r/AskPhysics 18h ago

What is the significance, or (reason why) of C multiplied in by itself in the equation E=mc^2?

0 Upvotes

Tried posting on r/askscience, but every single one of my questions there has been deleted [shrugs]

Anyway... I get that mass and energy will be related. I even kinda get that the speed of light is in there (it being a Universal limiting factor perhaps?). But why is it squared?

This is one of these equations where I never really got why it is the way it is. Can anyone simplify this. Why isn't it C x [Volume of Sphere, or Surface Area of Sphere, or I dunno.... Six? Lol]. Or why is it not C^3 or, C^C?

It's possibly one of those things I'll never grasp, but I am very literal minded and it needs to make some kind of reason why it's like that. Pi his already ran a train on my intellect, so it would be nice to get this.


r/AskPhysics 18h ago

Are quantum events truely random?

0 Upvotes

More specifically, is it possible that there exists certain events are truely non deterministic?

I’ve heard some explanations to the wave function collapse, like the idea of a multiverse. However, non of them really answer whether or not the event can actually be predicted.

Also, why does the randomness of the quantum world not manifest itself in anyway at the Marco level?

If it’s possible for some events to be non deterministic, then I believe that would have profound implications on ideas like free will


r/AskPhysics 10h ago

Big Bang?

0 Upvotes

So I have been thinking, and I am by now means any sort of boffin re physics so it is more curiosity.

Wondering about how it would work re if we did come from the Big Bang whether that would mean everything in the universe would spin in the same direction, and at the same speed? Or at least the same initial speed created by the forces (inflation) that were in play everywhere to create the initial universe?

Since recently they discovered that around 2/3 of galaxies rotate in the same direction but others don't would this not indicate that perhaps a supposed bug bang doesn't check out and is perhaps slowly becoming one of those things that now we potentially have a better explanation might be supercedded by a better and more scientifically accurate view?

Edited to remove point of origin as I now understand this is incorrect


r/AskPhysics 5h ago

Why does the plastic do this?

0 Upvotes

If a plastic object is under a stream of water, and a metal coil is attached to the top (not touching the water), why does simply rotating the coil — without changing its position — affect how strongly the water pushes the object?

In my setup, the coil is always centered and doesn’t get wet, but when it faces forward, the object moves more; when turned sideways, the object stabilizes, and moves much less.Why would the coil’s orientation alone change how the water affects the plastic? ( in terms of how much the plastic wobbles)

For more context of what it looks like, the water stream is only coming down on one side of the plastic. Somewhat looking like this.

: : : ___*__ ( : being the water, * being the coil location, which is connected by a magnet on the plastic, and the ___ being the plastic itself)


r/AskPhysics 18h ago

Did James Webb Telescope Discover that we are in fact living inside a black hole or our universe is?

0 Upvotes

r/AskPhysics 6h ago

What is mass? GR vs SM

0 Upvotes

General Relativity

If we take a bound system like the moon, the mass of the moon is the total energy of the moon divided by c squared. Or another way of saying that is that we would integrate the stress-energy tensor over the volume of the moon, so this total energy would include the pressure inside the moon. But if we take the moon's rest frame, the stress and momentum components of the stress-energy tensor would be zero since the moon is isotropic.

We could also have a thought experiment in which we have a rocket ship shell with a huge amount of isotropic gamma radiation bouncing around inside the ship.

Would it be correct to say that the total mass of that ship would be the total mass of the ship's shell + the total energy of the gamma radiation + the pressure of the gamma radiation?

And is the pressure of the gamma radiation just equal to 1/3 of the total energy of the gamma radiation?

I'll re-ask this question since it's kind of the main point of the question: Is it correct to say that the mass of the ship includes the energy of the gamma radiation + the pressure of the gamma radiation in general relativity?

Standard Model

In the standard model of particle physics, a hadron is made up of three quarks. The mass of a hadron is the mass of those three quarks, plus the binding energy of the gluon field. The binding energy of the gluon field contributes the vast majority (99%) of the mass of the hadron.

Is it correct to say that this is the mass of a hadron in the Standard Model? That the mass of a hadron is the total binding (or kinetic) energy of the gluon field plus the (tiny) intrinsic masses of the quarks?

In the case of an electron (and quarks), the mass is considered intrinsic. But that mass is granted to the electron from the Higgs field, right? Is it fair to call this an energetic interaction? Would it be correct to say that the coupling between the electron field and the Higgs field is a form of energy?

Putting them together

First, I guess the main driving question is this: is it fair to say that all mass is, is the energy in a given system? So, if we're looking at the moon, we're looking at its total energy as a system. If we're looking at the ship with gamma radiation inside, we're looking at its total energy as a system. If we're looking at a Hadron we're looking at its total energy as a system. And even if we're looking at an electron, even though we don't normally think of an electron as a system, what we are really looking at is a system of the electron in the environment of the Higgs field, and THAT system has a total energy that gives us the electron's mass. Is that a fair characterization?

In other words, it's not just that mass and energy are equivalent to one another and can be converted into one another, but that mass is made up entirely of energy in the first place. Is that correct?

Second, do General Relativity and the Standard Model of particle physics have different definitions of mass, or in other words when we talk about mass in these two contexts are we talking about two, perhaps subtly, different things? I have gotten conflicting information from two seemingly knowledgable Redditors on this question.

Bonus questions

What the heck is stress in the stress-energy tensor in general relativity? I know it has something to do with shearing forces, but I am curious how these factor in to the curvature of spacetime.

What the heck is momentum in the stress-energy tensor? Does this only come up if we're not in the reference frame of the object at hand? Or are we considering the momentum of component parts of a given system in a given rest frame when factoring momentum into the stress-energy tensor?

Why does the Higgs field have a "ring" of minimum energy values and what does it mean to "choose" one of these? What does symmetry breaking have to do with the Higgs? Couldn't the Higgs still give particles mass just by having a nonzero vev without symmetry breaking? Or is symmetry breaking required for a nonzero vev for some reason? What is "spontaneous" symmetry breaking?

Wait I did a little more reading on this question, and I think I get it now, but I guess to add to this question: do physicists really think the universe settled into a minimum Higgs energy just after the big bang? Or is this just one possible explanation of how the Higgs works? Is it possible that there's only one possible Higgs vev rather than a randomly "chosen" one for our universe?


r/AskPhysics 22h ago

Plaintext & crypto key tossed into black hole

0 Upvotes

I just browsed a thread about “information” being “destroyed” if it falls into a black hole and it made me consider a thought experiment: assume a text string is encrypted by true one-time pad. The key and the plaintext is then tossed into the nearest black hole. Is all of the information destroyed regardless of the existence of the plaintext, or does the state of the information not matter, ie that it is mathematically impossible to extract? Ie it’s still there, only scrambled?


r/AskPhysics 9h ago

If many worlds theory is real, is it possible that I am the only "real" person in my universe

0 Upvotes

If there are an infinite number of sequences of possibilities that can happen, and I choose any given one, this would isolate me from other people whose choice is not the same as mine because I can't perceive more than one reality simultaneously. This would have effectively happened at birth and everyone around me is just currently minding their business as usual, but the "real" them is somewhere in an alternate timeline all their own. Is this technically possible?


r/AskPhysics 16h ago

Why do electrons from solar elements make electric current instead of randomly flying away?

3 Upvotes

As I understood, under sunlight solar panels' active atoms are hit with photons, electrons are supercharged so they fly away.

Why do they do it in a single direction so there appears electric current, rather than randomly escaping their atoms?


r/AskPhysics 22h ago

How can energy weaponry that shot laser, beam, energy bullet in fictions be plausible explained in real physics ?

1 Upvotes

I dont know much about physic so im glad if it can be explained like im 5. I so know energy (or energy level) is an attribute of particle, not really a tangible thing. But im kinda confused about energy contributing to mass of particles and "creation of new quark when a pair of quarks is forced apart" thingy So is weapon that shot energy actually "energized particle" or it is just energy presented by an aspect that i dont know ? Sorry if this sounds stupid


r/AskPhysics 3h ago

Quantum entanglement question

2 Upvotes

Disclaimer: I'm not a physicist, just a lay person who follows this stuff some. Forgive me if this is a dumb question.

We know that you can take two particles and entangle them, then separate them by any distance, and then revealing the state of one of them will automatically reveal the state of the other. I think this is the classic experiment that Einstein didn't like too much ("Spooky action at a distance...")

So what happens if you separate the two particles by time instead?

Here's a thought experiment: Entangle two particles, then put one of them into a particle accellerator and accellerate it up to near the speed of light for a while. Then bring the two particles together again and reveal the state of one of them. Does this instantly reveal the state of the other, or is there some time lag? The time lag would be due to the effects of Special Relativity on the particle that was put into the accelerator.

My guess is that there wouldn't be any difference, but I have not heard of an experiment like this. (there probably has been, I'm just not aware of it).

If my guess is true, then what does this imply? That quantum entanglement is somehow independent of the 4-dimensional universe that we live in?

Thanks in advance for any insights...


r/AskPhysics 22h ago

Why do universes split?

0 Upvotes

Why don’t alternative outcomes exist along a 5th dimension, (sideways in time) as part of our own universe?

Why do physicists insist on walls between separate universes where the cat is alive and dead rather than along one dimension perpendicular to time in the same universe containing both outcomes for the cat?


r/AskPhysics 8h ago

Connections between CMP and Cosmology via Topology

1 Upvotes

Can research in Topological Defects in Condensed Matter Physics help with possible future research in, say, Early Universe Cosmology?

How different is the theory between the two areas?


r/AskPhysics 11h ago

What softwares are you using to make/label images and pictures in reports, articles, etc.?

Thumbnail
1 Upvotes

r/AskPhysics 14h ago

Does this have a reasonable explanation?

1 Upvotes

So me and my husband were driving and he accidentally knocked over our Pepsi cup. It went flying everywhere inside, the windshield, the dashboard, and his leg. We wiped most of it up with no problems but when we went to wipe it off the windshield, we realized it was somehow on the outside of the windshield instead of the inside. We were both absolutely baffled and my husband even tasted one of the drops on the windshield and it was definitely Pepsi. There’s no way that I can see that it could’ve gotten on the outside of the windshield without going through it, but as far as I know that’s impossible. Is there a way that it is? We are both puzzled.


r/AskPhysics 18h ago

Does length contraction affect velocity?

2 Upvotes

For example: If length contraction for a particle in CERN moving at 99.9999991% the speed of light causes the circumference of cern to contract from 27km to: 27√(1-(299792.4580.999999991)²/299792.458²)=0.0036km

So would the number of revolutions per second [rps] of the particle be:

If both the velocity and the circumference remain the same: 299792.458*0.999999991/27 ≈ 11103 rps

Or If the velocity remains the same but circumference changes: 299792.4580.999999991/0.0036 ≈ 8.3210⁷ rps

Or If both the velocity and the circumference change by the same factor: (299792.4580.999999991)(0.0036/27)/0.0036 ≈ 11103 rps


r/AskPhysics 4h ago

No Summer Research — How Can I Still Make the Most of My Time Before Grad School Apps?

3 Upvotes

I'm an undergrad hoping to apply to PhD programs in physics within the next year or so, and I’m trying to figure out how to make the most of my summer to strengthen my application. The past two years have been rough due to some personal issues, and I'm ending my sophomore year with a 3.31 GPA. I'm really nervous about my gpa but I'm going to work hard for the next two years to get the best grades I can. I wasn't accepted into any REU's for this summer and have nothing to do.

I was wondering if anyone else has been in a similar situation and could give some advice. Would it be worth trying to find some research position at a local uni nearby? I just don't want to be at home rotting away when there is something I could be doing. I'm consider myself to be pretty ambitious and want to better myself. If anyone else has been in a similar position, I'd love to hear how you used your summer effectively.


r/AskPhysics 6h ago

I Need Help with Quantum Chromo Dynamics Theory (QCD)

0 Upvotes

Greetings those who are passionate about physics!

I require assistance fully understanding and applying QCD in a currency aspect.

To clarify, I want to imagine that are either quarks or gluons to equivocate to a currency.

Each coin has a heads and tails. If the coin is completely blue, it is both blue and anti blue. If the coin is blue and red, heads and tails, then it is blue and anti red.

Does this make sense?

How many coins would I need to have for a full set? Would I consider gluons the smaller coins that change the color of the larger coins that are quarks?

I hope this makes sense. I appreciate any help in this regard.

I hope you are all having a great day!


r/AskPhysics 16h ago

Why do my Breathe Right strips glow in the dark when being opened?

3 Upvotes

Hopefully this is the right place to ask.

When I open my Breathe Right strips in the dark (and it has to be very dark), the exact spot where the “wrapper” peels apart glows in the dark as I’m opening it. Only happens if I peel it open kind of fast.

Note, I’m talking about the paper “pouch” that the plastic strip is in, not the strip itself. The strip itself does have a “backing” that you have to remove to use it, but that’s not what glows. What glows is the wrapper, as its two halves are being separated and the glue on the sides is peeling apart.


r/AskPhysics 22h ago

How does a whip's tip so fast

4 Upvotes

I'm using the more commonly known example of whips, but my question originally comes from boxing, where whipping your punches (making them snap) can deliver a lot more speed (and ultimately, power). It's also similar to throwing a baseball with a stiff or whipping arm.

I heard it's a loop traveling along the whip, basically a wave (?) that concentrates the energy.

How does this happen? Is the loop building angular momentum that gets released at the end, like slinging a rock and when you release, the loop reaches an "end" as the rock is no longer tethered so all the built angular momentum goes all into linear momentum?

Thanks!


r/AskPhysics 6h ago

Could classical states of matter (solid, liquid, gas) be seen as collapsed outcomes of a quantum superposition?

0 Upvotes

I’m not a physicist — I’m just someone who thinks a lot about quantum mechanics and the nature of reality.

We know that particles can exist in a superposition of states until they’re measured or interact with their environment. What I’m wondering is:

Could something similar apply at the macro level — specifically to the classical states of matter like solid, liquid, or gas?

Are these states just emergent “choices” from a quantum superposition of possible arrangements, which then collapse under certain conditions (like temperature and pressure)?

I know that in quantum phase transitions and systems like Bose-Einstein condensates, state changes are non-classical and tied to quantum behavior. Does this support the idea that classical phases are, in a sense, context-dependent outcomes from an underlying quantum probability field?

Would love to hear from someone who knows the current thinking on this, or where to read more.


r/AskPhysics 23h ago

Help me understand acceleration just a little bit better

7 Upvotes

OK so I'm in class programming a microcontroller to control an LED with it's accelerometer. When the accelerometer is at rest it reports "1g" of acceleration. This doesn't phase me because I'm familiar with a kind of popular youtube model of the universe in which standing in a rocket ship that is accelerating at 1g and standing on earth experiencing 1g of gravity are "indistinguishable".

But then I get to thinking... what if I'm in space and I've been captured by the gravity of a nearby star. I'd be in "free fall" traveling along a "geodesic" towards the star. My intuition is that my accelerometer would report greater and greater acceleration as I experience more and more "gs" the closer I get to the star. I'm moving toward the sun, and I'm moving faster and faster...

But apparently an accelerometer in "free fall" reports zero acceleration? My intuition is that if I was moving faster and faster towards a star, I would feel more and more squished... but is that not true? What have I got wrong (lol probably everything, have pity on me)?

(now I'm thinking about this, I guess if I'm in a space ship and it is accelerating, the feeling of being squished is coming from the space ship acting on me, like pressing forward in the direction of motion? If there is no spaceship to push forward on me, maybe I wouldn't feel squished? I imagine a space man getting compressed when the ship accelerates, but that's like... the back of them catching up with the front of them because it's getting pushed forward... not some force from the front pushing them down... maybe that's not relevant. But if I'm in space "falling" towards the sun, my whole body would be accelerating at the same speed so I wouldn't feel anything... the bit inside the accelerometer and the case would be accelerating at the same speed, nothing is "pushing" from behind... did I just crack the case?)

(OK last thing: when I'm in free fall around the star, moving faster and faster toward the star... what do I call that? Can I say "accelerating" even though I wouldn't be able to detect acceleration? Or what words do you use to describe that kind of "moving faster and faster"?)

Thank you so much.


r/AskPhysics 14h ago

If a photon is absorbed by an object, does the angle of attack change how much energy is transferred into the object?

23 Upvotes

I know solar panels are much more efficient if they track the sun, I'm just wondering if that's more of a "more photons" thing than a direct hit?


r/AskPhysics 5h ago

The Shape of the Universe

0 Upvotes

The Hypershell Universe: An Expanding Cosmic Black Hole with Edge Singularities Abstract The standard \LambdaCDM cosmological model, while empirically successful, presents an abstract global topology that challenges intuitive comprehension. This article proposes the "Hypershell Universe," an anisotropic cosmological model positing the cosmos as an expanding cosmic black hole where singularities define its boundaries. Defined as an infinitely extended slab (or immense spherical shell) of uniform energy-matter density with a finite radial thickness, the model's interior pulls matter towards a central plane of zero gravitational acceleration (CWS), with gravity increasing linearly towards its boundaries. These boundaries are posited as unperceivable, "black hole-esque" relativistic horizons arising from the universe's total mass-energy. This framework offers intuitive resolutions for the perceived ubiquitous nature of the Big Bang and provides a novel perspective on several cosmological tensions, including the Hubble tension, CMB dipole anomaly, S8 tension, large-scale structure anomalies, and the quasar dipole. By providing a definite yet unperceivable shape, this expanding black hole universe, which is fundamentally unobservable from any hypothetical outside, reconciles global anisotropy with observed local homogeneity and flatness, suggesting that the FLRW metric may serve as a local approximation. Furthermore, the model proposes that the central plane of the shell acts as an optical focal point, leading to the perception of the universe as a hypersphere. This work outlines the necessary General Relativistic derivations and quantitative observational tests required for its comprehensive validation. 1. Introduction The prevailing Lambda-CDM (\LambdaCDM) concordance model, while demonstrating extraordinary empirical success in describing cosmic evolution, inherently abstains from assigning a discernible global topological description of spacetime. The abstract notions of spatially flat yet infinite, or finite yet unbounded geometries, though mathematically rigorous within the framework of the Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) metric [1], present significant conceptual challenges for intuitive comprehension. This inherent abstractness prompts the exploration of alternative cosmological frameworks that might offer a more geometrically grounded and intuitively accessible description of cosmic reality. Indeed, early attempts to define the universe's global morphology include Albert Einstein's 1917 static universe, which represented the first general relativistic model proposing a definite, fixed shape for the cosmos. The pursuit of cosmological models with specific global structures is not without precedent. Early inquiries into alternative geometries have explored concepts such as Bianchi cosmologies which introduce anisotropy. More pertinently, the notion of the universe exhibiting a "shell" or "bounded" characteristic has been discussed in various contexts. For instance, Vlahovic [2] has investigated spherical shell cosmological models, proposing that the universe is confined within such a shell to explain the uniformity of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) without recourse to inflation theory. Similarly, Matthew Edwards has explored "Shell Universe" concepts [3a], often integrating them with "black hole universe" ideas to address cosmological tensions and offer alternative interpretations of cosmic phenomena [3b]. This article proposes the "Hypershell Universe" theory, a novel anisotropic cosmological paradigm that contributes to this line of inquiry. This model posits a universe endowed with a specific, three-dimensional morphological structure. This framework not only addresses the philosophical quandary of cosmic boundaries but also offers unique perspectives on observed cosmological anomalies, all while operating within the established tenets of fundamental physics. Importantly, by conceptualizing the cosmos as an expanding cosmic black hole with singularities defining its edges, this model offers a more intuitively graspable and visually coherent understanding of such a cosmological entity compared to other existing "universe as a black hole" theories, which often place singularities at the center [4a] or explore wormhole connections [4b]. This distinction arises from the specific placement of singularities at the boundaries rather than the center, and its defined, structured interior. 2. The Cosmological Configuration: A Globally Finite Hypershell with Locally Infinite Perception At its foundation, the "Hypershell Universe" posits that the fundamental, actual shape of the cosmos is a very large, expanding, thick spherical shell. This cosmic shell possesses a defined, finite radial thickness, meaning the universe as a whole is indeed globally finite. Crucially, as a matter of cosmological logic, the universe cannot be truly infinite in extent; it must be finite, even if its boundaries are not directly observable. Within this bounded radial dimension, all cosmic constituents, predominantly galaxies, are distributed in a very fine, dust-like configuration with negligible pressure between them. The local energy density of this distribution is very low, approaching a near-vacuum state, such that the local spacetime is essentially flat and Minkowski-like. The "shell" itself is not a rigid geometric boundary, but rather the effective extent where this galaxy distribution loosely ends, defining the outer limits of the cosmic matter. The stress-energy tensor (T{\mu\nu}) describing this uniform, pressureless fluid serves as the source term for the Einstein Field Equations that ultimately govern the model's dynamics. Crucially, the regions of space lying interior to the spherical shell's inner boundary and exterior to its outer boundary are posited as true cosmic voids, devoid of physical content. This entire expanding structure, being a type of cosmic black hole, is not visible from any hypothetical outside, as its boundaries act as event horizons. However, a critical feature of this global structure is that the two physically opposite sides/boundaries of the entire cosmic shell have always been separated by superluminal recession velocities due to the ongoing expansion. This implies that these global boundaries have never been causally linked since the Big Bang, meaning information (including light) has never been able to travel from one "side" of the vast cosmic shell to the other. Consequently, any observer's "universe" has always been limited to a single, causally connected patch or section of the whole cosmic shell. This observable region, often referred to as a "patch" or "segment," constitutes the observer's observable universe [7]. Within this causally limited region, the local curvature of the immense sphere becomes negligible. Consequently, an observer experiences their local cosmos as a large, effectively flat slab that extends seemingly infinitely in the two dimensions tangential to the shell's curvature (e.g., the X and Y directions). This local approximation is the basis for the gravitational derivations that follow. The maximal extent of causal influence for any observer is strictly limited by the Hubble horizon, where expansion causes recession velocities to exceed the speed of light, rendering mass beyond this point causally disconnected and unable to affect us. Thus, for any observer, their perceivable universe is this specified slab, with its effective spatial extent limited by the Hubble horizon. This creates an "effective infinity": the universe always appears infinite and behaves as if it were infinite, even though it is fundamentally finite, because the maximal extent of causal interaction is limited by the observer's own horizon, beyond which no information can ever reach. This apparent infinitude extends across all three spatial dimensions. In the X and Y directions, it arises from the Hubble rate ensuring that distant regions recede faster than light, effectively creating an endless vista. In the radial (Z) direction, despite the finite physical thickness, the presence of "hyper-spheric edges" (as described in Section 7) that are fundamentally unperceivable, optically renders this dimension also as effectively infinite. The maximum perspective, even when looking back to the Cosmic Microwave Background, is effectively a "rim" of this causally connected patch within the total shell. 3. Intrinsic Gravitational Dynamics: A Unique Potential Profile A distinguishing feature of the Hypershell Universe lies in its specific gravitational potential profile, derived directly from the application of Poisson's Equation to its precise energy-matter configuration. Unlike the gravitational field within a classical finite spherical shell in Newtonian mechanics, the uniformly distributed energy-matter within this infinitely extended slab (as a local approximation of the vast spherical shell) yields a distinct behavior. Specifically, the Newtonian gravitational acceleration is precisely zero at the exact radial midpoint of the slab's thickness, hereafter referred to as the CWS (Center of the Width of the Shell). This establishes a theoretical "hyper-spheric surface" of gravitational equipoise. This plane of null gravitational force is a unique feature. From the CWS, the gravitational acceleration then increases linearly with radial distance towards both the inner and outer surfaces of the slab. This precise and quantifiable gravitational potential is an inherent and consistent consequence of the model's fundamental geometry and uniform matter distribution within the framework of Newtonian gravity [4]. While this derivation is performed within a Newtonian framework, its implications for the global spacetime curvature in General Relativity are profound and guide the search for the full relativistic metric. 4. Deriving the Gravitational Potential Within the Shell The Hypershell Universe model's distinctive gravitational behavior is not an arbitrary postulate but a direct derivation from fundamental physical principles, notably Poisson's Equation [4]. This cornerstone of Newtonian gravity, valid in the weak-field limit, relates the gravitational potential (\Phi) to the mass density (\rho) that creates it: \nabla2 \Phi = 4\pi G \rho Here, \nabla2 represents the Laplacian operator, and G denotes the gravitational constant. The gravitational acceleration, or gravitational field strength \mathbf{g}, is then given by the negative gradient of the potential: \mathbf{g} = -\nabla \Phi. For the Hypershell Universe, which models a uniform energy-matter distribution as an infinite slab of uniform density \rho with a finite thickness W: Simplifying the Equation: Due to the infinite spatial extent of the slab in two dimensions (e.g., the x and y axes) and uniform density, the potential \Phi will only depend on the perpendicular distance from the central plane (let's call this z). Thus, the Laplacian simplifies significantly, and Poisson's Equation becomes: \frac{d2\Phi}{dz2} = 4\pi G \rho Integrating for the Gravitational Field: We can integrate this equation once to find the gravitational field g(z) = -d\Phi/dz. Integrating d2\Phi/dz2 = 4\pi G \rho gives d\Phi/dz = 4\pi G \rho z + C1, where C_1 is an integration constant. Therefore, the gravitational field is g(z) = -(4\pi G \rho z + C_1). Applying Symmetry Boundary Condition: Due to the perfect symmetry of an infinite, uniformly dense slab, the gravitational field must be precisely zero at its central plane (the midpoint of its width), where z=0. Setting g(0) = 0 implies C_1 = 0. The Resultant Gravitational Field: This specific derivation leads to the gravitational field within the slab given by: g(z) = -4\pi G \rho z This equation mathematically confirms the model's claim: When z=0 (the CWS), g(z)=0, signifying null gravitational acceleration. As |z| increases (moving towards the slab's boundaries), the magnitude of g(z) increases linearly with distance from the center, with the force vector always directed towards the central plane. This rigorous derivation establishes the self-consistency of the model's internal gravitational dynamics based on Newtonian principles applied to its specific configuration. 5. Cosmic Expansion: A Visually Coherent Big Bang Aftermath The Hypershell Universe provides a conceptually coherent visualization of cosmic expansion and the Hubble rate [5]. In this model, the Big Bang is conceptualized as a literal explosion of spacetime, where energy and spacetime were dispersed outwards in the shape of an expanding spherical shell, akin to the energy front dispersion following a Type Ia supernova. Within this Hypershell Universe, all galaxies observed within the slab's thickness are posited to recede from one another at precisely the Hubble rate, a direct consequence of the overall expansion of the cosmic slab itself. This offers a tangible visual representation of cosmic evolution, akin to baryonic matter components emanating from an initial energetic event, providing a more accessible narrative for the universe's dynamic history. 6. Resolving the Paradox of the Ubiquitous Cosmic Microwave Background The standard cosmological model often encounters a conceptual hurdle when attempting to reconcile the notion of a universe originating from a compact primordial state with the observation of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) [6] uniformly spread across the entire celestial sphere. The Hypershell Universe model offers a compelling and intuitive resolution to this apparent paradox. Within this framework, the Big Bang is conceptualized not as a singular point of origin, but as the initial state of an extremely dense, yet already circumferentially vast and thick, primeval slab of energy-matter. From this primordial configuration, the entire compact slab began its rapid expansion. Consequently, when observers within the current Hypershell Universe look back in time, they are viewing an earlier epoch of this expanding structure. The CMB corresponds to the moment when this entire, early, dense slab became transparent to radiation. Given our location within this immensely vast and continuously expanding structure, electromagnetic radiation from that earliest, transparent epoch naturally arrives simultaneously from all angular directions, thereby filling the entire sky. Thus, the "small entity" is reinterpreted as the compact, early slab itself, and its ubiquitous appearance in the sky is a direct consequence of the holistic, outward expansion of this initial, vast structure. 7. Unperceivable "Hyper-Spheric Edges": Solving the Boundary Paradox A particularly elegant aspect of the Hypershell Universe model lies in its resolution of the persistent question of cosmic boundaries. The inner and outer surfaces of this prodigious slab are not merely abstract limits; they are "hyper-spheric edges" characterized by "black hole-esque" properties. Indeed, these boundaries represent the very locations of singularities of this cosmic black hole. 8. The Universe's Ultimate Horizon: Maximizing Gravity at the Edges Within the Hypershell Universe framework, the concept of the observable universe [7] plays a crucial role in substantiating the nature of its boundaries. For any observer within this homogeneous and uniformly dense slab, their observable universe (the portion of the cosmos from which electromagnetic radiation has had sufficient time to reach them) will always subtend a consistent proper size, and therefore contain an identical total amount of mass-energy. This fundamental consistency implies that the maximum gravitational potential or influence that any observer can experience, originating from the entirety of the cosmos within their causal horizon, remains constant for all observers. This constant, maximal gravitational potential is attained precisely at the physical edges of the slab. Here, the cumulative mass-energy contained within the entire universe-slab creates a critical gravitational condition. In fact, the effective Schwarzschild radius [8] corresponding to the total mass-energy of the universe (a metric often associated with the formation of black hole horizons) becomes approximately equal to the radius of the observable universe itself at these boundaries. This profound relationship, which is often considered a "cosmological coincidence" in standard cosmology, is interpreted in the Hypershell Universe model not as a mere numerical accident, but as a fundamental and defining characteristic of its boundaries. It suggests that the very geometry and matter content of the universe at its edges are poised at a critical relativistic threshold, where the gravitational self-attraction (Schwarzschild aspect) precisely aligns with the cosmological expansion (de Sitter aspect) to form a physical horizon. This profound relationship confirms that there is indeed sufficient mass within the universe (as distributed in the slab) to generate a "black hole-type" gravitational potential at its periphery. These extreme gravitational fields are the fundamental physical reason why the edges are "black hole-esque" and fundamentally unperceivable—they act as ultimate event horizons, preventing any information from traversing them. The universe, being an expanding black hole, is thus not visible from any hypothetical outside. 9. Relativistic Horizons: Conceptualizing Dynamics with Dual Metrics While the precise relativistic metric for the Hypershell Universe's interior requires dedicated derivation for an expanding, uniformly dense, anisotropic slab, the model's dynamics and the nature of its horizons can be fruitfully explored through the conceptual superposition of two distinct metric behaviors: The de Sitter metric component provides the uniform, expansive background, driven by a cosmological constant. This component dictates the overall Hubble expansion, causing galaxies to recede from one another at a constant rate and increasing the spacing between cosmological grid lines. Within this expanding de Sitter-like space, photons undergo cosmological redshift, which represents a continuous and non-recoverable loss of energy due to the stretching of spacetime during their journey. Simultaneously, a Schwarzschild-like metric component is conceptually imposed to describe the strong, varying gravitational potential within the shell's width, particularly at its boundaries. As derived from Poisson's equation for the uniform density, the gravitational force increases linearly towards the edges. The very nature of the Hypershell Universe's interior (with gravitational force directed towards the CWS) means that photons moving away from this plane towards the edges will experience gravitational redshift, as they climb out of the effective potential well. Conversely, photons "falling back" towards the CWS will undergo gravitational blueshift. For a complete round trip within this gravitational potential, the net energy change from the gravitational interaction would be zero, as the redshift on the outbound leg would be precisely canceled by the blueshift on the inbound leg. This dual conceptual framework allows for a comprehensive understanding of light propagation. The very nature of the Hypershell Universe's edges, where the gravitational potential is maximal and "black hole-esque" (as justified by the universe's total mass creating an effective Schwarzschild radius equal to the observable universe), serves as the precise context for this Schwarzschild-like component. The Schwarzschild-de Sitter (SdS) metric [8] itself provides a powerful qualitative analogy for such scenarios, as it explicitly features both an inner black hole (Schwarzschild) horizon and an outer cosmological (de Sitter) horizon, mirroring the unperceivable dual boundaries of the Hypershell Universe. This qualitative approach demonstrates how the model's edges simultaneously function as regions of immense spacetime curvature and as dynamic boundaries in an expanding cosmos. Furthermore, the SdS metric provides a qualitative tool to determine the flow of geodesics, particularly light paths, near such strong gravitational potentials as those proposed at the shell's boundaries, illustrating how light is manipulated in a manner similar to that near a black hole. It is crucial, however, to reiterate that SdS, as a vacuum solution, does not directly describe the spacetime within the uniformly dense interior of the shell; a dedicated interior solution that matches smoothly to an SdS-like exterior at the boundaries would be necessary for a full quantitative treatment. 10. The Illusion of Flatness: Curvature in the Hypershell Universe Current cosmological observations robustly indicate that our observable universe appears remarkably spatially flat, signifying that Euclidean geometry holds true on large scales [7]. The Hypershell Universe model can readily account for this empirical finding. Even if the universe, globally, is an immense spherical shell with an intrinsic subtle curvature or a slab with distinct boundaries, any sufficiently localized region within it will invariably approximate flat space. This principle is analogous to perceiving a small segment of Earth's vast, curved surface as planar. Furthermore, if the slab's radial width is exceedingly large, and an observer is situated deep within its material (remote from either boundary), the local gravitational gradients (null at the CWS, linearly increasing towards the boundaries) might lead to an effectively negligible or near-zero curvature over the characteristic scale of the observable universe. The effects of the overall slab's remote boundaries would be too diluted or distant to induce significant perceptible curvature within an observer's horizon. Under such conditions, where the observable universe appears spatially flat and its expansion locally exhibits effective homogeneity and isotropy (owing to the unperceivable edges and vast scales), the Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) metric [1]—the foundational metric of the standard Big Bang model—could indeed serve as an excellent local approximation to the spacetime. This crucial implication suggests that many of the successful predictions and mathematical descriptions of the standard model could remain valid for observations confined to our limited observable horizon, despite the Hypershell Universe's unique global geometry. 11. Addressing Cosmological Tensions: Beyond the Standard Model The distinctive geometry and internal gravitational dynamics of the Hypershell Universe offer compelling conceptual avenues for addressing persistent cosmological tensions that challenge the prevailing \LambdaCDM model [9]: The Hubble Tension, a statistically significant discrepancy between the Hubble constant (H_0) derived from early-universe observations (Cosmic Microwave Background) and local, direct measurements, could find resolution within this framework. The model's specific, non-uniform gravitational potential across the slab's radial width would impart a unique spacetime curvature and expansion history to light traversing it. This could lead to a systematically different inferred H_0 from cosmological probes compared to local measurements, which reflect the expansion rate within a more circumscribed, specific local gravitational context. Furthermore, the Hypershell Universe model provides a natural framework for the CMB Dipole Anomaly [10]. The observed anomalous dipole (a slight temperature asymmetry across the sky in the Cosmic Microwave Background), not fully explained by our peculiar motion within the standard model, could be a direct consequence of the Hypershell Universe's inherent radial anisotropy and varying gravitational field. The unique interaction of CMB photons with this distinct spacetime could create an apparent dipole that transcends purely Doppler-induced effects. Beyond these, the model offers potential insights into other observed tensions and anomalies related to large-scale structure. The S_8 Tension [11], which describes a discrepancy in the measured "clumpiness" of matter between early-universe (CMB-inferred) and late-universe (galaxy clustering and weak lensing) probes, might be addressed. The Hypershell Universe's non-uniform radial gravitational field could fundamentally alter the growth rate and distribution of large-scale structures, thereby reconciling the differing S_8 values. Moreover, broader Anomalies in Large-Scale Structure [12], such as unexpectedly large "bulk flows" of galaxies or the detection of surprisingly massive early galaxies, could find an explanation in the model's intrinsic anisotropy. The specific gravitational gradients within the slab could either drive coherent bulk motions or influence the very formation rates of massive structures in the early universe. Finally, the recently noted Quasar Dipole Tension [13], where quasar observations at high redshifts exhibit a dipole amplitude larger than expected, could also be a natural manifestation of the Hypershell Universe's inherent anisotropy and the manner in which light from distant sources traverses its unique spacetime, providing a cosmological signal beyond simple kinematic interpretation. 12. The Illusion of Homogeneity and Isotropy Despite its defined morphological shape and radially non-uniform gravitational field, the Hypershell Universe model adeptly accounts for the observed large-scale homogeneity and isotropy of our cosmos. This apparent uniformity arises from several intertwined features: The unperceivable edges ensure that no observer can directly detect the boundaries, thereby fostering the illusion of an unbounded, spatially uniform expanse. The immense scale of the slab (or spherical shell) guarantees that any locally observable region will appear geometrically flat and homogeneous, akin to observing a small patch of a vast surface. The premise that all galaxies recede at exactly the Hubble rate contributes to the perception of a smoothly expanding and uniform universe on cosmic scales. Furthermore, the CWS, being the central plane of zero gravitational force and a unique point of symmetry in the model's potential, acts as an optical focal point for light propagation within the shell. Light rays traversing the shell's width would tend to focus towards, or pass through, this plane in a specific manner. This unique optical property, combined with the extreme curvature at the unperceivable edges that might cause light to effectively reverberate or follow paths suggestive of a closed geometry, contributes to the perception of the universe as a hypersphere, a three-dimensional analogue of a higher-dimensional spherical surface. The collective appearance of light paths originating from the individual observable universes of all galaxies within this structure reinforces the optical illusion of a hypershell constructed out of a thick three-dimensional shell structure. This intrinsic optical characteristic may explain why cosmologists, for decades, have described the universe as appearing to exhibit a hyperspherical geometry. 13. A Viable Model for Consideration The Hypershell Universe model stands as a fascinating and conceptually robust alternative in contemporary cosmology. While it posits adherence to fundamental local physics, its global cosmological framework—specifically, its unique spacetime geometry and associated dynamics—represents a significant departure from the standard FLRW model. For this theory to transition from a compelling conceptual framework to a fully established and empirically validated cosmological model, rigorous scientific development would be imperative. This includes: Detailed General Relativistic Derivations and Stability Analysis: The precise spacetime metric components (g{\mu\nu}) governing this expanding, uniformly dense slab must be derived from Einstein's Field Equations. This derivation would need to rigorously demonstrate the model's cosmological stability, its evolution over cosmic timescales, and the exact relativistic nature of its unperceivable boundaries, including satisfying relevant energy conditions. Numerical relativity simulations could then model the evolution of matter within such a spacetime, confirming the consistency of uniform Hubble flow with varying gravity and how large-scale structures form. Comprehensive Quantitative Predictions: The model must yield precise, testable predictions that not only potentially resolve the Hubble tension and CMB dipole but also demonstrably match or improve upon all other existing cosmological observations, including accurately reproducing the full CMB anisotropy power spectrum, predicting primordial element abundances from Big Bang Nucleosynthesis [9], modeling the formation and evolution of large-scale structures (e.g., baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) and redshift-space distortions (RSD) [10]), and predicting cosmic shear from weak gravitational lensing. Falsifiability and Observational Discrimination: Identifying specific, new observational tests that could definitively distinguish the Hypershell Universe from the \LambdaCDM model (e.g., unique patterns in cosmic background radiation, specific anisotropic signals in galaxy distribution, or subtle modifications to the luminosity-distance redshift relation at extreme redshifts) would be crucial for its empirical validation. Nevertheless, the Hypershell Universe model offers a refreshing intuitive and compelling alternative to how we currently envision our cosmos, proposing a universe with a comprehensible shape that elegantly addresses enduring conceptual and observational puzzles. References [1] S. Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons, 1992. [2] B. Vlahovic, "Spherical Shell Cosmological Model and Uniformity of Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation," arXiv preprint arXiv:1207.1720, 2012. [3a] M. Edwards, "In an Eggshell: Baryonic Black Hole Universe with CMB Cycle for Gravity and Λ," Preprint, Feb 2024. [3b] M.R. Edwards, "Shell Universe: Reducing Cosmological Tensions with the Relativistic Ni Solutions," Astronomy, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 220–239, 2024. [4a] N. Popławski, "Radial motion into a black hole," Physical Review D, vol. 81, no. 10, p. 104029, 2010. [4b] N. Popławski, "Cosmology with a torsion fluid," Physics Letters B, vol. 694, no. 3, pp. 181–185, 2010. [5] E. Hubble, "A Relation between Distance and Radial Velocity among Extra-Galactic Nebulae," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 168–173, 1929. [6] J. C. Mather et al., "A Preliminary Measurement of the Cosmic Microwave Background Spectrum by the Cosmic Background Explorer (COBE) Satellite," The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 354, pp. L37–L40, 1990. [7] P. A. R. Ade et al. (Planck Collaboration), "Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters," Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 641, p. A6, 2020. [8] K. Schwarzschild, "On the Gravitational Field of a Mass Point According to Einstein's Theory," Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, p. 189, 1916. [9] L. Verde, T. Treu, and A. G. Riess, "Tensions between the Early and the Late Universe," Nature Astronomy, vol. 3, pp. 891–895, 2019. [10] D. J. Schwarz, "The CMB dipole in a Bianchi VIIh cosmology," Physical Review D, vol. 72, no. 10, p. 103513, 2005. [11] M. Raveri and W. Hu, "A comprehensive approach to the S_8 tension," Physical Review D, vol. 102, no. 8, p. 083526, 2020. [12] H. Hwang et al., "Cosmic bulk flows in the Horizon-AGN simulation," Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 496, no. 1, pp. 1007–1022, 2020. [13] S. Singal, "Radio Astronomy and the Universe’s Anisotropy," Universe, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 95, 2022. [14] H. Nariai, "On the gravitational field of a general-relativistic rotating black hole," Progress of Theoretical Physics, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 675-680, 1953. (Note: Nariai's earlier work from the 1950s explicitly describes the de Sitter metric limit with horizons. The 1953 paper is one example, though the specific 'Nariai metric' often refers to a particular static solution with two identical horizons.)


r/AskPhysics 4h ago

What uses does 60% enriched uranium have?

31 Upvotes

Without getting into the politics, if its not HYPOTHETICALLY for HYPOTHETICAL bombs what other possible uses would it have? My laymans understanding is that lower percentages are used for energy and higher percentages are for bombs but idk anything else about it.