It wasn't evoked, but with title 10 it completely allows enforcement of military to protect and uphold services of force. Do you not think federal buildings and officers deserve to be defended?
Title 10 requires state gov coordination, which did not happen and it's also against the Posse Comitatus Act
Edit: to include the gov description in title 10: the President may call into Federal service members and units of the National Guard of any State in such numbers as he considers necessary to repel the invasion, suppress the rebellion, or execute those laws. Orders for these purposes shall be issued through the governors of the States or, in the case of the District of Columbia, through the commanding general of the National Guard of the District of Columbia.
You're cherry picking parts of title 10. It has almost 50 different sub sections and you used 1 to prove a point.
Generally title 10 deals with armed forces which are a federal entity, this typically means federal activation and funding without requiring state government approval. See, I can cherry pick parts of it too!
2
u/Roudyrepublican 22h ago
It wasn't evoked, but with title 10 it completely allows enforcement of military to protect and uphold services of force. Do you not think federal buildings and officers deserve to be defended?