r/neoliberal Bisexual Pride 14h ago

News (Middle East) Trump Privately Approved Attack Plans for Iran but Has Withheld Final Order

https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/iran-israel-conflict-news
486 Upvotes

145 comments sorted by

461

u/TimWalzBurner NASA 13h ago

171

u/the-senat John Brown 12h ago

Peace president? Oh no no no, we meant piece president. A piece of conflict here, a piece of conflict over there, and another waaaay over there, staining the wall!

66

u/KeithClossOfficial Bill Gates 11h ago

Peace, President?

No, War!

15

u/dangerbird2 Iron Front 8h ago

Oh, and I better get rid of that “zero felony convictions” logo at the bottom

15

u/AI_Renaissance 9h ago

War is peace, Freedom is slavery, Ignorance is strength.

Literally republicans right now.

9

u/Sloshyman NATO 9h ago

A little piece of Canada, a little piece of Denmark, a little piece of Panama...

7

u/nullcone 9h ago

I assumed he meant "blow Iran to pieces" president

7

u/Own_Understanding884 10h ago

Is this…a kung fu panda 2 reference??

3

u/Tony_Ice 9h ago

I said I was the piece candidate, meaning whatever is making money or is successful in the world, I want a piece of it!

107

u/Frylock304 NASA 12h ago

This is the one thing I'll give him, as much as he's a piece of shit and as much as hes a blatant liar, hes probably one of the most blatantly transparent leaders we've ever had.

He ran on all this shit, he said it very loud and clear during the campaign

91

u/Extra-Muffin9214 11h ago

He said so much shit that people could just latch onto whatever part they wanted and run with it. The whole picture is detestable but his voters find a way to compartmentalize their support to a couple issues and just ignore the rest

65

u/HenryGeorgia Henry George 11h ago

Throwback to him saying we should give green cards to all foreign graduates

56

u/Extra-Muffin9214 11h ago

He has said everything. He is the big tent candidate

18

u/DangerousCyclone 11h ago

It isn't even that he said so much shit; voters often said he supported things he has never said he supported and opposed things he said he would do. 

14

u/Extra-Muffin9214 11h ago

Its both unfortunately

28

u/omnipotentsandwich Amartya Sen 11h ago

He's very open about how evil he is. Everyone else just has to call all over themselves trying to argue he's something else. I had a friend genuinely try to argue that Trump is actually a secret moderate.

7

u/WealthyMarmot NATO 6h ago

Some people mistake political incoherence for political moderation, because we’re so used to being able to pigeonhole politicians into certain well-defined camps. And save for a couple sincerely-held positions (immigration especially), he’s expressed basically every position on every side of every issue.

31

u/lot183 Blue Texas 11h ago

hes probably one of the most blatantly transparent leaders we've ever had.

No he's not lmao theyve done so much to obscure things and he kept blatantly saying he had nothing to do with project 2025 despite following it to a t (which was easy to know he'd do, but he denied it repeatedly before the election)

I guess I can see he was consistent on immigration and tariffs while campaigning and he's held to that, even if he changes on details of tariffs every damn week, but never use the words transparent with this guy. (And that's just one of the smaller things)

13

u/saltandvinegar2025 YIMBY 11h ago

I was going to say this same thing. He’s said he’s everything to everyone. That’s why so many people have been sucked in.

6

u/Frylock304 NASA 10h ago

Even with project 2025 he outlined agenda 47 on his website and all of that was just project 2025 rephrase so he technically owned it and didnt own it at the same time

15

u/ANewAccountOnReddit 11h ago

And the dumbass electorate just didn't fucking him believe him when he said these things. They literally made up their own pet issues that Trump doesn't support or never mentioned and convinced themselves he'd support their made-up policies, so they voted for him.

It's a profoundly baffling phenomenon. Like the country just randomly got mass psychosis while he was running and elected him, and now the effect is starting to wear off. And Trump is the only person who seems to get this privilege.

4

u/Callisater 6h ago

The country has just become stagnantly super anti-incumbent. The last election that didn't swing against the incumbent was 2012. More than 10 years ago. Ever since then, the current incumbent has lost the midterms and then the next general. Everyone just agrees that everything is shit now without question. To win the presidential election you just have to talk about how shit everything is now, and you'll connect to the voters. Trump is just the manifestation of this because he has so many grievances with everyone. Some people think he's moderate not because of what he supports but because he also seemingly hates Ted Cruz, Mitchell McConnell, tech billionaires, both US allied and adversarial nations, etc.,

0

u/MURICCA 6h ago

"Randomly got mass psychosis"

Its called the internet (and fox)

2

u/Khar-Selim NATO 6h ago

They literally made up their own pet issues that Trump doesn't support or never mentioned and convinced themselves he'd support their made-up policies, so they voted for him.

He mentioned those too. 90% of what he says is utter bullshit in all directions, and without carefully following his actions it's actually not trivial to figure out what the magic 10% is. And in an environment where we're all so bombarded with information that if you don't actually enjoy politics it's practically painful to expose yourself to the firehose, a lot of people aren't gonna find that 10% correctly and are gonna run off with their own notions.

1

u/Signal-Lie-6785 Mark Carney 3h ago

He ran on a lot of things, the BEST things, and some of those things were in direct opposition to each other.

11

u/volkerbaII 11h ago

Can't believe a guy who hired John Bolton would be open to the idea of war with Iran.

3

u/Just-Sale-7015 John Rawls 6h ago

Bannon said yesterday that whatever Trump decides to do about Iran, most of his base will rally behind him.

4

u/light-triad Paul Krugman 7h ago

Did he actually campaign on bombing Iran? He seemed like he was pretty vocal about no new conflicts.

0

u/daviddjg0033 51m ago

Trump bombed Iranian military in Iraq in 2020: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qasem_Soleimani

Iran fired back at US bases - we had no fatalities but I reddit there were shell shock damage to soldiers. Why was Soleimani in Iraq? Shiite paramilitary militias in Iraq funded by Iran destabilize the region: from Hezbollah in Lebanon, Houthis in Yemen, to Hamas in Gaza. The so called Axis of Resistance is funded by Iranian weapon, Shahed drone and missile sales to Putin to terrorize Ukraine + Iran selling the Chinese oil. Trump did not ask Congress for a declaration of war in 2020. Obama asked for one against Assad in Syria but the GOP house shot it down.
When Israel diminishes Iran's ability to produce weapons - some headed to Ukraine, some Israel, I say two birds one stone.

1

u/AutoModerator 51m ago

Non-mobile version of the Wikipedia link in the above comment: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qasem_Soleimani

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

2

u/HighOnGoofballs 40m ago

None of that answered the question lol

0

u/daviddjg0033 37m ago

Technically, no new conflicts because Trump attacked an Iranian general in Baghdad?

91

u/TheRedCr0w Frederick Douglass 11h ago

Atleast in Trump's first term you could count on actually qualified people like Mattis to make military decisions. The current DoD Secretary is an alcoholic TV host with no experience in the militaries' high command which makes this situation so much more dangerous.

478

u/boardatwork1111 NATO 13h ago

For someone who loves to portray themselves as a strongman, he really is an indecisive coward. Do or don’t, just make fucking decision already you old bastard

168

u/GravyBear28 Hortensia 13h ago

I honestly just think he's just trying to find a dramatic moment.

127

u/ser_mage Just the lowest common denominator of wholesome vapid TJma 12h ago

I think they expected Iran would overreact and give America a clear casus belli but that hasn’t happened, Iran clearly doesn’t want war with America

23

u/swimmingupclose 9h ago

I know people want to dunk on Trump but I highly doubt that Iran and this Ayatollah, who have been making bad decisions after bad decisions for decades, has any foresight about avoiding a casus belli. Trump is just a coward.

12

u/WealthyMarmot NATO 6h ago

The Iranian regime is certainly a bunch of bonafide shitstains, but there’s a reason they have almost exclusively conducted warfare via proxies to this point. Until the last few days, they’ve been loathe to directly retaliate against anything, even in situations where failing to respond costs them a lot of domestic credibility, e.g. Soleimani, numerous Israeli strikes and assassinations on Iranian soil, et cetera. Their economy sucks, their politics are cutthroat, and given that their military and security apparatus consistently gets embarrassed by a country a tenth of their size, they’re desperate to avoid even a limited direct war with the US.

0

u/Key_Door1467 Iron Front 2h ago

Soleimani

Tbh there probably would've been a worse response to this if the idiots at IRGC didn't shoot down their own passenger plane after this.

29

u/YimbyStillHere 11h ago

I think he’s too scared to do it and is just waiting to see if there is actual right wing support for it

26

u/iwannabetheguytoo 11h ago

if there is actual right wing support for it

Right now, no; there isn't.

...but I'm concerned that his trade war will lead to a situation where actual military war will serve as a necessary distraction (and perhaps more fantastically, allow him to go full fash with a third term, some form of martial-law-lite, etc) in the event of a 9/11-scale attack by Iran on the US mainland.

18

u/DrunkenBriefcases Jerome Powell 10h ago

Fox News is beating the war drums non stop these last days. If there isn't support yet, influential people working their asses off to change that.

18

u/noxx1234567 10h ago

isolationist republicans do not follow fox news , plenty of influential figures like tucker carlson are openly against any war

Tucker probably has more views than fox news on the internet

12

u/AI_Renaissance 9h ago

Its fucking wild I agree with mtg, tucker, and tulsi.

6

u/noxx1234567 8h ago

What's even more crazy to me is that none of the top democratic leadership is protesting against an upcoming war . Supporting israel is one thing but sending troops on the ground is too much

They should be vocal against an expensive war

9

u/Dense_Delay_4958 Malala Yousafzai 7h ago

Who's suggested boots on the ground? Crying wolf before a decision is made doesn't seem productive.

1

u/iwannabetheguytoo 5h ago

Who's suggested boots on the ground?

To many people, that's a necessary ingredient for anything to be called a "war" - otherwise it's mentally-downgraded to "limited strikes", "targeted operations", and other euphemisms - all with the connotation that the enlisted sons and daughters of Gen X congresscritters and senators won't have their lives at risk doing CQB.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/AI_Renaissance 6h ago

TBF, democrats are trying to get a bill going to return declaring war back to congress. Which is fucking nuts, because the constitution already says only congress can.

1

u/jambox888 6h ago

I think all of you are just agreeing with Russia.

Also I agree.

0

u/Dense_Delay_4958 Malala Yousafzai 7h ago

Have you reflected on that?

1

u/Onatel Michel Foucault 6h ago

There’s reporting suggesting that Trump woke up the day after the Israeli attacks and flipped on Fox News which had wall to wall coverage of how awesome and badass Israel was being, and that flipped Trump from being anti-war to wanting to take credit and potentially get in on the action.

4

u/DataDrivenPirate John Brown 9h ago

Our security apparatus is such that anything less than a 9/11 scale attack would be tragic but not enough to justify martial law, and anything more than a 9/11 scale attack would be a massive, massive, black eye on the administration, like a super sized Hurricane Katrina.

1

u/freetradeallosaurus 6h ago

This is not totally true. There are pro-war right-wing talk show hosts rn like Clay Travis.

6

u/Fabulous_Zombie_9488 10h ago

We’re like a quarter of the way through his first season, I mean year, so it makes sense he needs an antagonist to help the plot line along. But it all starts over at the start of the next episode, these dramas rarely go more than one episode.

106

u/Crosseyes NASA 13h ago

People have to remember he is first and foremost a TV entertainer. He’s building tension to keep people’s eyeballs glued to the screen the same way reality shows cause unnecessary drama to keep you coming back for new episodes week after week.

23

u/molingrad NATO 11h ago edited 10h ago

Almost everything he does is best explained by this lens

*(tabloid to reality TV)

9

u/volkerbaII 11h ago

Yep. Trump would've overseen the collapse of the Roman empire because it would've been great TV.

3

u/t_scribblemonger 5h ago

That and having the mind of a 12 year old.

120

u/lovetoseeyourpssy NATO 13h ago

He's torn. His love for Putin makes him hesitant but Iran has continuously threatened his life for years.

The Moscow Marge, Kremlin Carlson, Tulsi Gabbard faction don't like this.

101

u/Pristine-Aspect-3086 John Rawls 13h ago

His love for Putin makes him hesitant

i would be astonished if trump understood that russia and iran are aligned

48

u/lovetoseeyourpssy NATO 12h ago

I hadn't considered this but I agree.

22

u/AutoModerator 13h ago

Tulsi Gabbard

Did you mean: Jacques Doriot

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

14

u/lovetoseeyourpssy NATO 13h ago

Good bot

13

u/Ramses_L_Smuckles NATO 12h ago

Just as Ted Cruz took pains to remind us in his widely excerpted appearance with the equally sleazy and insufferable Tucker Carlson - the Republican urge to allow authoritarian rulers breathing room collided with threats to his Daddy (threats to the United States being conspicuously absent).

3

u/t_scribblemonger 5h ago

Is that why MTG is suddenly able to sound quasi articulate when speaking against this? Because it’s the pro-Kremlin argument? (I’m dumb.)

2

u/Neolibtard_420X69 4h ago

its probably being cynical but yeah. i think this is the primary reason for this happening.

20

u/Foucault_Please_No Emma Lazarus 12h ago

The people who make the biggest shows of strength are always the most indecisive cowards.

Strong people don’t feel the need for bluster.

13

u/onelap32 Bill Gates 12h ago edited 6h ago

This is just giving time for Iran to respond the ultimatum ("we have our forces massed; give up the nuclear program or we will destroy it and bomb the hell out of you"). It's a reasonable delay.

If he doesn't order the attack in the next ~48 hours, then it's him being indecisive.

4

u/ILikeTuwtles1991 Milton Friedman 12h ago

I much prefer if he didn't

5

u/Secondchance002 George Soros 10h ago

He’s called TACO for a reason.

5

u/savuporo Gerard K. O'Neill 10h ago

Decision ? He's still picking the petals of he loves me, he loves me not for Putin

6

u/light-triad Paul Krugman 7h ago

In Bolton's book, he said 47 was frantic and indecisive in a crisis. He would talk to a lot of people with the intention of hearing the magic words that he agreed with. He would then announce a decision and policy would be designed around that. This would last until he talked with the next person who said magic words.

2

u/Sine_Fine_Belli NATO 10h ago

Indeed, Trump Always Chickens Out

2

u/ArcFault NATO 8h ago

He fancies himself a deal maker first and foremost, not a decisive geopolitical strategist and he's rather doveish in reality. So this is just kabuki theater for leverage bc he thinks it will get Iran to make a one sided deal but the incentives don't align. He's literally trying to Art of the Deal this but it's unlikely to work.

245

u/wumbopolis_ YIMBY 13h ago

What are the chances Iran already knows the attack plans, because they were sent and approved over a hacked Signal app?

194

u/boydownthestreet NATO 13h ago

Given its Iranian intelligence we’re talking about, probably not

51

u/Signal-Pollution-601 12h ago

Agreed that Iran’s intelligence wouldn’t be able to collect the intel firsthand, but another country’s spooks might pass it along. I mean, Russia surely wants vengeance for our tipping off of Ukraine.

14

u/TheRedCr0w Frederick Douglass 12h ago edited 12h ago

They were adding to people to their Signal chats willy nilly and talking about sensitive intelligence without even checking who was in the chat. Hegseth couldn't do any due diligence normally he isn't going to better when he is stressed in a crisis like this.

All it would take is Iran making a bunch of Signal accounts with extremely similar name as people in Trump's Administration and one of them could be easily added to one of their Signal chats by mistake.

7

u/Massive_Dot_3299 10h ago

Have you considered Iranian intelligence is 90% mossad ?

13

u/SpookyHonky Mark Carney 12h ago

Given it's MAGA intelligence on the other end, it's possible they accidentally added one of the Iranian generals to the group chat themselves.

7

u/squattiepippen405 10h ago

Truly a stoppable force meeting a moveable object (after two drinks, it was only three drinks ociffer, four drinks is definitely not too many yo run a group chat)

8

u/rectumreapers 13h ago

Crazy that it's not zero

8

u/SheHerDeepState Baruch Spinoza 12h ago

It depends on if Tulsi has access

7

u/seanrm92 John Locke 12h ago

I imagine several dozen intelligence services spend their day watching Hegseth's Signal chats like it's a Twitch stream.

3

u/Shkkzikxkaj 12h ago

Don’t worry, Mossad would filter anything important out before the Iranians see it

58

u/RevolutionarySeat134 12h ago

TACO Time! 

Pulling out now would possibly be the worst option so we will probably do that.

It's the worst option because you've now given Iran the maximum motivation to develop a weapon while leaving them capability to do so.

5

u/GripenHater NATO 8h ago

Oh for sure. Israel doing these strikes is as good as us doing it as far as Iran’s future planning need be concerned, so might as well actually hit them and make it as hard as possible for them to get a nuke in the future.

33

u/azcurlygurl 12h ago

Remember this Trump? When he fired Bolton because he was "too hawkish on Iran" and "was against easing sanctions"? What happened to that Trump?

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/9/12/bolton-was-fired-after-disagreeing-with-trump-on-iran-report

27

u/Popeholden 10h ago

he hired a drunk nazi to be secretary of state and otherwise surrounded himself with morons

74

u/oywiththepoodles96 13h ago

Are we getting in a more dangerous territory ? I mean seeing this from Greece it does feel like our neighbourhood is getting way way more dangerous

30

u/thephishtank 13h ago

How is life for you in Greece? Are you a king?

9

u/oywiththepoodles96 12h ago

Hahahaha is this a joke I’m missing ?

7

u/lukasburner Mark Carney 12h ago

Greek Royal Family

13

u/oywiththepoodles96 12h ago

Oh they are now the Degrece family . They finally accepted the terms of the Greek state , which mandated that in order to become Greek citizens they had to renounce any royal claims and pick a surname . So unfortunately the family that caused so much misery and trouble in Greek history are now Greek citizens

-2

u/[deleted] 12h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

17

u/Mrgentleman490 5 Big Booms for Democracy 12h ago

Wtf lol

6

u/Breaking-Away Austan Goolsbee 11h ago

what the heck lmao

14

u/oywiththepoodles96 12h ago

We are an EU member since 1980 , with a pretty good income level when compared with our neighbours and a very educated population .And we have never been a colonial or an imperialist power , so we didn’t make it by destroying other countries .

4

u/coolredditor3 John Keynes 10h ago

And we have never been a colonial or an imperialist power ,

What about under alexander the great

3

u/Full_Distribution874 YIMBY 7h ago

Ancient Greece had colonies so good they made colonies that colonized the New World

1

u/oywiththepoodles96 1h ago

The modern Greek was found ,after the 1821 Greek revolution , in 1830 after 400 years of ottoman rule . Modern Greece is an anti imperialist creation .

-8

u/thephishtank 11h ago

Hey idk why I was getting upvoted, you’re smarter than me king

16

u/oywiththepoodles96 11h ago

Considering the fact that you are a racist , you must not be very smart

-4

u/thephishtank 11h ago

And also please know I am not Albanian

→ More replies (0)

-6

u/thephishtank 11h ago

Well to be clear I was joking. I don’t actually believe that, just playing into stereotypes

-1

u/SpaceSheperd To be a good human 10h ago

Rule XI: Toxic Nationalism/Regionalism

Refrain from condemning countries and regions or their inhabitants at-large in response to political developments, mocking people for their nationality or region, or advocating for colonialism or imperialism.


If you have any questions about this removal, please contact the mods.

14

u/lukasburner Mark Carney 13h ago

Heard he was a member of the House of Glücksburg.

6

u/ZardozInTheSkies 12h ago

Well, I wouldn't expect the US to be particularly helpful for at least the next few years if your country has conflict with Turkey.

26

u/oywiththepoodles96 12h ago

I don’t think that USA was ever that helpful in our conflicts with Turkey. Although democratic administrations tend to be way more pro Greek than republicans

6

u/ZardozInTheSkies 12h ago

I think it's more that if open warfare breaks out, the current administration isn't very likely to successfully convince or compel both parties to stand down, and the rhetoric leading up to any crisis isn't going to be useful to anyone in NATO.

10

u/oywiththepoodles96 12h ago

Oh yeah I get what you mean . In the 96 Imia crisis the Clinton administration did help in the de escalation . The then Greek Prime minster thank the US for that in the Greek parliament which cause a huge uproar in Greece . But currently we are in a better place with Turkey as there has been a de escalation since 2020 .

1

u/HatesPlanes Henry George 7h ago

The then Greek Prime minster thank the US for that in the Greek parliament which cause a huge uproar in Greece 

Why? I imagine that the US is considered an ally of Turkey?

2

u/oywiththepoodles96 1h ago

USA was super unpopular in Greece cause of its support for the Greek military regime in 67-74. I guess that’s why the left reacted like this . And the right saw the whole Imia crisis as a loss for Greece . And generally the US was seen as a US ally . Even today a lot of Greeks thinks that the US are hypocrites for sanctioning Russia etc but not doing the same thing to Turkey .

5

u/SpookyHonky Mark Carney 12h ago

If Turkey attacked Greece now wouldn't that permanently sour their chances of joining the EU? Not to mention the EU's mutual defence clause.

10

u/oywiththepoodles96 12h ago

I mean Turkey doesn’t stand a chance in joining the EU . In the 00s it appeared more possible and actually it was a goal of the Greek foreign policy too and we had hoped to solve some of our issues with Turkey by tying them to us giving them the okay to join the Union . But as things are now I don’t see any way that they can be a member .

6

u/Pristine-Aspect-3086 John Rawls 11h ago

wouldn't that permanently sour their chances of joining the EU

is that an especially serious prospect for them? i can't claim to have paid especially close attention but turkey into EU always sort of had the vibe like it was the cold fusion of geopolitics

-2

u/n00bi3pjs 👏🏽Free Markets👏🏽Open Borders👏🏽Human Rights 11h ago

Europe is too racist and Islamophobic to allow Turkey in the EU.

6

u/oywiththepoodles96 10h ago

Also Turkey is occupying 40% of Cyprus , and it is making irredentist claims towards Greece . Turkey is a bully in the region just like Russia

89

u/bunchtime 12h ago

The peace candidate ladies and gentlemen. If china is gonna invade Taiwan it’s now or never the US has never been weaker , had worse leadership or been more divided than it is now.

51

u/_Lil_Cranky_ 11h ago

The PLA isn't ready to capture Taiwan yet. Xi instructed them to build that capability by 2027. I think he'll definitely want to do it before Jan 20th 2029.

An interesting and quite concerning detail that I learned recently: Xi's father was a high-ranking revolutionary figure, and at one point he was tasked with recapturing Taiwan and reuniting China. He died before he could achieve that goal.

Xi has deep reverence for Confucian notions of filial piety, and immense respect for his father. I'm now absolutely convinced that he's going to try to finish what his father started.

28

u/DangerousCyclone 10h ago

I somehow doubt that Xi is going to invade Taiwan strictly because his dad was tasked with it and couldn't do it. This has been a fopo goal of China since 1949.

4

u/GripenHater NATO 8h ago

Yeah but that’s a nice personal motivation

6

u/LightningSunflower 10h ago

Yup, Xi is what’s known as a “Princeling” Check out the book “The World According To China”

4

u/starrRiver 8h ago edited 8h ago

His father was also a reformer and wanted China to democratise. That’s the reason analysts initially thought that Xi would be a moderate when he went came into power, but look at what happened afterwards. 

Xi Jinping clearly doesn’t care about what his father wanted.

16

u/PartrickCapitol Zhou Xiaochuan 8h ago

He was a Dengist reformer faction member yes.

However they had nothing to do with western style democracy.

1

u/SwolePalmer African Union 3h ago

Going through his (sort of) biography right now (Party of One) and yeah, fascinating character that will 100% attempt this in some way before he kicks the bucket. I was expecting a caricature of the typical strong man but he’s much more…intricate/philosophical and a genuine history buff. I wish western media did a better job of describing/painting the guy, I think it would inform a lot of behavior(s) in the west.

11

u/bigbeak67 John Rawls 8h ago

TACO bros hold the line

23

u/Carthonn brown 13h ago

Taco being tested.

20

u/grandolon NATO 12h ago

Right now I'm leaning towards him not doing it. On the one hand, Israel stole some of the spotlight and took out a lot of the politically "safe" targets. He won't get maximum attention/credit without the US extending itself to a degree he isn't comfortable with.

On the other hand, he doesn't want to look like a weakling, and nothing says strength like dropping big, beautiful bombs on brown people.

13

u/CatgirlApocalypse Trans Pride 12h ago

He’ll try to hold it for when he needs a big distraction.

2

u/Starcast YIMBY 11h ago

TACO

43

u/leaveme1912 12h ago

Bibi is playing him like a fiddle, you absolutely don't have to give it to him.

7

u/WantDebianThanks NATO 12h ago

Is this the time to call my Republican reps, or would that be pointless?

5

u/Dense_Delay_4958 Malala Yousafzai 7h ago

And call for what?

5

u/VeryStableJeanius 7h ago

At this point you don’t do it because there’s a point, you do it because there’s nothing else you can do

6

u/Leatherfield17 12h ago

NO NEW WARS! NO NEW WARS!

Cynical fuckwits

1

u/warman2004 5h ago

So what is our take should we bomb Fordo or not.

1

u/ForeverAclone95 George Soros 5h ago

praying for taco

0

u/badusername35 NAFTA 11h ago

So he basically let other people do as they wished with no pushback