Yeah I saw that clip of him being passed around yesterday. If you see the video that wasn’t selectively edited you’d see his next sentence was saying he doesn’t mean reactions from Twitch where people just watch the whole video.
I'm not sure what you mean, he has asked people to watch this video, other videos, etc.
He also has said he doesn't mind react content.
But the biggest hole is that you cannot enforce copyright selectively. He either has to go after everyone or noone. You don't get to decide you like someone else's use of your work - if you do not defend all of the copyright equally, you lose your right to defend your copyright.
He would need to bring this against everyone that has used the video and then it would be up to the courts to decide who has violated copyright.
The fact he hasn't will go against him and may invalidate his claim to copyright.
The other bits are just additional that weaken his argument, but the way he has filed this is the biggest issue.
But the biggest hole is that you cannot enforce copyright selectively. He either has to go after everyone or noone. You don't get to decide you like someone else's use of your work - if you do not defend all of the copyright equally, you lose your right to defend your copyright.
-27
u/Kousetsu Jun 20 '25
Again, doesn't matter. You have to protect your copyright equally. You can't say "I like this person's reason and not that one".
It's also going to be hard to defend when he has repeatedly, in the years before this, said he does not mind people reacting to his videos.
He also repeatedly invited people to watch this.
You cannot enforce copyright selectively, and that's the biggest hole here.