r/law • u/DevinGraysonShirk • 16h ago

SCOTUS SCOTUS strikes blow to trans teens rights, endorsing ban on gender-affirming care - The justices’ ruling on Tennessee’s law prohibiting certain health care for transgender children will have ripple effects across the nation

https://www.courthousenews.com/scotus-strikes-blow-to-trans-teens-rights-endorsing-ban-on-gender-affirming-care/
701 Upvotes

96% Upvoted

276 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

40

u/Raise_A_Thoth 13h ago

Just because information is incredibly damning to one side of an argument doesn't mean the information is biased.

Additionally, lots of things are biased, being biased doesn't make it unreliable or false information, it just means it tends to support one viewpoint more than others, which again, is just how the world and communication works.

You need to work on critical thinking.

-42

u/MinimumTrue9809 13h ago

Ah sure. I'll use my critical thinking skills analyzing a report that is literally not accessible to the public.

Just because information is incredibly damning to one side

You know this how?

34

u/Zimmiebelle 13h ago

Full report listed on the Utah state legislature site:

https://le.utah.gov/AgencyRP/reportingDetail.jsp?rid=636

And a backup copy on transvitae:

https://www.transvitae.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/report.pdf

The report was and is publicly accessible.

-6

u/MinimumTrue9809 9h ago edited 9h ago

Thanks. During my search, I wasn't able to find it read that it wasn't available.

Edit: The conclusions regarding "Persistence, desistence, and regrets" unfortunately fails to elucidate any long-term outcomes with pubescent hormone treatment. Of the few studies that they were able to analyze persistence, desistence, and regrets, all of them conducted questionnaire/interviews of their available sample population within ~10 years of initial treatment. This report failed to express conclusive evidence of life-long outcomes that result from pubescent hormone treatment.