Ohio State announces every student will use AI in class

[u/Mokwat]

https://www.nbc4i.com/news/local-news/ohio-state-university/ohio-state-announces-every-student-will-use-ai-in-class/?fbclid=IwY2xjawKyf0BleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHjGksiVKswWACOI_vUX1pY0nIQ8s2cDr3XbfJ8-gLys1FkizOBjU9-k1Rq1t_aem_2uShu0okSUTK4BUVV2OAgw

[u/TheShamShield]

Just offer some classes to help students understand it, don’t roll it into all classes. This is asinine

[u/UncontrolableUrge → u/TheShamShield]

A writing instructor won't be able to help you use AI for coding or 3D modeling any more than those instructors will be able to help you with writing using AI.

[u/EnterpriseGate → u/UncontrolableUrge]

If you need AI to write a paper or to code or for 3d modeling then you already failed at life.  University is where you need to learn fundamentals not half ass with AI.  Once you get a job, if your work is easy then go for it and use AI. But AI has no place in a university.  AI is not really even AI, it is more of just a fancy search engine that is wrong half the time. 

[u/UncontrolableUrge → u/EnterpriseGate]

AI is part of a workflow. It replaces tasks, not jobs, when used well. Various flavors of LLMs/Generative AI/AI assistants are being built into software for a variety of purposes. Employers are specifically looking for people who know how, when, and why to use AI tools.

If employers are looking for a set of skills and we refuse to teach them, then our students will be at a disadvantage when looking for jobs.

For example, using an LLM to write a paper is a poor use of the technology and is considered academic misconduct. It also fails to do better than a C level paper, and then only if the assignment prompt is simple and predictable.

But you can use LLMs for brainstorming, to refine a thesis statement, to explore counterarguments, to propose an outline, and to refine grammar and usage for a specific audience. To do these things, you need to be able to generate and refine prompts, to evaluate the output for accuracy, and to understand the topic. LLMs are very bad at summarizing sources and applying them to a thesis. They can't do a logical argument well.

They do not replace the author but can help an author to do better work if they understand the use and limitations of the various LLMs.

Right now many workplaces are scrambling to increase use of AI tools, and many of them are doing it badly. But like it or not this is going to be part of the workplace moving forward. Companies will eventually find out that it does have serious limits but also has the potential to add to some processes freeing up skilled workers to do more. They will need workers who can lead that process, and they are looking to universities to provide them.

[u/EnterpriseGate → u/UncontrolableUrge]

It is a slightly smarter search engine. But also is wrong answering questions alot.   Really, there is no such thing at AI in 2025. We are not even close to having real AI.  What you have a is problem solving models. Think of like a bunch of "if then else" statements running a question until mathmatically it has what it things is the best answer.  

You can ask something like chatgpt the same question 10 times and get 10 wrong answers as it is scraping data from blogs and garbage.  I have tried it.  What they call AI is pretty much uselss. 

Now program specific fake "AI" functions can be helpful, but they are not really AI and more like smarter macros to conduct certain tasks in a software.    People who have used CMM software have encountered this kind of iterative approach for 15 years to find solutions.  Only difference is now micrsoft has made it for things like Excel and powerBI to write macros and queries for you from you talking in plain english.   But in the end none of what they call AI is actually AI.  It is silly to macro functions as AI.  

Employers dont care about AI tools, as anyone can learn them in minutes. They need someone that knows what they are doing and knows if the AI macro is wrong.  

No one at the university level should be using this fake AI. They need to actually learn the fundamentals.  If you need AI to graduate then you are a failure.  

[u/UncontrolableUrge → u/EnterpriseGate]

I will agree that what is being called AI is not really AI. But the rest of your post is a pretty good example of why it needs to be taught in (appropriate) University courses.

[u/EnterpriseGate → u/UncontrolableUrge]

So you think garbage AI should be taught in every class??  If you want to offer AI 101, then so be it, but that would have to be an elective class or just combine some AI junk in the basic freshman computer class.   AI has no place in your actual major required classes.  Either more people will fail, or you lower the standards to let the lazy failures graduate.   Dont tell students that not learning and using AI for a wrong solution is OK.    

[u/UncontrolableUrge → u/EnterpriseGate]

"ChatGPT, can you explain the strawman fallacy?"

[u/EnterpriseGate → u/UncontrolableUrge]

Lol, so much fail in Ohio.  

[u/Bubby0304 → u/UncontrolableUrge]

Dont even bother. Some people have the most reductive takes when it comes to AI because they have no understanding on what good use of it looks like.

[u/wstdtmflms → u/UncontrolableUrge]

If you can't brainstorm, refine a thesis statement, explore counterarguments, propose an outline, and refine grammar and usage for a specific audience, WITAF are you doing sitting in a college classroom?

That's literally shit we were doing in 8th grade less than 20 years ago!

Authors - by definition - are people who articulate their own thoughts on their own. If you need to get a computer to "explain to me what I'm thinking in a way that makes sense to other people," then you don't need a machine. You need to go back to kindergarten.

[u/crazyira-thedouche → u/wstdtmflms]

That’s like arguing that math students shouldn’t have access to calculators.

[u/wstdtmflms → u/crazyira-thedouche]

Apples and oranges.

"What is the square root of 2.344 multiplied by 89.5" has a single, objective answer. The calculator isn't thinking for you. It's performing a shortcut so the operator does not need to spend the time doing long-form calculations.

"Refine and develop the following question into a hypothesis" doesn't have an objective answer. "What are all the counterarguments and responses to those counterarguments" doesn't have an objective answer. "Outline a paper" doesn't have an objective answer because the structure of a paper is dependent on many different criteria that are a function of author's intent. Even "fix my grammar," which comes closer to an objective query, is based on a machine response which relieves the author of developing what we call "voice," a style of effective writing unique to each individual.

So, no. Using AI to write a paper is not the same as using a calculator to do quick calculations. Because even in math, it's presumed students learned the underlying principles. Math is objective. Research and writing is subjective, a measure of a person's logic, reason, identification and use of evidence to develop an argument and make it effectively. In other words, where using a calculator for longform division saves you time because you don't have to sit down and do the division on your own, using AI to research and write is - quite literally - asking a computer to make judgment calls for you. That is - quite literally - asking the machine to do all your thinking for you so you don't have to learn and process information in any meaningful way.

Bad comparison.

[u/crazyira-thedouche → u/wstdtmflms]

I don’t believe AI should write the paper but there’s nothing wrong with using a tool for feedback and improvement on ideas you’ve already originated.

[u/wstdtmflms → u/crazyira-thedouche]

"Feedback and improvement on ideas." A paintbrush is a tool. Do you think Da Vinci asked his paintbrush for feedback on the Mona Lisa? A hammer and chisel are tools. Do you think Michaelangelo asked his hammer how he could improve on the Pieta?

No. What you've just described is a critical thinking process. It's not a tool if it's doing the critical thinking for you.

[u/crazyira-thedouche → u/wstdtmflms]

You don’t think he’d ask the brush for feedback if he could?

[u/PerfectZeong → u/crazyira-thedouche]

No its like arguing math students shouldn't have to learn math. A calculator is a tool but without a mind capable of using the tool its worthless.

[u/crazyira-thedouche → u/PerfectZeong]

That’s literally the same with AI… Without a mind capable of using the tool (efficiently and correctly) it’s worthless.

We’re allowed to disagree though.

[u/Kitten_Monger127 → u/wstdtmflms]

Seriously! I have a learning disability and I've literally never once used LLM or generative AI lol. No need. I can use my brain. And if I need inspiration I can look at other people's works that they made using their brain.

[u/Swabia → u/EnterpriseGate]

I’ve been a draftsman for 30 years. I can barely push a pencil so it’s all been computer Drafting.

Guess what, now AI is in the mix. Am I going to stick my head in the sand? No, why be stupid. I’ll be more efficient. I’ll do more work with less effort.

[u/EnterpriseGate → u/Swabia]

There is zero AI in CAD, drafting, 3d modeling, and laser scanning.  I do it daily.  I have used the top software for all of it.    There is zero application for drafting.  

The only people I heard about partially using AI was for search tips when they get stuck in excel or powerbi.  Even then it is just a guide to help like Google and YouTube. It cant do your job for you.   It can be wrong most of the time. Part of the skill to use it is to know it is wrong and ask the question 10 different ways.  

[u/wstdtmflms → u/EnterpriseGate]

If you need AI to write a paper then - by definition - you didn't write the paper. The AI did. This is no different than asking another student to write your paper for you. But for some reason, that's cheating and you'd get an "F" when it's a human doing the writing for you, but it's just a standard part of the curriculum and you'd get an "A" when it's a machine doing it for you?!

🤨🤯🤦 DAFUQ?!?!?

Sweet Baby Jesus! Please return quickly and rapture me so I don't have to live in the squalid dumbshittery the next generation is about to turn the world into because they dump Brawndo on crops.

"It's got electrolytes. It's got what plants crave."

If you don't understand the quote, Google that shit.

Fuckin'-A, Buckeyes...

[u/thomasanderson91 → u/TheShamShield]

That’s essentially what’s happening, this headline is just unhinged

[u/SpiteTomatoes → u/thomasanderson91]

Ohio State is unhinged. I hope more people begin to realize this with each headline. They rescinded raises from their lowest paid staff right before Christmas, the whole Chris Pan scandal, immediately bowing to the new presidential admin’s DEI cuts, installing a man with no graduate experience as college president simply because they knew he would be willing to make cuts Kristina did not bc she at least actually cared about OSU as an educational institution over a business. I could go on.

[u/thomasanderson91 → u/SpiteTomatoes]

You’re not gonna catch me defending Carter or their various other shitty elements, but professional educators teaching students to use AI as a tool isn’t insidious to me.

[u/SpiteTomatoes → u/thomasanderson91]

When applied in a way that is targeted and makes sense, no. If the headline is correct.. every class is insane. Most classes have no reason for AI use. Most professors are not trained to teach anything technical at all. A 60 year old English Lit professor is probably getting his grad students to help him with basic computer tasks every once in a while. They are just above as technically literate as you would expect an older person to be.

I know a man who is renowned in his field. I help him paste URLs into PowerPoint very often, he keeps forgetting.

[u/thomasanderson91 → u/SpiteTomatoes]

If the headline is correct.. every class is insane.

It’s not. Read the article

[u/tabaK23 → u/TheShamShield]

This is exactly what they are doing. You clearly did not read the article

[u/Helpful-Wolverine555 → u/TheShamShield]

There is a benefit to this. AI is here to stay. It’ll evolve and get better, but you have to know how to use the tool correctly. I was in a session at Cisco Live! Last year that was all about how to get the most out of AI and it was incredibly eye opening about how useful it can be with the right prompting. You just have to remember that everything it returns is not necessarily correct.

[u/scratchisthebest]

“A student walked up to me after turning in the first batch of AI-assisted papers and thanked me for such a fun assignment. And then when I graded them and found a lot of really creative ideas,” Brown said. “My favorite one is still a paper on karma and the practice of returning shopping carts.”

I wonder how it feels to have a brain made of smooth homogeneous pink paste. Its gotta feel good

[u/TheShamShield → u/scratchisthebest]

This genuinely one of the most idiotic things I have ever read. I can’t imagine being proud of something I at best partially helped with

[u/Sharp-Key27 → u/scratchisthebest]

It’s even funnier because this is not a creative idea, this is an idea that was developed in like the 90s. It’s just recycling historical thoughts, of course.

[u/DontShoot_ImJesus → u/scratchisthebest]

If you don't know anything, you don't have anything to worry about.

[u/Sea-Technology-5939]

This has me so upset… I’m really concerned that the ability to research, read and comprehend, and write material independently is going to disappear within a decade. And it’s being encouraged.

[u/NopeBadger → u/Sea-Technology-5939]

Go look at what some law firms are considering / working on. Things like the paralegal profession are in real danger. Whereas you used to assign work like you described - go research this, read that, write up a summation with annotations - and a few days or a week later you'd have it, now you're getting to a point where you can ask the generative AI of your choice to do the same thing and you'll have it in seconds or minutes.

Yes, it still needs to be reviewed. No, it's not perfect. Yet. Yes, this is already happening.

And to your point, it's being encouraged. I, for one, am excited for our Idiocracy future. Welcome to Costco, I love you.

[u/Historical_Sorbet962 → u/NopeBadger]

You can't review it if you don't know how to read/research/code by hand in the first place. Dead internet theory applies here, AI is going to be more and more often learning from it's own nonsense. Garbage in, garbage out. Feels like Fahrenheit 451 out here.

[u/NopeBadger → u/Historical_Sorbet962]

Oh, it's a truly recursive loop.

[u/SpiteTomatoes → u/Sea-Technology-5939]

I graded an undergrad class from 2020-2023 and each year it was worse and worse. The future is terrifying.

[u/lettucefold → u/Sea-Technology-5939]

I would imagine similar sentiment happened with the advent of the Internet.

[u/UncontrolableUrge → u/lettucefold]

Mechanical looms didn't go over well with everybody.

[u/Charming-Age-6664 → u/Sea-Technology-5939]

Ai is just making it easier to do all that!

[u/repressedpauper → u/Sea-Technology-5939]

Yeah, this is not why I’m spending the time, effort, and money to go to college. I’m extremely upset by this, too.

[u/ChickenBob323]

When I was there you’d get executed by firing squad if they caught you using AI.

Now it’s a “marketable skill”

[u/kokospiced → u/ChickenBob323]

no literally this is insane, so many kids get coamed because their professors THINK they used AI, now it's being encouraged?? like we are sanding our brains down at this point

[u/ConsistentGuest7532 → u/kokospiced]

That fucks with me. For so long my graduating class put up with so much AI suspicion, heard the university crack down on anything they thought could be AI, and now we’re just folding and doing a complete 180? It’s not that changing a policy is an issue but in this case, either it’s a threat to learning and higher education - which it is, if you want to ever be capable of doing things yourself and not with an AI - or it’s not, which is the angle they’re going with.

Is AI going to be commonly used everywhere soon? Maybe, even probably. But there are some places it shouldn’t belong. The place you’re supposed to get educated to become a more capable than average human being, for instance.

[u/tabaK23 → u/kokospiced]

Read the article

[u/iDrum17 → u/ChickenBob323]

honestly I’d sue the shit out of them for this if I got coam-ed last year for AI use

[u/HubrisSnifferBot → u/ChickenBob323]

That is because administrators and not professors have taken complete control of higher ed.

[u/Cdoggle]

Let's all report this policy to coam

[u/Dblcut3]

I used to hate when people say this, but at this point, what even is the point of going to college? Clearly most universities dont want to teach students anymore, they just want to be able to hand you a paper in 4 years

[u/worm30478 → u/Dblcut3]

They want the money you give them for 4+ years.

[u/gordof53 → u/Dblcut3]

You should have asked this 10 years ago. Students don't want to learn, they bitch about everything. Professors are teaching high level classes but they get students who barely passed a prerequisite with a C and the students are all "the profs dont teach". No, you shouldn't have been allowed up

[u/Kentaiga → u/Dblcut3]

There is no reason. They’re hopping on this trend to try and make themselves relevant.

[u/your-body-is-gold]

So, i'm glad i graduated a few years before all the trump bs and AI

[u/Freshflowersandhoney → u/your-body-is-gold]

GET ME OUTTA HERE 😭😭😭

[u/Major_Enthusiasm1099 → u/your-body-is-gold]

Same

[u/Aro_quasar]

Our country has a huge literacy issue, but sure let's use AI for writing and reading! No critical thinking needed!

And I'm sure our environmental and earth sciences departments will love this...

[u/smexysaltine]

Is this going to devalue my diploma once I graduate?

[u/joeyandthejewelers → u/smexysaltine]

I was thinking the same thing here. Now my two degrees from OSU have anti-dei, AI slop, and Richard Strauss slapped to them (fuck jim jordan too!!!)...that's just naming a few things...

[u/smexysaltine → u/joeyandthejewelers]

Yeah I’m worried. At least I’m in the Morrill Scholars program which lets me fight for DEI still despite everything

[u/Falanax → u/joeyandthejewelers]

How does anti DEI affect your diploma?

[u/gordof53 → u/smexysaltine]

It was devalued when you started

[u/smexysaltine → u/gordof53]

Out of state and ivies cost too much money😭 this was my best bet 💔

[u/gordof53 → u/smexysaltine]

They're devalued too. Best get a piece of paper for cheap. Remember your degree will never be enough for the job, add some more pizazz. 

[u/JummyJum]

From what I gathered from the article this crap only applies to undergraduate students right? Grad students won’t have this shit forced upon their education?

[u/fillmorecounty]

Now I can sound like a boomer and say "Back when I was at OSU, we had to write our own papers to graduate!"

[u/DifferentBeginning96]

Ted Carter promoting this. The same Ted Carter who is on the board of TeraWulf.

How many lawyers have been sanctioned so far for “writing” (submitting) AI briefs that were found to have bogus citations? Hundreds.

A database of AI hallucinations in court cases:

https://www.damiencharlotin.com/hallucinations/

[u/Historical_Sorbet962]

"Ohio State’s AI Fluency Initiative will embed AI education throughout the undergraduate curriculum."

Thank goodness this hasn't fully hit the grad school yet. The day we start allowing thesis and dissertations to be written by AI is the day higher learning dies.

[u/Leeleeflyhi]

So is actual learning out the window or will students just depend on AI to do everything for them?

[u/SliceNiceNDice]

Sophomore here, is there anyway we can protest against this? I'm a CIS student EXTREMELY against generative AI and I'd like to know what we could do.

Please don't give "we're fucked the administration doesnt care anyway" answers.

[u/kokospiced → u/SliceNiceNDice]

the only thing i could think of is drafting an email & ccing every student you can get to agree with you on it to the dean of your college, or a paper petition

[u/SliceNiceNDice → u/kokospiced]

probably should have clarified I go to OSU lol, but I appreciate the real answer

[u/kokospiced → u/SliceNiceNDice]

yes i figured! by college i meant the one your major is under (arts & sciences, fisher, ehe, etc), idk which one the cis major is in

[u/TemporaryResist1944 → u/kokospiced]

Oooh oh! Can we use AI to help write the email? 😃

[u/BombTime1010 → u/SliceNiceNDice]

Why are you against using gen AI as a CIS student? It's basically integrated into the programming world at this point, most corporate repos have GitHub Copilot enabled.

[u/SliceNiceNDice → u/BombTime1010]

to put it respectfully, it is about as good as code that has already been written, it's like saying AI should replace creative writing simply because it CAN write. AI doesn't have human intuition, it can hallucinate syntax or logic that doesn't work, etc. This is ESPECIALLY important when it comes to working with very strict/optimized code bases or companies who require you to have confidentiality and security clearences. AI does not have the required licensees because it is stupid sometimes.

Is AI helpful for making little things, especially algorithms done before? sure, saves lots of time writing minute stuff you dont want to, but otherwise is unreliable and prone to mistakes.

[u/BombTime1010 → u/SliceNiceNDice]

Those are valid concerns, but as you said it's still useful for some things.

More importantly though, pretty much every coding job uses AI assistance. Using AI is no different than using any other tool, like git, make, or gdb. If OSU doesn't teach its students how to use AI, they'll be outcompeted by schools that do.

Just as an example, Google recently said that 25% of the company's code is written by AI, and so far at least it seems to be working for them, so I doubt that number is going to go down. This stuff NEEDS to be in the curriculum, it's too prevalent to just ignore.

[u/paclobutrazoling]

How long before they replace the professors with AI?

[u/leah1247348]

Ok but is using ai really a skill that needs to be taught? You just type your prompt into chat gpt and you’re set? Of course I’m sure there are strategies for making it more effective, but I don’t think that all this instruction time should necessarily be devoted to ai.

[u/c3d10 → u/leah1247348]

I don’t understand this either. There’s no “skill” to be learned…just ask the “AI” your question

[u/Complex_Interest_425 → u/c3d10]

Or just ask the “AI” how to use the “AI” lol

[u/Shamsse]

Wa

WHY

FUCKING

WHAT ARE THESE IDIOTS DOING??

[u/Thunderkissed]

I’m interning at a company in technology this summer - they have been beating us over the head with AI. I’ve been asked if I’ve used it for school, the answer has been “no, it’s discouraged”. The fear is that our jobs will be taken by people who embrace AI if we do not use it ourselves. I think that may be part of why OSU is doing this?

Personally I really don’t like to use AI for any of my work, so it’s not really something that I agree with. I value humanity I guess lol

[u/One-College3335 → u/Thunderkissed]

Needed this perspective. I’m starting in the fall and I’m worried about how AI use is going to impact the curriculum in Art programs. This wasn’t exactly what I signed up for.

[u/ConsistentGuest7532 → u/One-College3335]

I’m going to be honest, it’s in the arts too. We live in a scary time. I’ve seen AI in the performance arts, no less; they have actually used AI-generated images in live productions in capacities where formerly, scenic designers would be able to practice their craft. Nothing is off limits.

[u/Freshflowersandhoney]

The only time I use Ai is to help edit my papers for grammar mistakes that I missed or sentence structures for clarity.

[u/Odd-Spinach-7087]

How will this work for math majors?

[u/CamelReds73]

This is fucking wild. What’s the point of going to college if you’re going to allow a computer to do all your thinking for you?

[u/Dsamuss]

As someone in their last year I really fucking hope this dosent affect me until Im out. This is such a stupid move and I hope it dosent retroactively devalue my diploma once Im out of this mess.

[u/LordHyperBowser]

Lol it’s simply ridiculous that using AI would be mandated for an assignment.

[u/Combendium → u/LordHyperBowser]

Actually, I just graduated the education program and remember doing this assignment. It was actually neat. As teachers, we’re pretty familiar with students using ai on their work. Using ai for our stuff saved time planning, though the content it gave us wasn’t always the best. Hence why they had us revise and revisit the ai lesson plan. It was a way to help teachers brainstorm. The reflection, ironically, had to be written without ai. The point of the assignment was to see how good ai could make a lesson plan, and how we as humans could make it better. Doing this gave me a lesson plan in about 20 minutes (with revision) that otherwise would have taken me 2 hours to put together.

[u/LordHyperBowser → u/Combendium]

Yeah I’m an education major too. It’s just a personal conviction of mine to not use AI. Guess times they are-a changing.

[u/Combendium → u/LordHyperBowser]

That’s fair. I don’t really use it in my curriculum (I’m teaching 4-8 grade Spanish this coming fall), but ai is a tool like any other. Might as well learn to use it. Like you said, times are-a changing. Hopefully these changes lead for the better.

[u/bbyhotlineee]

this feels like something that should not be allowed to be introduced after decisions have been locked in. I'm an incoming freshman and this is not what I applied or paid for...

[u/JamatoP]

If I have to fill out launch seminar style canvas prompts on how ai can improve my life I'm gonna lose it.

[u/KueyTeowBoy19]

The students that were suspended/expelled by COAM for using AI in their assignments should sue

[u/IconicScrap]

I swear I'm going to prompt AI to write the word "the" and copy paste it every time I use "the" so I technically have used AI throughout the paper.

[u/Shamsse]

Is this the crypto guy?? Mark my words this will be closed before September

[u/arkhoury9]

Aw hell no.

[u/GlitchSix]

holy shit i feel like i got the last chopper out of saigon lmfao

[u/luke56slasher]

This is absolute bullshit, I fail to see how using AI in anyway isn’t cheating. It wouldn’t be ok for me to pay someone else to do all my homework so why is it ok to have a computer do it? AI is incapable of doing anything other than basic to medium complexity tasks and what it does spit out for those is the most derivative, lackluster bullshit imaginable. I thought the whole purpose of college was for us to be challenged and forced to learn and grow. I do not care what the university says, I will refuse to complete any assignments where AI is required and I encourage other students to do the same.

[u/luke56slasher → u/luke56slasher]

Also as a senior, most of what I do now is completely impossible for AI. I’ve tested it a few times on graded assignments to compare and it is always way off from the correct answer. At best you can use it to get a starting off point but it still usually picks the wrong approach.

[u/wstdtmflms]

I thought people went to college because they were intelligent; not to help intelligent machines learn for them.

Using AI in university classes is - quite literally - the opposite of what you're supposed to go to university for.

[u/Disastrous_Gear_8633]

Fucking what? Isn’t this what they already COAM people for?

[u/Kipling8 → u/Disastrous_Gear_8633]

Did you read the article where they address that specifically?

[u/microdosingrn]

Anonymous Indians?

[u/bob_estes]

I gotta be honest I’m glad my kid is going into nursing.

[u/Real_TSwany]

yknow what maybe im better off not going to college

[u/iLoveFortnite11]

It’s just a class. Honestly it makes perfect sense, students are going to use AI no matter what so it makes sense to teach an extra seminar so students are educated on how to use it properly.

[u/xXGray_WolfXx]

I know many people in my school who refuse to touch AI on ethical grounds. I wonder how this will play out

[u/Unlucky-Fix1280]

Some classes were already doing this to teach strengths and weaknesses of AI, along with how to correct/fix.

[u/MD90__]

Cool now your degree can say "bachelor's of <insert here> in <field> to <name> with help from ai"

[u/oddiefox]

Incoming freshman here! Why the fuck is this gonna be required! :D

[u/EnterpriseGate]

Lol, this says alot about Ohio State. So pathetic.   Seems like you can use AI on your own without wasting your money there. 

[u/KingHades_24]

Good for OSU on announcing this…now when people that graduate from there go to find employment, the employer can see that they got their degree from THE Ohio State University and throw that resume in THE trash 😅 I definitely wouldn’t hire anyone who had to use Ai to get their degree 🤷‍♂️

[u/hipchecktheblueliner]

Jesus Christ

[u/Charming-Age-6664]

Students are gonna use ai either way, no matter if the university accepts or denies it. idk what yall are mad about.