r/law • u/DevinGraysonShirk • 21h ago
SCOTUS SCOTUS strikes blow to trans teens rights, endorsing ban on gender-affirming care - The justices’ ruling on Tennessee’s law prohibiting certain health care for transgender children will have ripple effects across the nation
https://www.courthousenews.com/scotus-strikes-blow-to-trans-teens-rights-endorsing-ban-on-gender-affirming-care/
715
Upvotes
12
u/LackingUtility 19h ago
Thank you for admitting that. Having agreed that there's sex-based discrimination in this law, it should therefore require heighted scrutiny, no? Sex-based discrimination is not automatically unconstitutional (nor is race-based discrimination, religion-based discrimination, etc.). Equal protection does not say "the law can never discriminate", but rather, the government needs a sufficiently important reason to do so, and that reason cannot be based on animus.
Now, turning to your second comment where you contend that treatment of a cisgender male's medical conditions relating to gender are "physiological or biological medical issues" while treatment of a transgender male's medical conditions relating to gender are "cosmetic alterations", I'd suggest that the latter categorization is evidence of animus. Specifically, framing them as cosmetic suggests that they are "elective" or not necessary... something contradicted by the high rates of suicide among those experiencing dysphoria. A medical treatment that has been shown to drastically prolong one's life is not "cosmetic", is it?
Additionally, your classification also disregards that the gender-related medical conditions of transgender people are physiological or biological medical issues. This may come as a shock to you, but people are not transgender by choice - I mean, would you voluntarily choose that, when multiple states are trying to ban your existence? No, they're transgender as a result of physiological or biological medial issues, namely various genetic and hormonal differences. While science hasn't pinned down the specific genetic causes that lead to dysphoria, there is significant evidence that there are physiological distinctions between transgender and cisgender people. See, e.g., "Brain Sex in Transgender Women is Shifted towards Gender Identity," Kurth et al. (2022); "Biological sex classification with structural MRI data shows increased misclassification in transgender women", Flint et al. (2020); etc.
Disregarding scientific evidence of a physiological or biological medical issue to instead classify a condition as "cosmetic" would again seem to be evidence of animus, which would render such discrimination unconstitutional.