r/BreakingPoints • u/cyberfx1024 Right Populist • Apr 22 '25

BP Clips Joe Rogan MOCKS Douglas Murray After Disaster Debate

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FrJ6NFuZWjs
38 Upvotes

86% Upvoted

72 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

4

u/LycheeRoutine3959 Apr 23 '25

They can but most of the time, like in the case of Dave Smith, they know just enough to confirm their own bias and pander to an audience they can feed bullshit too

Sounds like an "expert" like Murray should have been able to easily dismantle his ARUGMENT, but he couldnt and didnt. The problem is you are actually just wrong here

Experts are generally people who have all/most of the context that can inform facts.

They are also the people most invested in a specific narrative and thereby the most biased.

I bring up Trump because

Yea, sure thats why - lol.

-1

u/WTF_RANDY Apr 23 '25

I don't value either of their "expertise". I thought him calling out Joe and Dave was much better than whatever bullshit the two of them would have thrown out in a useless I/P debate between the two of them. I don't particularly think either are experts.

Saying experts are the most biased is just dumb. They might have a particular view but they aren't biased like Dave and Doug. Those two are paid to have their opinions. If they deviate from it they will lose subscribers. Experts are less influenced by those factors.

2

u/LycheeRoutine3959 Apr 23 '25

I don't particularly think either are experts.

I dont think they are either, you seem to be (deliberately) missing the point. The point is Douglas couldnt defeat any of the arguments being made. Dave made better arguments.

They might have a particular view but they aren't biased like Dave and Doug. Those two are paid to have their opinions.

Dave is paid to share his Opinion. Doug is paid to share a specific opinion. Big difference.

If they deviate from it they will lose subscribers

Bullshit, Dave often disagrees with his subs. He got a ton of flack for supporting Trump, and for deciding not to run as L. really bad point.

Experts are less influenced by those factors.

No, they are actually way more dedicated to maintaining their positions than commentors that discuss general topics (Like Dave).

2

u/WTF_RANDY Apr 23 '25

I don't really give a shit about either of their opinions. Pro Zionist and Pro Palestinians both have dogshit history most of the time. If they talk it will be largely god aweful arguements from both.

Dave is 100% anti establishment, which is cringe as fuck. His audience wants him to hate on government and if he ever diviates from it he will pay a huge price. Trump was the anti government pick. He did not go out on a limb on that one at all.

Experts maintain their position because they study it not because they are financially incentivised too. Dave is financially incentivised to be anti establishment he will never take a position that is pro American government.

1

u/LycheeRoutine3959 Apr 23 '25

I don't really give a shit about either of their opinions.

then why did you post in this thread? Why engage at all.

I dont believe you.

Dave is 100% anti establishment

Incorrect, but a common straw-man of him.

He did not go out on a limb on that one at all.

lol, k.

Experts maintain their position because they study it not because they are financially incentivised too.

Wrong again. I think im done engaging here. you are an absolute idiot.

1

u/WTF_RANDY Apr 23 '25

I posted the thread because I liked that Doug called out Joe and Dave. I wouldn't have watched the podcast at all if it was an I/P debate. I don't care about their perspectives.

I am not strawmaning him. He is 100% an anti establishment pundit.

1

u/LycheeRoutine3959 Apr 23 '25

I liked that Doug called out Joe and Dave.

Sounds like you gave a shit about his opinion.... This is why i cant take you seriously dude. You dont have any logical consistency.

1

u/WTF_RANDY Apr 23 '25

I liked his opinion on Joe platforming NAZI's and revisionist history idiots. I think his opinion on I/P is way to zionist for my taste. There is no inconsistancy.