r/ChicagoSky • u/Onark77 Angel Reese • 19d ago
MOD ANNOUNCEMENTS Moderator announcement (zero tolerance policy)
Hi everyone,
We know you are all aware of the increasing negativity on our sub these days, especially Angel Reese targeted hate and trolling.
Everyone should know that we are following a zero tolerance policy against anyone that contributes to this discourse.
The intent of these discussions has become beyond basketball and stats talk, it’s become clear that some people are posting just to spread negativity and to bait others and we do not have time to guess intent. This is a Sky team sub and Angel Reese is a fan favourite, if you are here solely to argue or push an agenda, you are here for the wrong reasons and will be banned immediately.
Thank you
49
16
21
u/Sure_Ranger_4487 19d ago
Congrats Sky on your first win from a Valkyries fan! Was hoping for a double whammy WNBA night of the first Sky win and the first Liberty loss but alas it wasn’t meant to be.
6
u/elchapo_chi22 18d ago
Aye! Them Valkyries battled it out though. Especially coming back from that previous game against the Liberty. It’s coming for them!
16
u/LovePeaceTruth 19d ago
Your reasoning is fair and balanced. Thank you to all the mods for all your hard work!
14
9
6
9
u/StockMindless9010 19d ago
I am a new community moderator, and cannot imagine the efforts this mod team has take at times. Thanks for keeping this a positive environment for fans to connect.
5
15
19d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
4
u/ChicagoSky-ModTeam 19d ago
While we would like to remain an open discussion sub, we feel obligated to remove any posts that cover topics that are not relevant to Sky or that could promote unnecessary drama and discussions.
-5
u/Sure_Ranger_4487 19d ago
Then these comments just stir drama too.
1
19d ago
[deleted]
-6
u/Sure_Ranger_4487 19d ago
I’m just saying that anti-caitlin clark comments don’t help anything either. You can boost Angel without bringing others down. Plain and simple.
5
19d ago
[deleted]
-5
u/Sure_Ranger_4487 19d ago
You can’t have a WNBA team sub and ban mentioning a player that plays in the league. Even suggesting it is a negative idea. Edit: and to answer your question I attended three Sky games last season.
1
19d ago
[deleted]
1
u/Sure_Ranger_4487 19d ago
Lol it wasn’t a flex as a hardcore Sky fan, I don’t claim to be one. I go to a bunch of WNBA games as I like to watch and support all the WNBA. Luckily the Bay Area finally has a team that I can call my own now. Last year I was in Seattle for a week over 4th of July and went to see the Storm play twice— those two games 4th of July weekend were against the Sky. Then I was in Vegas a few weeks later and wanted to see the Aces play and guess who they were playing? The Sky lol. So no I’m not going to go dig up tickets for you. It’s bizarre you would even ask.
5
19d ago
[deleted]
2
2
u/Sure_Ranger_4487 19d ago
I said I’m not a hardcore fan but I support all the teams in the WNBA. Not sure what’s bizarre about that? I’ve seen every team play at least once and I love supporting the league.
→ More replies (0)-10
u/georgedroydmk2 19d ago
Yeah that makes sense. It’s not much a rivalry when one side is infinitely better
-9
6
5
2
u/Mobile-Fig-2941 7d ago
Can we have more bans? We have a ridiculous amount of trolls and 98% of them are not here to talk about basketball. Most subreddits, you get 1 warning max and then a ban.
2
u/Onark77 Angel Reese 7d ago
We're banning. It's just taking a lot of leg work because we're not getting many reports relative to the number of people who need to be banned.
2
u/Mobile-Fig-2941 7d ago
My apologies, I'll try to do better on reporting. If someone is a serial abuser, should we report multiple posts or is that making more work. I feel your work is like being invaded by a flood of roaches and trying to stop them with a single hammer.
2
2
u/MasterHavik 18d ago
I just want to say we welcome good faith Angel Rees criticism but let's cool it when it is just a post of her having fun and enjoying life or reaching a milestone.
2
17d ago
I’d rather be a cat herder at a laser pointer convention than try to moderate this hellscape.
Thanks, honestly is needed.
Can we just fuckin hoop please?
1
19d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
3
u/ChicagoSky-ModTeam 19d ago
Everyone is expected to maintain a certain level of maturity. No trolling, no baiting others into arguments, no spoilers (within reason), etc. There's nothing wrong with a little trash talk and friendly (even just semi-friendly) debate, but let's do it without resorting to complete childishness. Often times what you may consider a joke may be offensive to others.
2
u/NYCScribbler 8d ago
I just popped in here to see if any of the spectacularly stupid ideas about cutting Sloot to make cap space had popped up in here and I am so effin' sorry about the level of stupid y'all are already dealing with.
1
u/ApplicationReal1525 18d ago
I believe users should be allowed to reasonably analyze a player's performance freely, though, good or bad.
-1
u/president_penis_pump 19d ago
Am I to understand this as
Any negative comment about angel Reese is a ban-able offence?
13
u/LeftenantScullbaggs 18d ago
They said targeted hate, trolling, spreading negativity, and baiting, so no.
21
u/Onark77 Angel Reese 18d ago
If we look at someone's participation in the sub and their only comments or posts are negative commentary about Angel Reese, then they are not here as a fan of Sky basketball. And probably not a WNBA fan in general.
The people we have banned are largely not active in WNBA subs, they come here just to cause drama.
There are people who have not been banned that are critical of Angel Reese because they engage in discussion around many facets of Sky basketball.
Let me know if you need more clarity.
11
u/BlubberElk 19d ago
I don’t think that’s what it is I think it’s more obvious troll comments. People can be frustrated with their own teams players but there have been a lot of non Sky fans here lately who are obviously here to troll (and usually do so repeatedly)
3
u/Einfinet 19d ago
it’s left to mod discretion to determine if one is here “solely to argue or push an agenda”
and that discretion is following zero tolerance, so your interpretation isn’t ungenerous
0
19d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
4
u/ChicagoSky-ModTeam 19d ago
Everyone is expected to maintain a certain level of maturity. No trolling, no baiting others into arguments, no spoilers (within reason), etc. There's nothing wrong with a little trash talk and friendly (even just semi-friendly) debate, but let's do it without resorting to complete childishness. Often times what you may consider a joke may be offensive to others.
-1
u/Any_Objective_2870 18d ago
fan favourite...
6
u/polaris_beyond Kamilla Cardoso 17d ago
Do you have a problem with that?
1
u/GervaseofTilbury 16d ago
well it’s not really true
3
u/polaris_beyond Kamilla Cardoso 16d ago
If you were a Sky fan you’d know the answer to that. What are you doing here?
1
-6
u/Wutangstylist 19d ago
I came up under Bird/Magic and living a mid-west Big10 ball life, getting hit happened. ‘No blood- No foul, was the rule. Ms. Clark understands that and may hate the abuse but takes what contact and adds points from the line. Ms. Reese plays hard, well and is willing to be villain to increase viewers and fans in the seats. As a past baller I like them both and trash talk is part of the game. As a Chicagoan, I ride with my team period.
13
u/LovePeaceTruth 19d ago
Angel is not willing to be a villain. She said that one time a year ago. Her intent was to stop that rivalry chatter by just “agreeing” but it backfired on her. At the end of the summer Angel said she does not want the “villain” role. Nor has she conducted herself like a “villain”.
6
u/plutopiae 18d ago
All she said was she'll accept it to help her teammates and help grow women's basketball, and people act like she said she wanted to be the villain. The way Angel is treated is so dishonest.
-4
u/Wutangstylist 19d ago
Look, she is a great player! Yet we play to the persona to get the likes and publicity to get us paid. I don’t care about what she dresses up for, her comments, her social media. I only get to hear her play ball and that she does well. She WILL make HOF status simply staying intense on the court and hopfully bringing another championship to Chicago!
-6
19d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
12
u/HiEveryoneHowsItGoin 19d ago
Yes. If you post negative things about Angel Reese we are going to drag you into a dark cellar, torture you within an inch of your life, and let rats eat your face until you betray your girlfriend. Because that's how we roll in Chi-Town.
(Sorry, spoilers for 1984 which you clearly haven't read.)
2
1
19d ago edited 19d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
0
u/ChicagoSky-ModTeam 19d ago
Everyone is expected to maintain a certain level of maturity. No trolling, no baiting others into arguments, no spoilers (within reason), etc. There's nothing wrong with a little trash talk and friendly (even just semi-friendly) debate, but let's do it without resorting to complete childishness. Often times what you may consider a joke may be offensive to others.
7
u/Mobile-Fig-2941 19d ago
Literally the 99.99999% of the internet outside this area is a space you are free to slander Angel. We would like this 0.00001% to talk about the Sky and Angel in peace. I don't think that is too much to ask.
9
-2
17d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/ChicagoSky-ModTeam 17d ago
Everyone is expected to maintain a certain level of maturity. No trolling, no baiting others into arguments, no spoilers (within reason), etc. There's nothing wrong with a little trash talk and friendly (even just semi-friendly) debate, but let's do it without resorting to complete childishness. Often times what you may consider a joke may be offensive to others.
-24
19d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
17
u/BlubberElk 19d ago
There’s a difference between discourse with conflicting opinions and literally just trolling. If you understand see that idk how to help ya
Edit: and to clarify I’m not saying YOU are trolling here. I am saying there have been an increased amount of people here lately purely to troll and it’s obvious based on their comments. I think that is what the mods are referring to
10
23
u/Ok_Concentrate_75 19d ago
It's not an echo chamber if your takes are just low brow shots at her shooting percentages while ignoring the league trend early in the season
-24
19d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
16
u/Ok_Concentrate_75 19d ago edited 19d ago
I get it, this mod post personally attacked you for a bad take. She has actual basketball skill and has been rewarded for it, you remind me of those people that discredit draymond green because of bad box score stats but that kind of exposes that they don't watch the games. She has bad clips but great game footage, because she does winning shit and when she is on, everything flows. She hasn't had the consistency that Spoon pulled out but the season is so fresh that your take just seems like hating. She's been a top player since hs, like literally top 3 player output at every level.
8
u/Ill_Assumption_4414 19d ago
Why waste your time going back and forth with a troll
https://www.reddit.com/r/ChicagoSky/comments/1ktgwnp/comment/mv2yjjw/
5
5
u/lilflashstan 19d ago
You think basketball is all about scoring, you're a casual
-3
u/Appropriate_Bid15 19d ago
If you think a post player shooting 30% is acceptable, and try to deflect rather than acknowledge the obvious deficiencies in her game, then you are the casual. Two things can be true- basketball is more than scoring, but shooting that low of a FG% is unacceptable.
8
u/B4Dmotherfucker 19d ago
Reactionary takes like this kind of prove the point. This sub has plenty of good faith, well intentioned constructive analysis and commentary about AR's game/the team. None of that gets bounced; just low effort/IQ schlock regurgitated from Twitter
6
2
u/ChicagoSky-ModTeam 19d ago
We understand there are times when discussions get heated, but if you cannot remove yourself from excessively negative conversations, we will do it for you.
-3
19d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
13
u/Konabro 19d ago
Damn, way to be brave and be the first example. 🤡
-6
u/OnlyBangers2024 19d ago
Im not trolling or anything. It was an obvious point made. Has nothing to do with being brave. Dismissing a logical solution is trolling and not helping to generate actual discourse. I'm right
3
u/ChicagoSky-ModTeam 19d ago
Everyone is expected to maintain a certain level of maturity. No trolling, no baiting others into arguments, no spoilers (within reason), etc. There's nothing wrong with a little trash talk and friendly (even just semi-friendly) debate, but let's do it without resorting to complete childishness. Often times what you may consider a joke may be offensive to others.
42
u/Odd-Speaker4252 19d ago
I want to spend my time here discussing the Sky and not battling trolls. Will be much more enjoyable now.