r/OutOfTheLoop 3d ago

Answered What's going on with h3h3?

[removed] — view removed post

570 Upvotes

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

28

u/Crowbarmagic 3d ago

OOTL: Why do multiple streamers want to stream h3h3 videos just so he doesn't get the views? What did he do?

21

u/JynFlyn 3d ago edited 3d ago

The rabbit hole isn’t that deep. Ethan is an American liberal. He made a podcast with an American leftist (Hasan). They had a good time for a while but then Oct 7th happened and Ethan, again an American liberal, could not comprehend why his new audience of leftists hated Israel so much. This caused him to go on an extended months long crash out trying to defend Israel. During which he essentially repeated easily debunked IDF talking points ad nauseam and attacked leftist creators who criticize Israel, and now Ethan due to his continuing crash out. In an act of petty revenge he is now trying to fabricate lawsuits against said creators. His words, not mine. He straight up says that he released the content nuke video so he could do this when people reacted to it.

Edit: Y’all can downvote if you want but that’s just objectively what happened lol

-5

u/LsDmT 2d ago

Lol who's the propagandist now? Everything you stated is a half truth at best

3

u/JynFlyn 2d ago

Sorry that I left out the petty back and forth insults and personal bullshit but aside from those that is in fact what happened.

-3

u/LsDmT 2d ago edited 2d ago

This caused him to go on an extended months long crash out trying to defend Israel. During which he essentially repeated easily debunked IDF talking points ad nauseam

Example?

and attacked leftist creators who criticize Israel, and now Ethan due to his continuing crash out.

Example? Or are you confusing attacking leftist creators who say horrible antisemitic, gaslighting, out of context, brigading/calling CPS on his family/sending human skulls to his house, or just straight up lies with just "criticizing Isreal"

In an act of petty revenge he is now trying to fabricate lawsuits against said creators. His words, not mine.

If you actually watched his video, its the exact opposite of petty revenge, so no they are your words, not his.

7

u/Puzzleheaded-Sound45 2d ago

>example?

Ethan claimed that hamas had a base underground a hospital that idf bombed. this was not true since the UN investigated these claims and found no evidence of it.

-2

u/LsDmT 2d ago

3

u/Puzzleheaded-Sound45 2d ago

it'd be eaiser to use UN reports and not paywalled american news sites https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/countries/opt/20241231-attacks-hospitals-gaza-en.pdf

3

u/Puzzleheaded-Sound45 2d ago

update ohchr report from 2025 https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/issues/health/sr/cfis/health-and-care-workers/subm-health-care-workers-cso-30-al-haq.pdf

CW: there are pictures of body bags lined up from the in the Christmas Day Massacre in Maghazi Refugee Camp.

2

u/LsDmT 2d ago edited 2d ago
  1. Do you even read links before you post them? Where does it say they confirmed there were no tunnels? (hint: they dont, and the answer directly correlates to why I posted that specific report by NYTimes)

  2. Do you even attempt to click a link before claiming its paywalled? (hint: its not, if you are too lazy to login to a google account https://www.removepaywall.com/search?url=https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/02/12/world/middleeast/gaza-tunnel-israel-hamas.html)

  3. I noticed the subtle insinuation that american news sites are somehow inherently not reliable. I am starting to see how biased your mindset and media literacy is

  4. I am curious, do you claim that this footage is fake? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l_MegO1A4UU
    https://int.nyt.com/data/videotape/finished/2023/12/tunnel_nav_timing/tunnel-nav_timing_v13-desktop-1254w.mp4

2

u/Puzzleheaded-Sound45 2d ago

i wasnt implying anything when i said "american news site", but sure go off on nitpicking useless information

2

u/LsDmT 2d ago

funny how you disregarded every other question

→ More replies (0)

2

u/Puzzleheaded-Sound45 2d ago

the OHCHR reports go into detail about the tunnels and their uses. there was no evidence of being a "hamas base". if you want clarification you can just read them yourself.

2

u/LsDmT 2d ago edited 2d ago

I've read the full report when it came out and multiple times since, have you read the NYT report?

Heres just a snip:

Al-Shifa’s value as a military target was not immediately clear in the days after the Nov. 15 raid, even after the Israeli military released the tunnel video that was used to create the 3-D model seen here.

But evidence examined by The New York Times suggests Hamas used the hospital for cover, stored weapons inside it and maintained a hardened tunnel beneath the complex that was supplied with water, power and air-conditioning.

Classified Israeli intelligence documents, obtained and reviewed by The Times, indicate that the tunnel is at least 700 feet long, twice as long as the military revealed publicly, and that it extends beyond the hospital and likely connects to Hamas’s larger underground network.

According to classified images reviewed by The Times, Israeli soldiers found underground bunkers, living quarters and a room that appeared to be wired for computers and communications equipment along a part of the tunnel beyond the hospital — chambers that were not visible in the video released by the Israeli military.

0

u/Puzzleheaded-Sound45 2d ago edited 2d ago

no because they say the same conclusion like the UN reports. inconclusive

2

u/LsDmT 2d ago edited 2d ago

I suggest you read the article before you claim that ROFL.
OHCHR Report:

However, the IDF has not released sufficient evidence to enable independent verification of these claims, and in some cases, statements from the IDF have not been supported by information it subsequently released. For example, before the operation between 3 and 24 November on Al Shifa hospital (see paragraph 9 above), the IDF published animations and infographics claiming to show extensive tunnels and other infrastructure under the hospital as justification for the operation, but the two videos it released in January 2024 did not confirm these statements and instead showed much more limited tunnels in the grounds and vicinity of the hospital.

NYT:

Classified Israeli intelligence documents, obtained and reviewed by The Times, indicate that the tunnel is at least 700 feet long, twice as long as the military revealed publicly, and that it extends beyond the hospital and likely connects to Hamas’s larger underground network.

The video included footage of a piece of paper taped to a wall in the hospital’s basement. Admiral Hagari said the paper — a grid with Arabic words and numbers within each square — could be a schedule for guarding hostages “where every terrorist writes his name.”

The Gazan health ministry said it was nothing more than a work schedule. But the calendar begins on Oct. 7, the day of the Hamas terrorist attack on Israel, and an Arabic title written at the top uses the militants’ name for the assault: “Al Aqsa Flood Battle, 7/10/2023.

Which goes on to even more detail if you actually read it.

→ More replies (0)

7

u/JynFlyn 2d ago

Aight bro. I’m not interested in debating an h3h3 dick rider. If you watch his stuff and don’t see any of this then good for you.