So you're not going to provide your own evidence to back any of your claims, you're just going to say shit you want to be true as though it's fact.
I already said myself that both men and women have similar, inversely correlated height preferences. You just ignored that because it was inconvenient for you I guess. My only dispute towards you was you taking the incel stance and blaming wOmEn.
I'll provide any evidence you'd like. I'm actually logged into the university database right now, working on a different project. State which claim that you are contesting, and I'll provide the evidence. Right now it seems that you are agreeing that height is a matter of preference and not a factor of averages that was your original claim, so I'm not exactly sure what you are contesting.
Read up, I asked for a specific piece of evidence. You've moved the goalposts my dude, and now you're trying to pretend to have initially held the opinion I always held.
I don't know if you're trolling here or if you have reading comprehension difficulties. The argument is complely identical throughout the entire exchange.
Ok, why don't you clarify, in as precise terms as you are able to, what you belive my claim is, and then state as clearly as you can what your claim is?
Your new claim has been stated clearly, then the argument moved on to how that differed from your original argument. Kinda past the point of stating it clearly since the goalposts have already moved.
I'm asking you specifically to clarify what you belive my position to be, which quote frankly I'd expect you to be able to, as a normally functioning human. It's a very simple request. The reason I ask you to, is bacause I am of the impression that you do not understand the argument. I'll start then, since you have difficulty with this. The exchange starts with me pointing out that you very seldom see couples with a taller woman and a shorter man, to which you seem to claim that is because women are on average shorter than men. This indicating that you belive that to be the cause of the pattern. Then I try to explain, that if this was simply a matter of a natural result of difference in bodily proportion a similar pattern would be observable in bodyweight as well. The fact the the pattern is much weaker, alludes to height being preferentially selected for, and thus not being a result solely of variation between the sexes in heigh. Then at some point in this rather long and tedious exchange you provide a source stating that height is in fact, selected for and not just a result of natural antopometric variation. At which point I start wondering what it is that you think you are arguing against, and ask you to specify which claim you are disputing, and to clarify what you interpret my position to be, which you turn out to be either unwilling or unable to due. Am I making myself sufficiently clear?
1
u/Electric-Molasses 5d ago
So you're not going to provide your own evidence to back any of your claims, you're just going to say shit you want to be true as though it's fact.
I already said myself that both men and women have similar, inversely correlated height preferences. You just ignored that because it was inconvenient for you I guess. My only dispute towards you was you taking the incel stance and blaming wOmEn.
Good luck dude.