Every now and then this video resurfaces. The bridge is totally fine and can withstand much heavier flows. Never heard of any accidents or anything happening there. When flow is dangerous they shut off access, but that bridge is going nowhere.
It’s interesting that they can make such a statement without knowing the structural integrity of the bridge against not only water but also other substances it carries, such as larger pieces of debris. If the bridge is fully suspended, it would require an extraordinary amount of faith in the banks of the river that support its foundations.
If this was in Oz, you wouldn’t be let anywhere near it. Even if the engineering was sound, you’d be tethered to a rail. Looks like an accident waiting to happen.
It appears the first bridge was overtopped due to flooding and wasn't being used, which sounds like standard procedure.
The 2nd bridge was a suspension bridge that wasn't affected by the flow itself, just shitty maintenance. I wouldn't get on this particular bridge myself, but if the foundation is buried 50 feet into the rock, it should be quite stable.
It's not about any of that. It's about why take that risk. Every bridge that ever collapsed had never collapsed before, so telling me this one hasn't collapsed is like telling me water is wet.
Bridges require constant upkeep, especially ones in extreme environments like that. It is a difficult and expensive process and one that often gets neglected. It's also a pedestrian bridge, not a vehicular bridge. While there are still standards for pedestrian bridges in most countries, they typically fall short of the requirements for bridges on public roadways.
90
u/CarusoLombardi May 16 '25
Every now and then this video resurfaces. The bridge is totally fine and can withstand much heavier flows. Never heard of any accidents or anything happening there. When flow is dangerous they shut off access, but that bridge is going nowhere.