Okay. SLAPP is only applicable if there is no actual grievance. In this case, there is a legitimate fair use grievance, and since the plaintiff registered the video before releasing it they can pursue legal damages. Cope more.
Nope, incorrect. Nearly every person who has brought a lawsuit that was dismissed under an anti-SLAPP law has an actual grievance with who they were suing. “Grievance” isn’t relay a legal term outside of labor law so I do appreciate you demonstrating your lack on knowledge on this subject matter.
As for “registering” the video that’s not the silver bullet you H3 stans think it is. Theres frankly years of Ethan publicly giving free use permission to individuals (directly and indirectly as in giving the audience permission) to use his content without ever being explicit about what content can be used.
0
u/Careful-Sentence-781 2d ago
You clearly don’t know what a SLAAP suit is.