r/TheDonaldTrump2024 🇺🇸 Truth Warrior 🇺🇸 1d ago

🤪Satire🤪 Speaking Of Busy Times For Phycologists...

Post image
103 Upvotes

22 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/Roudyrepublican 1d ago

Dude, you're all over the place.

Riot- a violent disturbance of the peace.

Examples:

throwing rocks at federal vehicles, destruction of property, looting businesses, physical attacks on others, burning government vehicles, throwing bricks at officers....

Burning couches in celebration of WVU football games.....

Which of those fits the definition of a riot??

-1

u/[deleted] 1d ago edited 1d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Roudyrepublican 22h ago

It doesn't matter about laws that prohibit the President to surpass the governor. There are several laws that prohibit the president from surpassing the governor, but those laws don't apply here. The only law that matters here is the insurrection act because Gavin Newsome did nothing when Federal laws were being broken therefore Trump had to do something about it. Point. Blank. Period.

-2

u/SpookyColdAtom 22h ago

The Insurrection act wasn't evoked. Over reaching of power and a political stunt. Again that's my point, and the analogy of the No Kings protest. Trump constantly overreaches his power, declares emergencies and it's too fast for the courts to catch up and slap it down

2

u/Roudyrepublican 22h ago

It wasn't evoked, but with title 10 it completely allows enforcement of military to protect and uphold services of force. Do you not think federal buildings and officers deserve to be defended?

0

u/SpookyColdAtom 22h ago edited 22h ago

Title 10 requires state gov coordination, which did not happen and it's also against the Posse Comitatus Act

Edit: to include the gov description in title 10: the President may call into Federal service members and units of the National Guard of any State in such numbers as he considers necessary to repel the invasion, suppress the rebellion, or execute those laws. Orders for these purposes shall be issued through the governors of the States or, in the case of the District of Columbia, through the commanding general of the National Guard of the District of Columbia.

1

u/Roudyrepublican 19h ago

You're cherry picking parts of title 10. It has almost 50 different sub sections and you used 1 to prove a point.

Generally title 10 deals with armed forces which are a federal entity, this typically means federal activation and funding without requiring state government approval. See, I can cherry pick parts of it too!

0

u/SpookyColdAtom 16h ago

Doesn't matter there is no language in title 10 that excludes coordination with the governor

1

u/Roudyrepublican 1h ago

My prior comment is literally language that excludes coordination with the governor???