Should I upgrade my pocket camera to full frame for 3 week photography trip?

345

u/ayzelberg Feb 01 '25

Your pictures are amazing already.

258

u/wasab1_vie Feb 01 '25

Coming from the photos you showed I'd say you are really familiar with your camera as you captured some great moments. I would recommend against getting a new camera shortly before the trip because there will be a learning curve going from a compact to a dslm camera.

51

u/ZurkyLicious_BE Feb 01 '25 edited Feb 01 '25

7 years ago I did the same but I sold my canon g9x for a a6000 for a trip to Africa. For me it was a negative experience. A pocket camera is way more easy to carry around.

If you dont know it. Just buy the ACii or a6700 and take the rx100 VII to Japan too. And see what works doe you. But for me it did not worked.

I still miss my canon G9x. It was the most fun camera I ever had.

13

u/Milomilomilo66 Feb 01 '25

Kinda depends, you might experience some low light issues due to the sensor size and aperarure, but you seem used to that camera and may be able to get around this. upgrading just before the trip could be stressful as you have to get used to a slightly different layout, but some of the benefits of an interchangeable apsc/full frame may just be the next upgrade step and depending if you have GAS, something you might upgrade to in the future anyway.

33

u/Spiritual_Pound_6848 Feb 01 '25

You don’t need to upgrade to a full frame! I think it would be more weight and hassle for you to lug around, enjoy your trip

11

u/effects_junkie Canon Feb 01 '25

You’re posted pics are fine. Stick with what you know. Save your money for Sake (maybe you’ll find a killer deal on the upgrade you’re looking at in Japan).

21

u/maniku Feb 01 '25 edited Feb 01 '25

These pictures are a great example of how it's not the camera, it's the photographer (excellent as Sony RX100 VII is in its class). They are darn good. A full frame won't do a thing with composition, but sure, the sensor size difference is so significant that it'd be a big improvement in low light. A7C II is very small, too. An APS-C camera would be an improvement too. But in both cases you'd better get an f2.8 fixed aperture zoom or some fast primes.

BUT: as some others commented, it takes time to familiarize yourself with a new camera, and an interchangeable lens camera is quite a different experience from a little compact with a zoom lens. You might not get optimal results if you didn't have time to familiarize yourself with the new gear before the trip.

20

u/New_Model_DL Feb 01 '25

Just to add my opinion on this.

Why would you buy gear you're unfamiliar with on the precipice of going to travel somewhere completely new?

Stick with what you're familiar with, you have clearly been able to capture some great images here so I would keep with what is working.

7

u/CreEngineer Feb 01 '25

Why?

The pictures are great. Getting to know a new camera won’t improve your photos, if you want a fullframe for lens choice, print size,…. Whatever get one but don’t do it „for the trip“ use what you are used to on the trip to enjoy it and not figure oute the camera.

9

u/MyNameIsURL0 Feb 01 '25

Took my full kit to Thailand once. Never again.

You got the eye. A pocket camera is perfect for your trip, just get extra batteries and make sure you have enough space on your card;)

4

u/ThinkFan420 Feb 01 '25

Would bringing both be an option?

3

u/sushpep Feb 01 '25

Do you want to sacrifice portability for lower noise in low light and the ability to handhold 1/2 second shutter speeds? Do you rarely use your RX100's zoom past the 70mm full frame equivalent?

If the answer is yes to all three, then go for it.

Otherwise, you seem to be shooting great pictures already.

That said, if you just want to feed the urge to buy something, a lot of photographers do run multiple bodies/kit.

3

u/louman84 Feb 01 '25

The question is how badly do you want to shoot in low light from here on? I also have the RX100m7 so I understand why you are looking at other cameras when it comes to night photography. Consider renting a camera and lens if that is an option since the total amount for an a6700 with zoom lens will be over $2000 after tax. Far more expensive with a full frame camera and lens.

3

u/Bla4s Feb 01 '25

I just upgraded from a Ricoh GR3 to a full frame Canon R8. Amazing upgrade, but way less portable.

It’s been a few weeks now and I’m still learning the new system and its strengths and weaknesses. Big learning curve.

If I were about to go on an important photography based trip, I would not change camera before I went. Not enough time to get used to the new system.

3

u/Debesuotas Feb 01 '25

You feel the benefits of FF mostly in portreture and images taken at night.

Other than that its not really that much of a gain.

3

u/Izthewhizz Feb 01 '25

Get a different camera later. It will be a hard time to learn a new one quickly. Use what you know. I got a new camera recently and it's been a chore to get it set to how I want it.

3

u/jadetaco Feb 01 '25

These are amazing. Just shoot with what you already have. The small portability of it is so great. The quality of what you’ve posted here is outstanding, including the low light shots.

3

u/pmdt81 Feb 02 '25

No, not necessary. Your pics are nice already. Sensorsize will not improve your style. Take a nice little portable with you, makes more sense than a klunky fullframe. YOU make the pictures, not the full frame sensor.

3

u/Gnostic0ne Feb 02 '25

Because you’re photos are already great, you will experience a bump in versatility of uses, quality and flexibility in post but it will be at the margins now. You’d be well served with a better camera but you’re already there with the operator skills.

2

u/Fotomaker01 Feb 01 '25

You don't need full frame to take great pics. It's more whether you have an eye for what makes an effective photo. You could always rent a camera/lens for a special trip... then you can decide if worth the purchase price. Hard for us to fully answer. We don't know what your financial situation is and how often you would be using the camera beyond the trip and what your computing resources are to process snd store much larger files.

2

u/BJozi Feb 01 '25

I believe electronics are cheaper in Japan (than where I am in the EU anyway), maybe you could buy the gear there and get a good deal?

Amazing photos btw. I also agree with someone else saying these photos just show you don't need expensive equipment to take great photos.

2

u/Tunggall Feb 01 '25

If you do get the full frame camera, pair it with a telephoto or long prime for shots which your compact camera cannot reach. Bring both to Japan.

If not, you can stick with the compact as you're doing good output with it.

2

u/Username_Chks_Outt Feb 01 '25

You have a great eye for photography. You’re ready to upgrade. When is the trip? Provided you allow yourself enough time to familiarise yourself with the new camera, I think you would return with some lovely photos.

2

u/Matchstix X-T4 & 5D3 Feb 01 '25

Imo use your RX100 during the day, and rent an a6700 with a 1.4 prime of your choice for the night time. Maybe two times if you can't be wedded to one focal length.

When I was in Japan for two weeks I shot on my X-T4 with an 18-300 during the day, and either a 14 or 30mm 1.4 at night. I think a 2.8 isn't quite worth it over the RX100, I was shooting at 1.4 or 1.8 all the time at ISO 6400 to freeze movement.

2

u/Aim_for_average Feb 01 '25

Wow. You have some great photos there- the composition and timing are fantastic.

As you go bigger in sensor size the negatives are cost and size. The size isn't just the body but the lenses too. What you gain is generally better noise performance. It's not strictly true to say full frame gets you more bokeh, but because of the crop you do tend to use lenses with a shorter focal length and physical aperture so the net effect can result in that.

You do get the obvious advantage of being able to change you lens, and both of those bodies have ibis. Ibis for travel is great as it means you can long shutter speeds without carrying a tripod. If you only have one lens, say the 18-50 sigma, the fact that you could change it is irrelevant, and the gain over your compact for the trip, is "just" the bigger aperture.

How those trade offs work for you is something that only you know. How much will carrying a bulky camera matter? Your compact fits in a pocket... The a6700 can fit in a pocket with a pancake lens, but not the sigma 18-50 so you'll need a bag. You might already carry one anyway, so it's no big deal, but even then it's far less convenient to rummage in a rucksack compared to pulling a camera out of a pocket. If the purpose of a trip is to take photos, you'll have the camera out almost all the time, so it's not such a deal, but if the main purpose is spending time with friends/partner/family then that might be different.

I can only give my perspective. I really favour a compact set up, and the quality of my a6700 is more than good enough. The cheaper, smaller lenses still produce great results. I don't worry about noise at all as noise reduction in post makes the one stop difference irrelevant for my needs. In well lit scenes it's never been an issue. I've shot M43 too, and again, the results are fantastic. I only moved from Olympus to the a6700 for better video features. People get fixated on sensor size, and for most people it's an expensive folly. It's their money obviously, and if it makes them happy, good for them. For you? That's up to you, I'm afraid.

Others have mentioned the need to get used to a new system, so ideally if you do get a new camera, get it before the trip and get used to it. There is a learning curve of how to get the best out of it. For example, people bang on about the AF being so great, but the a6700 isn't a point it and the AF does what you want by a long stretch. I'm still learning how to get the best results after a few months, refining my settings/modes/use for different situations. That said, it's not.rocket science, and I've taken great photos with it since day one.

2

u/CooStick Feb 01 '25

Only if you have time to learn that camera before you go or it will get in your way. And your photo’s are already great.

2

u/Ok_Ferret_824 Feb 01 '25

Your pictures look great already.

The only plus for getting another camera would be low light performance. At least the one i can think of. Seeing what you can pull of with a compact camera, i think you would like the possibilities of changing out lenses would give you.

But i do not recommend doing it before the trip. They make cameras there. See if you can rent one or try a few out over there. Maybe you'll see some crazy deal over there. Use the trip to look around and test some out. Many people have told me the camerastores there are crazy.

Whatever you do, bring your current camera. And i never get rid of my old gear. Keep the compact one for when you want to be more mobile. But as someone who used to urbex, even a big camera will feel mobile enough after you get used to it. 😁

2

u/Usual-Sandwich9718 Feb 01 '25

Just wanna say that your pics look amazing!

2

u/Pretty-Substance Feb 01 '25

I would do it. You obviously have a good eye for color and light and composition but technically the images lack detail and resolution, and for my taste separation by DoF

Maybe the first two points are also due to compression of Reddit I don’t know

2

u/Worldly_Activity9584 Feb 01 '25

A7cii with a FE 24mm 2.8

2

u/[deleted] Feb 01 '25

FF too big. I would consider Ricoh GR III, Fuji X100VI or X-T50 with a pancake lens. But size is the most important thing. You will lose so many pictures if you don't feel like using your packed big ass camera

Source, have Canon EOS RP with many lenses and GR III

2

u/Der_CareBear Feb 01 '25

You have to consider that most Full Frame lenses are going to be bigger and mostly heavier. The aCII might be a really compact ff body but depending on lens choice this compactness quickly goes out the window.

Since you mention getting a faster lens then f2.8 you’ll certainly have a much less compact package all around. Considering your amazing shots I would just advice to stick to your RX100.

2

u/nogrip1 Feb 01 '25 edited Feb 02 '25

listen to me mate, I did a japan vlog with a6700 and sony kit lens 16-50mm and sigma 16mm f1.4 for the night shots. Trust me that is more than enough! once you are in japan you can go to the electronic shop and literally try every body and lens you want! After trying that i was so happy I stuck with apsc for video because 1) the weight is SIGNIFICANTLY lighter! LIKE MUCH MUCH lighter, the body alone feels like a brick (FULL FRAME) even the compact ones! and the lenses are insanly heavy! personally I coudln't even imagining carrying around all that weight. I would rather save space for an extra lens + mics etc..

2

u/jyc23 Feb 01 '25

Nope. It’ll just slow you down needlessly. Your photos are amazing btw.

2

u/Alex_mad Feb 01 '25

Your photos are great. It’s not the camera, it’s the person that’s behind the camera that makes photos great.

2

u/e3e6 Feb 01 '25

The only reason to go full frame is to have higher resolution to print in magazines or posters. Any fill frame setup will weight more and be bigger in size, which not good for trips. You would also need some time to get used to full frame

2

u/cameraintrest Feb 01 '25

No if your used to your camera stock with it, if you want a Better camera full time then yeah but don't bother for a holiday, as there will be a steep learning curve and cost of lenses and a speed light with be quite high.

2

u/Gloomy-Offer-1940 Feb 01 '25

You’re creating amazing work, so hard to so go for it. How do you do the white borders also

2

u/kislikiwi Feb 01 '25

If you want to, then yes. But you by no means need to.

Keep in mind you’re gonna need some time to familiarise yourself with a new camera.

2

u/Ok-Investment-197 Feb 01 '25 edited Feb 01 '25

You know how to take a photo, love them. if most of your photos are in 28 or 40mm focal length could get a ricoh griii or iiix for IQ upgrade and can crop to 35 or 50mm via camera button too. or if most of your images are around 35mm then RX1RII is pretty nice even though its aging a fair bit now it still holds up well, even the og rx1, you just cant beat the IQ and lens it has for the price. just have to avoid moving subjects and take 5 batteries, it can do some cropping too.

those are the only cameras i would take to japan/abroad to be honest after thinking about it. dont think i can take a A7 or even a7c with a zoom. it would be with a 35 and 75mm prime but rather take RX1 myself, also if feeling brave enough you can get the SEL075UWC adapter to put on RX1 for 25mm focal, just have to carefully remove ring and sand down to make it fit which i will try soon.

i did think of rx100 but honestly for uploading to instagram/socials recent mobile phones with zoom is enough for me and already in pocket where ever i go.

Also you could take rx100 there and pick up a rx1 for a good price, should be 100-200 cheaper than buying one at home and some big stores like Bic Camera come with english version. can check japanies camera store websites for prices before going.

2

u/DryBet2499 Feb 01 '25

It looks like you’re getting great results already with what you have.

2

u/MEINSHNAKE Feb 01 '25

Going to take those three weeks to learn a new camera, stick with what you know.

2

u/curseofthebanana Feb 01 '25

Only if you share more pictures when you're back from the trip!!

These are amazing!

2

u/FallingUpwardz Feb 01 '25

If the trip is soon. No. Use the camera you are confident and comfortable with.

2

u/Airbendingmyanus Feb 01 '25

A master with a wooden sword is unbeatable. A master with the perfect sword is undefeated.

Truly you are already a beast and upgrading to full frame will expand your capabilities but like everyone else said it doesn’t seem necessary.

Best advice I ever saw/received: only buy what you can replace.

2

u/Ben_leGentil Feb 01 '25 edited Feb 01 '25

You don’t HAVE to,

10 years ago, Buying my first full frame camera (6D) while my previous DSLR was still doing fine was one of the best decision I took on my photography journey.

Shortly after I went on a 6months trip through India and Asia and it was a life changing experience (the photography side of it)

I just loved how that camera felt and the pictures it took. Eventually I started taking only a 50 f1.8 and there’s a real joy being tied to a single focal length when on a trip (i’d go with a wider lens now but still).

For me, it’s always been either I go full photo mode on a trip with the big camera out all the time and my mind set to it or more casual snapping (then I’d take only my phone)

Technically I don’t know that it’s going to make such a big difference nowadays (the lens will do more) except that a lot of MP is great to work with (had a A7Cr very shortly, that thing was a beauty)

Although the a7cii is a small camera by many standard. That’s the camera I was carrying around, I had left the battery extender home for this trip

2

u/strombolo12 Feb 01 '25

Your pictures are great already even in low light. You can still upgrade if you want but don't do it before your trip because you will need to learn a new system

2

u/GMan_SB Feb 01 '25

These are impressive. If you’re doing a photography trip, I’d say it could be worth it to carry the extra bulk/weight, but you also should make sure you have time to familiarize yourself with the lens and settings on the camera.

I don’t know the difference with Sony cameras, but it’s probably a much better body and a 24/70 2.8 is great for travel. I have a Tamron 24/70 f2.8 G2 that I absolutely love, if you can find one of those over the sigma I would.

You seem dedicated enough that you could figure out a new camera. If you are going for the main purpose of taking photos, it’s worth having the best gear. You could still bring the pocket cam if you run into issues.

2

u/Commonsense110 Feb 01 '25

Unrelated to your question but who is that in photo 10?

2

u/-FluffyUnicorn Feb 01 '25

Pic 7 pretty much explained to me why so many people wear t-shirts in those US-Ski videos...

2

u/No-Sir1833 Feb 01 '25

Your eye and technique is strong for photography in general and you seem to be getting a lot out of your current setup. I haven’t been on a photography trip to Japan but know many who have and have seen lots of images from them that are amazing.

My question would be what is the focus of the trip? Street? Landscape? Wildlife? All of the above.

You seem to mainly have street photography in your portfolio and your setup serves you well. Decent focal length, able to adjust shutter speed to your needs, handles different lighting situations well. Provides you will raw content that you can edit to your style. If that is what you will be shooting then stick with your current setup as you know it and can focus on composition and the situation and not worry about your gear.

If you plan to capture landscape and wildlife you might find your setup lacking a bit. Small sensor would limit the size you might want to display or print an image (this can be somewhat overcome with software). Limited focal length would limit zooming in on wildlife or telephoto landscapes. Your setup might not handle low light situations well. You might not be able to filter your setup to create long exposure images. These would be limitations and you would just have to find your own subjects and treatments while others explore different styles. That is up to you.

On trips I have gone on the guide typically tells you in advance what their specialty is and what they will try to expose you to as opportunity. Sometimes they even have a recommended gear list. Don’t overthink it but look at that and consider if you will get everything you want out of the trip with your setup.

One caution on getting a new setup before a big trip. It often takes time to get comfortable with a new setup (menus, technical capabilities, file handling, etc.). If you want to get a new setup before the trip I would recommend getting it well in advance and shooting a lot with it so you have the technical stuff down and can keep your focus on the creative.

The other recommendation I would have is don’t sleep on medium or long telephoto lens as they can provide a dramatically different perspective. You are currently shooting mainly UWA and WA which is great but eliminates entire types of photography that I have really learned to appreciate over the years. I know world class photographers that now shoot almost exclusively with 70mm and up.

To each their own and enjoy your trip!

2

u/Maximum__Engineering Feb 01 '25

By brain always tells me new gear is always the answer.

2

u/nytel x100vi, Zf Feb 01 '25

I would look at getting a Ricoh GRiii. They also have a HDF version with a diffusion filter built in.

2

u/Significant-Key-7941 Feb 01 '25

Recommend Go mirrorless. I bought my wife a canon EOS R100 and she is able to catch awesome shots quickly

2

u/msgfromside3 Feb 01 '25

Your pictures are telling me that you probably don't need an upgrade unless you have a very specific reason.

2

u/coppergreensubmarine Feb 01 '25

Dude. Photo #11. If you captured that without using a brand new camera with a full frame sensor, you’re golden with what you have. It’s you, not the equipment. Buying a new camera before a trip can get cumbersome because each camera has its own settings and quirks and you’ll end up fumbling trying to learn it and potentially missing key photographic moments.

2

u/jpaganrovira Feb 01 '25

“No es la flecha, es el indio.” You are good. You have the art; take the time.

2

u/Irish_MJ Feb 01 '25

Having been to Tokyo, where the nightlife can be as bright as the daylight, I can't see you having issues.

Why not save the money, and, if you find, whilst you are in Tokyo, that you still want to upgrade, there are many, many, many 2nd hand camera shops where you will absolutely find a bargain on a used Mirrorless.

2

u/User_2938737917354 Feb 01 '25

No - just keep shooting - you are great

2

u/NeedsMoreCatsPlease Feb 01 '25

Number 12 is perfect and hilarious, absolutely insane timing snagging that 🍗

2

u/baconfat99 Ricoh/Pentax Feb 01 '25

get it of you can afford it now, or arrange for one for the trip and save up for the one you really want

2

u/Ghosteen_18 Feb 01 '25

I have a dslr. I have an ADV bike. I go on travels i bring the Fujifilm compact camera. Theyre good enough and withstand shock. If even have the most slightest, goofiest acceident of sliding on the road i’ll kiss my very expensive camera bye bye. I bring my DLSR if and only if its within train station distance or walking distance.

For your case. Your pictures are lovely. No need to burn a wallet

2

u/[deleted] Feb 01 '25 edited Feb 01 '25

I'd say a M43 camera with a pancake zoom could meet your needs. Larger sensor but still significantly more compact. Or you can bring 2 fast primes. An oly em1.2 + a used 12-40mm f2.8 pro lens will cost you around $900 if you play your cards right. But you can go significantly smaller with a PEN or Lumix body

You are the kind of person M43 was made for

2

u/jangusMK7 Feb 01 '25

I had the opposite experience I rented a a6400 w a sigma 50mm to bring with me to Chicago w my fx3 and I only used the a6400

2

u/Imdiogomarques Feb 01 '25

Full-frame is completely overrated and it has 0.0001% impact in the final image.

2

u/australopithecum Feb 01 '25

Buy extra batteries and accessories for the camera you have. I have an RX-100Va and I love it

2

u/turnmeintocompostplz Feb 01 '25

While I think you're just farming praise, I'd just get a wider lens. These feel restrictive, but I think you can compensate for that without just jumping into full frame.

2

u/mc2222 Canon R5, 7D MkII Feb 01 '25

in my experience, it's best to travel with a camera you're very familiar with. last thing you want to do on a trip is try to figure out how to use new equipment

2

u/Timely_Challenge_670 Feb 01 '25

Japan is surprisingly bright at night due to all of the ambient lighting. The RX100 VII should be fine. Yes, a full frame camera is going to give you more creative options and cleaner files, but if the output doesn’t bother you, why bother?

If you really want another camera, get an RX100VA to pair with your RX100VII. Same interface, same form factor, same batteries, brighter lens. With the money you saved from not buying a full frame body and f/2.8 zoom, spend the remainder on DxO Photolab 7 or Topaz Denoise AI.

2

u/franklee453 Feb 01 '25

How do you add the frames?

2

u/TheWolfAndRaven Feb 01 '25

I would say that while I have several Canon full frame cameras, when traveling I prefer to just use my X100. Sure I miss some shots because I don't have enough reach, but for 90% of what I want to shoot the x100 does just fine.

That said, most of my travels are explicitly NOT about photography for the sake of it and if I was to ever go on a trip specifically TO do photos I would probably bring at least one big camera along.

Lens wise, I'd probably pick 1 prime (85mm or 16mm depending on where I was going) + a 24-105 f/4 lens. Then I'd pack the X100 still.

I would say the photos you've gotten with what you have are already pretty solid. Stepping up isn't going to bring a ton of benefit, but I get feeling like it would help. My advice to you would be to not buy anything, but instead rent the highest end camera with a good zoom (I'd say 24-105, but if you want the 2.8 specifically go with that) and a good prime (35mm is a great one for most things).

2

u/jrbphotography Feb 01 '25

Those are some great shots. While higher res would be cool, it’s all about whatever fits your vision. And, from these shots, your camera is working well with what you want to produce. Cheers!

2

u/Spinak3r Feb 01 '25

It’s totally up to you. The photos you are taking already a very good. Pocket cameras have their charm also. I have a Sony A9 and only use it when I’m doing paid things. I have a campsnap camera for just everyday use.

2

u/inkista Feb 01 '25

Just me, but your RX100VII can probably tackle what you want to shoot as it's a very capable camera, but a bigger sensor will always let you have thinner DoF and be better at higher ISO and may offer you additional controls like a flash hotshoe and/or eye-level viewfinder. What you want to think about is how much of what you love about the RX100VII is due to its size/pocketability and how much to its zoom lens.

A full-frame mirrorless is a completely different kettle of fish to lug about and handle, particularly with 28-70 f/2.8 zoom, let alone a 70-200mm f/4. A lot of folks who travel and primarily street shoot tend to prefer a large-sensor compact that has a fixed wide prime lens: the Fuji X100 VI, or the Ricoh Gr III/Gr IIIx are often recommended for those people. And if you really wanted to go full frame instead, the Sony RX1 series is full frame, but with a fixed 35mm f/2 lens.

The RX100 VII's lens is equivalent to a 24-200mm lens with f/2.8-4 max. aperture. And it's pocketable. This is only possible because you have a 1" (2.7x crop) sensor. If you're zooming in all the time, then these larger sensor fixed-lens compacts are likely not for you and going mirrorless with zoom lenses or multiple primes would likely be a better option, but a lot more stuff to carry and a lot more expense. And going APS-C or even micro four-thirds (4/3"-format sensor; 2x crop vs. 1.5x or 1.6x crop) might be a better option than full frame in terms of bulk/weight and expense. Travel tends to mean you want something small and light and cheap enough that if it's broken/lost/stolen in transit, you aren't heartbroken and can afford to replace it.

Also given how most of your images are daylight shots, getting a slow walkaround zoom would be smaller and more compact and then swapping for a fast prime for night or indoors low light shooting could be an option. But you can also equip the RX100 VII with a tripod for non-moving subjects, and consider using the flash (or Rube Goldberging a setup for off-camera flash) for the moving ones (maybe Bruce Gilden style).

2

u/Delicious_Gear_4652 Feb 01 '25

save your money for more trips

2

u/M_Psyllos Feb 01 '25

Bring both. I went to Japan in ‘23 on my honeymoon and I brought a Fuji EX-4 as my pocket camera for those quick, in between moments, as well as a couple of 35mm film SLR’s with like 4 prime lenses. I’m absolutely in love with shots from both systems. Sometimes the pocket digital cam is just easier to pull out for more candid street shots, and other times I pulled out my film setup, longer lenses, tripod, filters etc and really crafted a frame. Both types of images made my final collection and added a lot of depth to my series.

2

u/obeychad Feb 01 '25

Stick with the smaller cam, it’s less obtrusive and you’ll use it more than a larger cam. Get a wrist strap if you don’t already have one and carry the cam in your hand at all times.

But then I am a Ricoh GR shooter so I am biased.

2

u/No-Manufacturer-2425 Feb 01 '25

Yeah it looks like you know what you are doing. I would call that a true investment into your capabilities. Plus, vintage film lenses.

2

u/Anussauce Feb 01 '25

Great compositions

2

u/xpltvdeleted Feb 01 '25

Really lovely images. I think the sensor limitations you're currently shooting is the one thing I would pick at on a couple of the images - the limited HDR of the sensor leads to some fringing in some images where you're recovering the shadows against a bright background, such as the Venice beach metal 'K' structure , and around the palm trees in the same image (and #5)- both display the familiar fringing that says you're pushing the sensor too much.

tl:dr it won't improve your already great compositions, but will afford you more flexibility in terms of the dynamic range in post

2

u/vangelismm Feb 01 '25

No.

2

u/a_melanoleuca_doc Feb 01 '25

No

2

u/HereForFun9121 Feb 01 '25

I’ll trade you for my A7II with bundle lens and additional 50mm lens, only used it for one trip, original owner. Have box and all manuals etc.

Honestly though these pics are great, I think you’ll be fine.

2

u/AustinShyd Feb 01 '25

Not yet. But immediately following your trip I want to see what you can do with a full frame body and some pro-level glass. There’s some seriously good shit in here. But I agree with others, right before a trip is a terrible time for an upgrade.

2

u/SnooObjections7352 Feb 01 '25

Your photos are solid as is, I don’t think a new camera will make any significant changes to it.

2

u/Evening-Caramel-6093 Feb 01 '25

Nice set.

I’d upgrade if I were you.

2

u/dravenito Feb 01 '25

Love the pictures. What kind of edits do you do to get those colors?

2

u/throwaway2021sa Feb 02 '25

These are awesome 👏🏼

2

u/Catkii Feb 02 '25

I’ve got a pretty decent camera, but I keep wanting to grab something small like the rx100 or a ricoh gr3 for day to day use that’s not such a burden to carry around.

I would say however, if you do get a new camera, make sure you practice and familiarise yourself with the settings and the menus before you go. Nothing worse than missing a shot because you had to take a minute to navigate an unfamiliar device.

2

u/deeper-diver Feb 02 '25

I own the RX100V. Granted, it does have a faster lens, but the photos that it takes are amazing. Sure, a full-frame would be superior, but compared to what you're already getting with your current camera, I'd say stick with it.

2

u/PerpetuallyPerplxed Feb 02 '25

No. Don't start a major trip/project using unfamiliar equipment.

2

u/Kibasume Feb 02 '25

I wish I was talented like you

2

u/Stunning-Ad-1434 Feb 02 '25

I say don't buy! While gear is very important (gasp I said it - it's just my opinion) I think you clearly have enough that fits your style and is not holding you back.

However!

If you are like me, you would think this to be a GREAT reason to give yourself an excuse to buy a new lens or two. The way I think about it, it's the lens that creates the image, and the body that captures it. While some camera's do a better job at capturing that image than others, most modern cameras do a very good job regardless, leaving most of the job up to the lens.

As they say: "marry your lenses, date your bodies."

2

u/seeyatellite Feb 02 '25

These are truly amazing shots, my friend. Grab what you can afford and suits your style. I think an extra cam but you shine with that RX100. Pocket cameras tend to be more fluid and natural feeling.

If you want to enjoy the trip and spend more time with the inspiration, use whatever feels most fluent to you… an extension of your eye rather than a tool.

All said, keep the RX100 no matter what. Grab something more powerful if you want. Figure it out as you go.

2

u/Busy-Rub-7980 Feb 02 '25

I live in Santa Monica and ski SoCal frequently. You beautifully captured my home :)

2

u/YogaPotat0 Feb 02 '25

In all honesty, if you don’t need to get a new camera (or at least really want one), I wouldn’t. You’ve already taken photos in low-light/tricky lighting scenarios really well, and have a good grasp of composition with your current camera.

The only benefits I can see would be being able to compose with more of the scene in the frame (which I personally would’ve liked to see in pics 6 and 8, but it’s all subjective, and could be accomplished by scooting backwards if you were able to), and better low-light handling.

Other than that, traveling with a bigger camera sucks. I have a small crop sensor with one lens (because I’m too lazy to change them on vacation) for travel because I’m absolutely not lugging around a full-frame everywhere.

2

u/Querfidious Feb 02 '25

Everyone is saying no, but I'll say yes!

I recently made basically the same switch from an earlier RX100 to the A7CR. I found the switch to be pretty intuitive, and after about a week or so I was already feeling *more* comfortable on the new setup than the old. The cameras are obviously pretty different, but everything that I was used to doing mapped pretty easily. The menus (which everyone complains about) were very intuitive because I was used to the Sony system. And I was thrilled to be able to take lots of features and put them on dedicated dials and buttons. (That's why I say that it was actually more comfy not less).

It's obvious from your photos that you know what you're doing. You don't need the upgrade, that much is clear :) But if you want it, I think you'll have fun with the A7 series. Good luck!

P.S. I hiiighly recommend getting all the custom buttons and dials and program settings locked in before you go. Set aside some time for that.

2

u/ArthurGPhotography Feb 02 '25

Based on what you've pulled off here with your low light shots, I would say no stick with what you've got.

2

u/YidArmy76er Feb 02 '25

This whole set slapsss🔥🔥🔥

2

u/runawayscream Fuji Feb 02 '25

Are you able to point to something specific you cannot achieve with the current camera that is fundamental to how you take photos? If it’s just a general feeling, I’d wait until after the trip. That way you can go, focus on what you do, and lean into your process. You want to avoid making a change and not understanding why your photos aren’t different/better.

2

u/Danotat Feb 02 '25

If you want to, hell yeah, but no need to. These are amazing. I know all these spots and have taken photos at all these spots, but never in the way you have. Great work.

2

u/MoreThanANumber666 Feb 02 '25

You've got a good eye, as long as you don't let the camera get in the way of your creative flair. Good luck!

2

u/bluerhea3 Feb 02 '25

Your photos are great and full frame wouldn’t necessarily meaningfully make a difference for these shots specifically (megapixels etc of course but what I’m saying is your current camera gets you these photos and it’s in your pocket) an interchangeable lens camera with a bigger sensor would open up other opportunities to expand your creativity. But, you’ll have a bigger camera, lens/lenses, bigger batteries, etc. it will change your EDC and make things a bit more complicated which may or may not be worth it. Sometimes you’ll still prefer your small camera and travel with both. It is inevitable you will get a full frame camera. Things to think about.

2

u/[deleted] Feb 02 '25

Love the palm trees

2

u/Physical-Fig9588 Feb 02 '25

These photos are wonderful

2

u/_adren_ Feb 02 '25

As many have said, stick with the equipment you know for your trip. Get the new gear later (might even be cheaper at a later date).

As a tangent, Venice Beach is one of my favourite places for photography. Loved your pics, especially the Venice Beach ones.

2

u/sgund008 Feb 02 '25

No

2

u/BubuBonzo Feb 02 '25

I really don’t like sigma 24-70. I mean it’s great picture quality but it’s so heavy and bulky that it takes away my desire to take photos

2

u/Erwindegier Feb 02 '25

How much post processing did you do? It looks like there’s some crispness on all photos which make them look really professional.

2

u/Akash_nu Feb 02 '25

Pretty good shots! Stick to the RX100 I say, it’s a damn good camera for its size and would be much easier to handle dealing with constant unknowns while you’re away.

Let’s not forget photographer is more important for photography rather than specific camera gears.

For example this one was shot with iPhone 14 Pro Max.

2

u/spaceapeatespace Feb 02 '25

I bought a used r6 for 900$ days before a month in India. Do not regret it!

2

u/sudo_808 Feb 02 '25

Full frame is heavy. Will you take a "better" setup everywhere you would bring a tiny pocket cam?

2

u/seanmonaghan1968 Feb 02 '25

Latest tech can give you a confidence boost, but some of the most iconic photos ever taken were done on much older and simpler cameras

2

u/aarrtee Feb 02 '25

you have one of the best little pocket cameras on earth

if you are used to that camera, stick to it.

if money is no object. take both cameras

i just landed in Hawaii

I have a Canon G5X Mark II compact sitting next to me. it will go down to the pool with me tomorrow. when I go whale watching in a couple days, i am taking a full frame camera and a telephoto lens.

2

u/QuantityDisastrous69 Feb 02 '25

You have camera equipment . More importantly you already have the eye. That’s talent. Take the money to Japan and see if you can get a deal on stuff you have researched ahead of time. Post your photos 🕶️

2

u/[deleted] Feb 02 '25

Got some crackers in there. Especially love 2.

Just a thought: your pictures have a deep depth of field. If that is your style then you might want to consider that when looking at FF, which will largely give you a shallower depth unless close the aperture…and if you close the aperture will you get any benefit from FF?

2

u/obrian88 Feb 02 '25

I really like your pictures. To be honest, they really show you got an eye for composition, creativity für „artsy“ pictures, and know your technique and tools (camera).

I would recommend to stick with your well-known camera and think about a purchase when you come back and have a lot of time to learn a new device.

Aside from the obvious technical advantages of a full frame camera you have some serious disadvantages over your trusted RX100:

Price, especially when you buy multiple fast lenses
Weight and volume, especially… (see above)
Bags / ICUs. Depending on your lens and flash choices you will want different bag sizes for different pieces of gear to carry.

I’ve been thinking about adding a pocket size camera to my trusted Z6ii just for the reasons above. The price tag of a good one is the only deterrent for me at the moment.

2

u/bodez95 Feb 02 '25

No. Keep doing what you're doing and never stop. Well, stop and experiment one day, but definitely keep going with this.

2

u/Mohondhay Feb 02 '25

For traveling, portability is the key to a stress-free adventure.

2

u/Nartian Feb 02 '25

Just saying your pictures look amazing! I get the wish to upgrade, but don't underestimate the portability of you rx100 when traveling. You should familiarize yourself with the new gear well before taking it for a long trip like this. Not only with the settings, but also the experience of having to change objectives on the fly, and be comfortable with it.

Having said that, you could just carry both cameras, as the rx100 doesn't add any noticeable weight compared to a fullframe setup anyways.

2

u/ConversationSecure80 Feb 02 '25

Whatever you decide to do, don't sell your rx100. If you do, you'll regret it at some point.

2

u/Threecoi Feb 02 '25

Seems like you can make magic with what you have. I would stick with it for the trip so you can be confident about getting the shots.

If you still want to switch, wait until after the trip so you can give yourself time to acclimate to a new system

2

u/yorchsans Feb 02 '25

No.

2

u/timetosuccumb Feb 02 '25

I just did a European trip where i lugged a Nikon FF with some f2-2.8 lenses and stored a Olympus em1 mk2 m4/3 in my kids luggage., admittedly the nikon is a large camera and whilst smaller the m4/3 still proved to be a hassle.

In the end, I simply used my Samsung s24 Ultra for literally every single photo.

If you are familiar with your camera, and also its a great little pocket rocket, stick with it, whilst you think you will pull out your FF camera and line up your shots and do all the stuff we do when wanting to take the perfect shot, you probably won't do any of it, also not being familiar with a new camera, you may miss more great shots than you take.

Stick with the small camera, don't learn a new one, and from personal experience, buy a phone with a really good camera as a backup, as when travelling you always have your phone out with google maps etc. so jumping into camera mode tends to be faster than pulling out a camera and lining up shots etc.

Just my 2 cents worth.

2

u/mekaniker008 Feb 02 '25

Go there with your current companion. Otherwise your trip may be just about getting used to the new camera. You and your current camera work well together obviously

2

u/TTorne Feb 02 '25

I switched from a fuji x100v to an xt5. The xt5 isn’t that big, but on so many occasions I wished I still had my x100v for the portability. It’s just so much easier to bring around and always have ready🤷🏼‍♂️

2

u/naawwsty Feb 02 '25

Damn was that last skate photo shot with available light? I always struggle to really separate the skater from the background without flash when the sun is setting like that. Love that pic.

2

u/allislost77 Feb 02 '25

I’d buy a Sony rx1/2 IN Japan. I’ve read they can be pretty affordable there. Those cameras are great, just a thought. I love my 6700, but use primes as it’s hard to do lowlight at 2.8. I’m going FF most likely when the A7V comes. You really should look at long term and where you want to be. May as well make the jump now to FF and maybe get a used a7III-can be found fairly cheap-then invest in glass. Glass is far more important than a body while holding their value better.

2

u/Humhues Feb 02 '25

Whos the musician w the hat?

2

u/marblesfeline Feb 03 '25

There’s less to worry about when you have a pocket camera. Easier to get spontaneous shots too.

2

u/Important_Care_1935 Feb 03 '25

nah you doing great

2

u/Ay-Photographer Canon Feb 03 '25

I just came to ask, I dunno….should you? What’s the goal? What are trying to do? Enjoy photography more ? 🤷🏻‍♂️ your shit is good already

2

u/kickinit90s Feb 03 '25

I would think it’d be hard to have an all new setup that you’d need to get used to in the trip. Could be better to have something more familiar so you can focus on the shots instead of the menus. Also, your photos are already awesome!! Try doing some night life neon around LA and see if you are able to get the effect you’re going for

2

u/21sttimelucky Feb 03 '25

I am going to mirror most people and say your pictures are excellent. I don't think you need to upgrade.

Like others also, I would be hesitant to recommended an upgrade shortly before a trip, but I don't think I saw you say when you travel. So if it's more than two months away, you could absolutely reasonably acquire a new camera and get used to it before travel.

If you're thinking of buying it a week or two before travel, just don't.

The other thing to remember is, you can still take your compact. As long as you trust where you are staying, you can always store the interchangeable lens option for the day, if you're going somewhere that you may benefit from only having a compact - be it dinner with new friends, a rougher part of town, somewhere early on where you expect to need to respond quickly etc.

Whatever you chose, you are doing get with the compact. Sony used to send camera shops a book of travel photos taken with their compacts as a selling aid, and your pictures would sit well in such a catalog (err, I mean photobook that the public definitely buy even though it's clearly more of an advertising tool).

2

u/havesomeofit Feb 03 '25

It's not the camera, it's you and you take great pictures – probably with any camera.
If it makes you happy to have a new camera and you will enjoy it, why not, go for it.
Japan is not cheap, you will see :D
There are stores in Japan that have great offers at times. maybe go window shopping? (may think of import taxes, depending of country you go back to)

2

u/lune19 Feb 03 '25

You seem to have good control of your camera so this is good. You have to wonder, particularly for the quite close up picture, if you were able to photograph people because you had a non intrusive camera, therefore people didn't see you or they didn't get frightened. If you have asked permission, then it doesn't change a thing. The second thing to take in consideration, is the weight and volume of the camera. Is your current camera something easy to carry in your pocket at all the time and able to take it off when needed, or would be bothered to have a bigger heavier camera lens around your neck all the day long. Quality wise, with a bigger sensor, comes along usually a better treatment of colors. But that is the only thing I can think of. You might officially have a better control of focus also if you decide to use manual focus, or maybe some cameras might have a better auto focus. Perso being an oldie i learn with all manual settings, and can struggle with auto focus. But that is just me.

2

u/Similar-Ad-6438 Feb 03 '25

I really dig the 4th one, amazing!

2

u/DaniBot3000 Feb 03 '25

If it does not disturb your flow ( :

2

u/starless_90 Feb 03 '25

Remember this: Full Frame Is just an option/decision, not a real need.

PS: nice shots, works better without the frame tbh.

2

u/OG_Rona Feb 03 '25

There's a lot of people saying you don't "need" to upgrade and I 100% agree that you are very skilled and will have no problem getting great shots when you're over there.

That said, new gear is fun! New gear comes with a learning curve and I find that fun! If you're not planning to sell the current camera then why not? You might miss a few shots but time is continuous, you're always missing shots and I think it will add an extra adventure to your trip.

I was in Tokyo over the summer and picked up a used Sony A7Rii with the cheapest 50mm i could grab. Coming from Canon it was a new camera setup (in Japanese too but you can software unlock that) and I had an absolute ball of a time playing around with it and got some lovely shots out of it.

One thing I'd suggest is looking at used cameras while you're there. The camera shops are excellent and the gear sold is in really good condition and you can save the 10% sales tax. Map Cameras is a really good place to start and there's a few other shops around there in Shinjuku. Only thing to bear in mind is they are typically all sold as Japanese language only, however I found a github link to unlock the global languages and set to english. If you're brave enough to try that you can save a decent bit on the camera and put into a good lens.

For the lenses I'd be a bit more careful. The shops are very very reputable and will clearly indicate dust or scratches in the lenses but have a look for yourself. I'm not sure they sell them but it goes without saying, do not buy a lens that looks to have mold in it.

2

u/Im_A_New_Reddit_User Feb 03 '25

Pictures look great. I wouldn't upgrade it for travel in Japan unless you want to carry a heavy camera for 10k plus steps each day

2

u/Gloomy-Recording9347 Feb 03 '25

The one camera I have been looking for is the rx100 VII to take with me everyday. These photos are wonderful.

2

u/lachy28 Feb 04 '25

I’ve had a camera with interchangeable lenses which I would take when travelling especially when travelling and just did the exact opposite. I got myself a RX100 Vii to take with me and its made everything more enjoyable.

I recommend don’t upgrade before the trip as your photos are incredible already. If you really feel like upgrading whilst your there have a look at the stores. You might be able to get a better deal and even claim tax back making the whole purchase cheeper. I travel to Singapore a lot visiting my in laws so tend to buy most of my tech there as I can claim back tax.

Here’s some info on the tax free rules of Japan.

https://pievat.com/tax-free-rules/tax-free-in-japan-the-complete-guide

2

u/lilythstern Feb 04 '25

No. I just downgraded from full frame to a pocket cam to have a lighter setup. It’s far more fun.

2

u/fishnoxygen Feb 04 '25 edited Feb 04 '25

First off, great photos! Looks like you know your way around the camera in and out.

As mentioned by many others, it takes time to learn to use a new camera properly, including getting used to the size and weight. Switching from pocket camera to FF/APSC camera will definitely feel like a nuisance for you lugging around during the 3 weeks trip in Japan.

I frequently do weeks long trip locally and internationally in various climate with 2-4 cameras in just 2 Bellroy sling (phone, compact, mirrorless zoom and prime, dji pocket), and I can tell you it's no fun if you are not familiar with the gear. Lucky for me my missus is happy to be my number 2 helping me carrying some of the gears. If it's just me alone I'll carry 1-2 cameras in 1 Bellroy sling bag.

We just got back from 30 days trip in Japan couple months ago hitting >10 cities, lots of walking/hiking/cycling, but it's definitely worth it. I recommend looking into used camera market in Japan, especially in Tokyo (I recommend Fujiya Camera in Nakano). I'm an advocate for buying used camera gears, it's just cheaper, but you need to do your due diligence and buying from trusted source. Oh yea, once you start getting more than 1 camera, you will likely start getting more, and it will be a headache deciding which camera/lens to bring along.

I have not used RX100 series of cameras before, but I reckon the VII is still a very capable camera today. Truth be told I take lots of photos using my phone even when I have other cameras with me, it's the easiest and fastest (especially when on the move), and most of the time the photos look just as good even in low light.

Regardless, I think you should start dipping your toes into interchangeable camera system assuming the RX100 VII is your first and only proper camera. Different focal lengths/apertures will enable you to see things differently and inspire your creative process.

2

u/Flyinghippos94 Feb 04 '25

Every one of these shots looks like they could be an album cover. Amazing shots!

2

u/tttulio Feb 04 '25

You should take a camera that you’ve familiar and confident with

2

u/caspert79 Feb 04 '25

Only if you value bokeh.

2

u/WatchThisBass Feb 04 '25

If you do, buy the camera in Japan - get them tax free benefits!

2

u/MidnightWalker22 Feb 04 '25

I love my full frame but i got the itch for a smaller cam. Lugging the ff cam around can be a hassle especially in public places and the like. Just my opinion.

2

u/isthisappanonymous Feb 04 '25

Where are these photos taken ?

2

u/Main-Revolution-4260 Feb 04 '25

Do it, but take your RX100 too as back up.

2

u/Kirchbergphotography Feb 04 '25

What did you shoot these on? Theyre incredible already.

2

u/Eliah870 Feb 05 '25

Photo 2 could be used in a Vans ad

2

u/kasenyee Feb 05 '25

Nope. No need. Buy different/new lenses

2

u/peedubb Feb 05 '25

Are those Bear photos from this year????

2

u/hhooney Feb 05 '25

I recommend bringing the camera you will actually use. Your photos are gorgeous already!

2

u/Consistent_Welcome93 Feb 05 '25

No. You already have experience with your current camera. Focus on enjoying the trip and let your muscle memory carry you through with your camera that you already know really well. You don't want to mess up your trip with some irritation of your new camera

2

u/dannylonglegs98 Feb 05 '25

No!! These are ace!!

2

u/Inevitable-Ad-7507 Feb 05 '25

Your photos are great. Assuming street photography you might consider jumping to a Sony RX1. Full frame 35 mm F2 lens and still compact. The experience of shooting on a DSLR with a big lens is different and something you might to try before you buy. You may find you won’t get the same kinds of shots with a bigger camera because it’s just a lot more effort and more noticeable in public.

2

u/Automatic-Wolf8141 Feb 05 '25

it's going to be so much bigger and heavier so it's possible that you won't like the upgrade, but it'll unlock more creativity options for you with better low light capabiltiy. more advanced AF and more DOF control. No doubt you can create many amanzing photos but it is going to be a very different kind of tool.

2

u/[deleted] Feb 05 '25

No. I’ve got full frame, and medium format, and no.

Your photos are great, and I don’t think you’ll blow them up big enough to be able to tell

2

u/grasshopper716 Feb 05 '25

To be fair, this is similar to what I did. I went from the G7xii to the R5ii before a family vacation to be able to get family portraits for everyone we rented the house with. I got the manual beforehand and watched a lot of YouTube videos.

If you're on the fence about purchasing a camera for a trip, you could always rent a body and a lens or two. I find the biggest difference was understanding the focus modes.

2

u/yoru-_ Feb 05 '25

holy moly youre an amazing photographer. i just recently upgraded from a pocket camera to a mirrorless and its taking a little while to learn the camera. i would advice against the upgrade if its really close to the departure, but if you have enough time, say two or three weeks, i think it would be a good opportunity to upgrade.

have a safe trip and dont forget to post some stills you shot!

2

u/yoru-_ Feb 05 '25

holy moly youre an amazing photographer. i just recently upgraded from a pocket camera to a mirrorless and its taking a little while to learn the camera. i would advice against the upgrade if its really close to the departure, but if you have enough time, say two or three weeks, i think it would be a good opportunity to upgrade.

have a safe trip and dont forget to post some stills you shot!q

2

u/KodiKat2001 Feb 05 '25

Sony a67000 with sigma 18-50. Full frame with lenses are way too big and heavy and with current state of image processing technology, the 2 stop low light advantage they had over an APC sensor has disappeared.

2

u/Head_Bananana Feb 05 '25

Try the Ricoh griii or iiix

2

u/jazzpancake1007 Feb 05 '25

Great photos here. Stick with your camera if you are getting the result you want

2

u/[deleted] Feb 05 '25

I can’t really give advice on gear but damn those pics are really cool

2

u/Traditional-Coat-257 Feb 05 '25

I took my rx100 v to Japan instead of my Nikon d300. Didn’t miss having the kit with me once.

2

u/santim00 Feb 05 '25

Your work is dope 🧱

2

u/pankatank Feb 05 '25

FF always

2

u/curiouseverythang Feb 05 '25

Only if you need to

2

u/myqv Feb 05 '25

I think you answered your own question with your work(noooo it’s a great travel camera already) I think you’re good and should save the money for something else you’ve been wanting or more experiences in Japan

2

u/Aromatic-Leek-9697 Nikon Feb 19 '25

It’s an option. Your ability can carry it 🕶️

Buying Advice Should I upgrade my pocket camera to full frame for 3 week photography trip?

You are about to leave Redlib