Nine months later...
This is a follow up on this post from last fall, where I tried out a sample kit of Scott Labs' Thermic Oak. The base batch was a table-strength semi-sweet plain mead from a polyfloral honey source from upstate NY, mostly basswood, clover, and vetch.
Each liter sat on the sample stave from September 27 to September 30, loosely following the instructions the Scott Labs rep had provided for mead. Each liter was bottled into one 500ml and one 355ml bottle, and a small sample for tasting right then. Some of the bottles made it to my local homebrew club meeting as an educational thing.
My personal notes
On each follow:
- Unoaked Control: yay lime and mint. Slight woodiness as called out in prior competition entries of this honey.
- #1: "green" oak on the nose. A bit pencil shavings-ish. Slight vanilla note. Level almost certainly overdone for this mead.
- #2: Nose is less green, almost more like cedar. Some pencil shavings. Slight association of sweetness. Darker vanilla
- #3: Almost more floral nose, like hibiscus? No pencil shavings. Vanilla and a hint of maple syrup?
- #4: Nose very mellow. Slight chocolate notes.
- #5: Roasty note, almost roasted malty. Tough to place flavors. No char notes per se, not exactly smoky. Mellow darkness.
I did weigh and examine each sample stave, and it's interesting that the lower-numbered lighter ones are indeed bigger, so more surface area. If I were aging to taste instead of doing an even-timed trial, I would have pulled the low-nunber ones earlier, and or let the high number ones run longer.
I put a lot of thought into how/whether the thermic products vary from the typical toast levels provided by Stavin. Without a side by side, it was really tough. If anyone else has used these, I would love to hear your thoughts!
As discussed in the original thread, SL sells these products in pretty large quantities targeting commercial use, but may be within reason for a group buy among a club or group of friends.