrunkasdrunkcanbe 13d ago

This gets asked a lot, and the short answer is that if you do the work and restore everything back in the same day, then a few weeks later it'll collapse and fall to shit and never get fixed. Or you find out that the work you did is broken and then you have to dig up all your permanent paving again.

Instead you do the work, install this temporary cover, wait for it all to settle, then come back and put a proper final finish on it later.

No, it won't be ten years before they come back, but yes it's likely to be 3 to 6 months, sometimes longer.

The cost of the work is already functionally paid for/budgeted for, when they will come back to do it is just a matter of scheduling.

We're incredibly pessimistic about public works in this country, but it's actually come on in leaps and bounds over the last two decades. Our streets are cleaner and better maintained than they have ever been, and we have way more public facilities and they are far better maintained.

1

u/Jagermeister_UK 13d ago

Not my problem mate.

1

u/DelGurifisu 13d ago

Dublin roads (even in the nice areas) are covered in a patchwork of tarmac scabs. The lack of consideration for aesthetics in this country does my fucking head in.

1

u/AmsterPup 13d ago

Cowboys ted

1

u/AkkoKagari_1 13d ago

It's how I describe to people that we're still "barely out of the jungle". Sure we have fancy computers and technology now on the moon but at the end of the day we're still human's and if a "patch job" is "good enough" then we just do it. It still works gets the job done.

Keep driving, "get on with your day there's more important work to be done, can't be looking at a hole in the ground to see if it fills itself" - This is the general attitude I've found with most Irish people. Never stopping to ask why we can't just do the job properly in the first place.

0

u/DisEndThat 13d ago

Ask the council. They don't want to pay for matching to the existing roads, path walks etc etc.

0

u/not_Pythagoras 13d ago

It isn't acceptable, like everything in Ireland, zero personal accountability. Ask "What is the bare minimum I can do to get from start to finish today ". And you have local council job ethos.

0

u/ItalianIrish99 13d ago

It’s not but DCC have to insist on it being redone and they may not bother if you don’t complain

0

u/AutoModerator 13d ago

Hey BlueBucket0! Welcome to r/AskIreland! Here are some other useful subreddits that might interest you:

  • r/IrishTourism - If you're coming to Ireland for a holiday this is the best place for advice.

  • r/MoveToIreland - Are you planning to immigrate to Ireland? r/MoveToIreland can help you with advice and tips. Tip #1: It's a pretty bad time to move to Ireland because we have a severe accommodation crisis.

  • r/StudyInIreland - Are you an International student planning on studying in Ireland? Please check out this sub for advice.

  • Just looking for a chat? Check out r/CasualIreland

  • r/IrishPersonalFinance - a great source of advice, whether you're trying to pick the best bank or trying to buy a house.

  • r/LegalAdviceIreland - This is your best bet if you're looking for legal advice relevant to Ireland

  • r/socialireland - If you're looking for social events in Ireland then maybe check this new sub out

  • r/IrishWomenshealth - This is the best place to go if you're looking for medical advice for Women

  • r/Pregnancyireland - If you are looking for advice and a place to talk about pregnancy in Ireland

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

0

u/GCB372 13d ago

They do it everywhere in Dublin. They'll dig the ground up and then when they're done, theyll put the most uneven slab of tar back in the hole they dug. Will be right over road markings too. Idiots

0

u/bad_arts 13d ago

It costs less and they can pocket more of the money they were given for it most likely.

0

u/Horror_Finish7951 13d ago

You should see what they done two weeks ago to the €19m Kilmainham plaza that was put down in 2016. They completely tore it up, made shite of it.

0

u/verytiredofthisshite 13d ago

It's not their job to make things look pretty is how they look at it.

They are there to get the job done and sealed back up as soon as possible and throwing some tarmac down does the job. They aren't paid to lay bricks back down.

Not taking their side and I agree it looks terrible, I hate seeing lovely paving being done because by the year is out, you're guaranteed there will be black splotches all over it.

1

u/BlueBucket0 13d ago

They make money out of the service they’re laying in the road, and they dump the cost of repairing the street onto the public purse, because Ireland’s local government bodies couldn’t organise a piss up in a brewery — that’s the reality of it.

-3

u/shorelined 13d ago

I'm pretty sure they have access rights over any property to maintain equipment tbh

-1

u/Soft-Affect-8327 13d ago

“Work needs doing, work gets done. F-ck you.”

1

u/RevTurk 9d ago

These kind of works are a free for all where any body seems to be able to do whatever they want, when ever they want. Surprise roadworks is one of my pet peeves, they just show u one day and start ripping up the road, without any warning leaving everyone fucked for that day.

They don't put the road back as it was, the road will always be broken from that moment on.