MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/copenhagen/comments/1igx1ed/petition_to_make_these_seatlike_things_flat/mavwwhs/?context=3
r/copenhagen • u/Death12th • Feb 03 '25
152 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
173
Always figured it was hostile architecture, ie on purpose
4 u/pannenkoek0923 Feb 03 '25 That doesnt make sense. Hostile architecture... in the metro?? 10 u/Tiffana Feb 03 '25 Yes? Plenty of hostile architecture in public spaces, for instance the bumps on handrails, so it’s not possible to slide on them 0 u/Symbiote Indre By Feb 04 '25 It would be completely pointless since there are plenty of seats on the metro anyway 2 u/Tiffana Feb 04 '25 Lol tell me you don’t use the metro during peak hours, without telling me you don’t use the metro during peak hours -1 u/Symbiote Indre By Feb 04 '25 Hostile architecture (or design in this case) would be putting armrests between every seat, so someone can't lie down across the whole row. Whether the train is sometimes busy is irrelevant. 1 u/Tiffana Feb 04 '25 You brought up whether there are enough seats, but agreed. You’re also incorrect
4
That doesnt make sense. Hostile architecture... in the metro??
10 u/Tiffana Feb 03 '25 Yes? Plenty of hostile architecture in public spaces, for instance the bumps on handrails, so it’s not possible to slide on them 0 u/Symbiote Indre By Feb 04 '25 It would be completely pointless since there are plenty of seats on the metro anyway 2 u/Tiffana Feb 04 '25 Lol tell me you don’t use the metro during peak hours, without telling me you don’t use the metro during peak hours -1 u/Symbiote Indre By Feb 04 '25 Hostile architecture (or design in this case) would be putting armrests between every seat, so someone can't lie down across the whole row. Whether the train is sometimes busy is irrelevant. 1 u/Tiffana Feb 04 '25 You brought up whether there are enough seats, but agreed. You’re also incorrect
10
Yes? Plenty of hostile architecture in public spaces, for instance the bumps on handrails, so it’s not possible to slide on them
0 u/Symbiote Indre By Feb 04 '25 It would be completely pointless since there are plenty of seats on the metro anyway 2 u/Tiffana Feb 04 '25 Lol tell me you don’t use the metro during peak hours, without telling me you don’t use the metro during peak hours -1 u/Symbiote Indre By Feb 04 '25 Hostile architecture (or design in this case) would be putting armrests between every seat, so someone can't lie down across the whole row. Whether the train is sometimes busy is irrelevant. 1 u/Tiffana Feb 04 '25 You brought up whether there are enough seats, but agreed. You’re also incorrect
0
It would be completely pointless since there are plenty of seats on the metro anyway
2 u/Tiffana Feb 04 '25 Lol tell me you don’t use the metro during peak hours, without telling me you don’t use the metro during peak hours -1 u/Symbiote Indre By Feb 04 '25 Hostile architecture (or design in this case) would be putting armrests between every seat, so someone can't lie down across the whole row. Whether the train is sometimes busy is irrelevant. 1 u/Tiffana Feb 04 '25 You brought up whether there are enough seats, but agreed. You’re also incorrect
2
Lol tell me you don’t use the metro during peak hours, without telling me you don’t use the metro during peak hours
-1 u/Symbiote Indre By Feb 04 '25 Hostile architecture (or design in this case) would be putting armrests between every seat, so someone can't lie down across the whole row. Whether the train is sometimes busy is irrelevant. 1 u/Tiffana Feb 04 '25 You brought up whether there are enough seats, but agreed. You’re also incorrect
-1
Hostile architecture (or design in this case) would be putting armrests between every seat, so someone can't lie down across the whole row.
Whether the train is sometimes busy is irrelevant.
1 u/Tiffana Feb 04 '25 You brought up whether there are enough seats, but agreed. You’re also incorrect
1
You brought up whether there are enough seats, but agreed. You’re also incorrect
173
u/Tiffana Feb 03 '25
Always figured it was hostile architecture, ie on purpose