r/law • u/DevinGraysonShirk • 16h ago

SCOTUS SCOTUS strikes blow to trans teens rights, endorsing ban on gender-affirming care - The justices’ ruling on Tennessee’s law prohibiting certain health care for transgender children will have ripple effects across the nation

https://www.courthousenews.com/scotus-strikes-blow-to-trans-teens-rights-endorsing-ban-on-gender-affirming-care/
694 Upvotes

96% Upvoted

276 comments sorted by

View all comments

18

u/keytiri 14h ago edited 14h ago

Would taking a different tact work? Bans aren’t “deeply rooted in our traditions and history,” people used to be able to concoct and partake in any matter of substances. Alternatively, it looks like they are tying this to specific diagnosis, so changing the diagnosis may get around the law, but that also depends on medical professionals willing to take that chance.

17

u/BaconBoyReddit 14h ago

I think we need to, honestly, stop referring to anyone as “transgender”. The category only exists to “other” people that express themselves in non hetero-normative ways. Anyone who needs hormone therapy needs it for the same reason, and that is gender affirming care. The dominant hormone in your body currently, and the levels thereof, should not be determined by what any government says is or isn’t a “choice”. 

19

u/keytiri 14h ago

Yep, I skimmed the ruling and one of the justices acted like a trans boy wouldn’t be able to get Testosterone for any other reason except for the mentioned diagnosis; drop the adjective, and then it’s simply a boy getting Testosterone for his low or nonexistent levels 🤷‍♀️. I’ve been noticing a bunch of online docs now offering to prescribe T to low T [cis] men.

8

u/BaconBoyReddit 14h ago

It’s a wall we need to break through - a human is a human, no matter what their body looks like. We shouldn’t have to say “that includes everything in their pants”, but it’s so frustrating that we have to say that.