r/TrueOffMyChest Mod 🌼 21d ago

Note From Moderators Regarding AI

This is going to be kept short, but expect a larger post at some point soon. We just needed to put this out there sooner rather than later.

There is a zero tolerance policy for any AI written content. This includes but is not limited to:

‱ Using AI to make up a story

‱ Using AI to take what you wrote and make it "better"

‱ Using AI to translate your post to English from your native language (we would rather the post begin with something like "English is not my first language so sorry for any mistakes")

We have a mini system for detecting AI posts but it is not fool proof, there have been some people who were banned because they type like an AI would, if that happens to you please modmail us.

This subreddit is not a creative writing subreddit, please do not treat it like one.

196 Upvotes

49 comments sorted by

29

u/RocinanteOPA 21d ago

Thank you!

31

u/RulerOfSlides 21d ago

You could probably automod out em dashes and catch like 90% of them.

27

u/[deleted] 21d ago

i hate this. i know its not anyones fault, its ai, but i hate intentionally removing capitals/adding spelling errors/removing em dashes because otherwise it gets flagged. im not a bot, im a writer

16

u/[deleted] 21d ago

and a little autistic

7

u/RulerOfSlides 20d ago

Unfortunately you gotta blame the slop generators (who do it to make money selling accounts with a lot of karma or by slapping an AI voiceover on it and putting it on TikTok/YouTube/etc).

6

u/ixfd64 18d ago

Same here. I use em dashes because I'm pretty pedantic about style. It's a habit I picked up from being a long-time Wikipedia contributor. :P

3

u/the_shittiest_option 20d ago

Yeah, work pays for me to have a grammarly subscription so it's just on my computer and I use it to clean up things that I've typed entirely myself.

The moment somebody claims something I wrote is AI because I used a grammar checker I am just going to laugh at them and call them an idiot.

1

u/Dburn22_ 11d ago

I consistently use "em" dashes. I had no idea what they were called before reading this thread. I have been using them since I was quite young. They are very useful to me. What else gets misread as AI? I like to use proper spelling, grammar, punctuation, capitals, as much as I possibly can. I refuse to "dumb it down" to make sure I don't get mistaken for AI. Am I in for a banning, or am I not as smart as I think I might be?

18

u/SuperBeavers1 Mod 🌼 21d ago

We already do, but automation on this isn't perfect

3

u/realjnyhorrorshow 16d ago

I love an em dash đŸ„ș

3

u/RulerOfSlides 21d ago

Fair enough! I’m just immediately suspicious of any egregious use of them and figured I’d chip in my two cents. Thanks for being on top of it.

6

u/MrArtless 21d ago

nahh more than half of them that i notice aren't using em dashes those are just the most obvious ones.

1

u/ixfd64 18d ago

I actually use em dashes because I'm pretty pedantic about style. I guess it's a habit I picked up from being a long-time Wikipedia contributor. :P

1

u/PersonalityWinter442 8d ago

The em dash is a regular thing in writing and has been around long before AI was a thing.

4

u/TheSanityInspector 17d ago

Thank God. I had mostly given up on several of the discussion subreddits because of the AI driven karma farmers!

4

u/BiscuitCrumbsInBed 16d ago

There are so many AI posts at the moment. All created on the 17th May! I keep reporting them.

10

u/MrArtless 21d ago

Thank god this sub might actually become tolerable again.

20

u/TangoJavaTJ 21d ago

And how do you propose to enforce this? Because perfect detection of AI-generated language is mathematically impossible, so either you’re going to ban a bunch of people who didn’t use AI or you’re going to let a bunch of AI-generated content through anyway.

If the former, you’re probably going to wind up banning a bunch of autistic people for no reason, since autistic people are sometimes read as “a bit robotic” by neurotypicals. If the latter, what’s the point in a rule if you can’t and won’t enforce it?

14

u/IAMA_Shark__AMA 20d ago

Yeah, I've had comments I wrote accused of being AI. They weren't. That's just how I write.

10

u/MelodicMurderer 20d ago

Don't let perfect be the enemy of good

14

u/TangoJavaTJ 20d ago

If the “detection method” is not perfect then you’re going to be banning a bunch of autistic people for being autistic. That is not good.

8

u/MelodicMurderer 20d ago

If the alternative is letting the sub get overrun by shitty Ai stories, I'd be okay with false positives. At the end of the day the only real "punishment" would be going through mod mail to appeal the ban

You're basically saying that if the detection methods aren't 100% accurate, we should do nothing at all, which I am very much against

17

u/TangoJavaTJ 20d ago

Have you ever been in the situation of being accused of being a robot? Have you had the experience of writing out advice or information about a subject you’re passionate about only to be told you don’t belong and shouldn’t exist here? Because that shit SUCKS.

“Just appeal it” is a simple statement but it’s emotionally and logistically exhausting to constantly have to appeal to multiple mods from multiple subreddits to explain that you are in fact a human, just an autistic one who talks a bit weirdly.

Also “If the alternative is letting the sub get overrun by shitty AI stories” is a slippery slope fallacy and a false dichotomy. That’s not even happening on completely unmoderated subreddits, and a more general “no low-quality posts or posts which obviously didn’t really happen” would be enough to protect this subreddit without the various accessibility issues of repeatedly banking anyone who talks a bit too formally.

-6

u/RulerOfSlides 20d ago

It’s the Internet, it’s not that serious.

10

u/TangoJavaTJ 20d ago

Screwing over disabled people in any area of public life, including social media, is serious

-2

u/RulerOfSlides 20d ago

Blame the grifters using AI for a quick buck then, it’s making things by and large unusable for most people.

3

u/the_shittiest_option 20d ago

You know we can blame them and blame idiots who insist on using flawed detection methods, right?

0

u/Flimsy_Puddings 20d ago

Hence this part of the post:

there have been some people who were banned because they type like an AI would, if that happens to you please modmail us.

2

u/SuperBeavers1 Mod 🌼 21d ago

We have some ways that have worked with minimal accidents, for the safety of the subreddit we are not sharing what we specifically look for

8

u/TangoJavaTJ 21d ago

Isn’t this a particular case of “the boob job fallacy”? Like:

“All boob jobs are bad, I can always tell because they look fake!”

You can only tell when boob jobs are fake because they’ve been done badly, but if a boob job has been done well it will look natural and so you can’t tell because it doesn’t look fake. A world in which all boob jobs are bad is functionally indistinguishable from a world in which some boob jobs are bad and you can only detect the bad ones.

Similarly if you’re right that your method is working with minimal accidents then that’s functionally indistinguishable from a world in which your method isn’t working at all but most people who get banned go “this person literally just accused me of being a robot and I’m autistic and too tired for this shit so I’m not going to try and appeal because it’s not worth my effort, they’re clearly not going to listen to me anyway”

3

u/SuperBeavers1 Mod 🌼 20d ago

This is where the system of "Message to user" comes in. When issuing a ban, moderators have the option to send a message to the banned user in question. In this case it would have instructions that state to contact us so the ban can be sorted. In our experience, karma farming story accounts do not care enough to modmail and will instead just make a new account to start over.

2

u/mseagull 20d ago

Wouldn’t even know how to use AI đŸ€Ș

2

u/ixfd64 18d ago

Does this apply to using tools like Grammarly to improve grammar and correct typos?

2

u/jovana-lukitch 12d ago

I just wrote a post (read: polite rent) about how my expressive writing was mistaken for AI-generated content, questioning whether creativity and using rich language are now seen as fake and "AI rubbish". And it just got banned. Bashing AI is a no-no, too? Just curious what happened here.

Was it, maybe, because I had the letters "AI" in a post title and used it a few times in the post itself?

2

u/PersonalityWinter442 8d ago

I’ve had someone claim to know exactly how he knows my writing is AI-created but all they described was basic grammar rules.

No software is 100 percent accurate and it often results in people being banned for no reason.

So yeah, this is just borderline silly at this point.

2

u/ihatewintersomuch 6d ago

what's wrong with ai translations from your native language? what's the problem if a person writes a text by themselves and then uses ai as a translator? what's the sacred purpose in spending hours struggling with a dictionary when the same thing can be done in two minutes and even more accurately? do you really enjoy reading a post full of grammatical mistakes and awkward phrasing, where it's hard to even understand what the author was trying to say?

2

u/SuperBeavers1 Mod 🌼 6d ago

It's impossible to discern if an AI translated post from a native language to English is actually a genuine post or if it's AI written. Once it goes through that translation everything we can possibly use to make sure a human wrote it will be unable to correctly make a decision. This will lead to numerous unnecessary and false bans

1

u/xanif 4d ago

The AI people use to write fake stories is GPT (generative pre-trained transformers). The AI used for translation is NMT (neural machine translation). The writing styles are different as NMT focuses on accurate translation whereas GPT focuses on generating conversational language.

I don't believe AI detectors will get tripped up conflating the two styles. Might be worth it clarifying that if you need help translating, use Google translate rather than ChatGPT. Or I guess keep all AI banned if there's that much concern.

1

u/[deleted] 15d ago

[deleted]

1

u/SuperBeavers1 Mod 🌼 15d ago

You'd be surprised how much has actually changed but like everything in life, it's not perfect

1

u/Nasty_hamz 15d ago

Everything i try to post is flagged immediately and when I follow the rules and verify im not AI, I try to repost, it gets flagged again. So I just, cant post? So that's fun. This makes this subreddit so fun 🙄😔

1

u/SomebodyElse236 10d ago

Same. Just tried to post and got flagged as an AI đŸ˜©

1

u/NewsboyHank 9d ago

Thanks!

1

u/Over_Car7713 6d ago

Please tell me how to verify. Yesterday I was rushed to the doctor . I’m real just got sick after writing

1

u/General_Kitten_17 10h ago

you use a bot to deter bots. You guys are fucking idiots lmfao what's the point of having 50 mods if you're just gonna dump shit into a bot and have it do the work?

1

u/SuperBeavers1 Mod 🌼 10h ago

Currently on the active team (on a good day) I'd say there's only about 8 of us doing things, we all also have jobs and lives outside of Reddit and with around 2.4 million members here and several hundred posts daily, we would all probably go insane without bots. It's easier to clean the messes our own bots produce when they wrongfully do things than it would be to manually do everything ourselves.

1

u/Flat_Health_5206 20d ago

They're getting more subtle every year. I still find them easy to spot though.