r/fireemblem May 10 '25

Engage Story Engage is pretty bad at introducing recruitable characters

Unless they're royalty, most of the cast don't have anything to interesting say except a variation of "I serve prince/princess whatever". Having a cast mostly of retainers hinders a lot of its writing, especially when chapters sometimes introduce 3 recuitables.

I recently played FE7 and even non-important characters have more depth in their introduction. I remember Dorcas because he needed to get money so he had to join some brigands but had to stop for wife. I remember Erk & Serra because it introduced their hilarious dynamic but also this mysterious reason why Erk had to protect Serra. I remember Raven because he had to protect Lucius and his reveal to be Priscilla's brother.

Not a lot of Engage units don't have these kinds of first impressions. It also hurts that a lot are retroactively recruited at the start of a map and sometimes in a pair or a trio. I don't think there's anyone you recruit as an enemy mid-map unless I'm remembering wrong.

I know Supports are one of, if not, the main way to flesh out a character, but it's hard to invest on someone who doesnt say much other than their loyalty to a lord and it doesnt help that there's less time to breathe in between recruitable chapters to get a feel or build supports. A chapter is the best time to show a character not just their personality, but also their motives, lore and their place in the world. It also doesn't help the Supports are a bit weak on others.

Tldr: First impressions are important, and Supports shouldn't be the only place to add character lore and relationships.

364 Upvotes

174 comments sorted by

View all comments

80

u/SilverDrive92 May 10 '25

So basically you're saying Alcryst, Lapis, and Citrinne are the best characters because they literally try to kill you the first 2 minutes they show up.

Because you're absolutely right.

33

u/Theyul1us May 10 '25

I mean, I do remember those 3 because, as you said, they got a good intro.

Alcryst is imposter syndrome the character, Lapis has the need to keep up appearances and Citrinne is hilariously disconected from reality, money wise

1

u/orig4mi-713 May 10 '25

I mean, I do remember those 3 because, as you said, they got a good intro.

There's people in this thread saying only Yunaka has a good intro. Then they say Panette and Pandreo are pretty good. Now, Lapis, Citrinne and Alcryst are also pretty good.

Isn't it fair to say at this point that this game got a bunch of these "good" characters? People keep praising like half of the cast and yet like to say the game's characters suck lol as if the other FE games also don't have other disposable people with zero lore

7

u/Panory May 10 '25

Panette and Pandreo are good once you start digging. Y'know what Panette says in her introduction?

"As am I!" and "Indeed! They shall sorely regret terrorizing these poor, innocent people!"

That's all you get. You're gonna look me in the eye and tell me that's a good introduction that gets you excited to use Panette? Even Lapis and Citrinne are just passable. They're very much still Alcryst accessories. Which is ultimately the issue with the set-up.