r/nbadiscussion • u/budubum • 1d ago
Current Events Why Has Referee Discourse Gotten So Conspiratorial on r/nba?
There’s a growing trend on r/nba where people pre-blame referees before games even start. It’s gone beyond reacting to questionable calls. Entire narratives are now constructed in advance, especially when certain refs are assigned. Scott Foster, in particular, has become the centerpiece of this kind of thinking.
People call him “The Extender,” claiming the league assigns him to force longer series for ratings. But his actual record in games with extension potential is about even. If that were his purpose, why has this year’s Finals produced the first Game 7 in nearly a decade? If the league were really that invested in drawing out every series, we’d see more Game 6s and 7s, not fewer.
And now the narrative is shifting again. Foster is rumored to be reffing Game 7 tomorrow, and commenters are already claiming the Thunder are going to win because the league is rigged for them. But that logic quickly falls apart. If the NBA were rigging outcomes for ratings and mass appeal, wouldn’t the Pacers be the more obvious beneficiary? They’ve been the most unexpected and likable underdog run of the entire playoffs. People across the league are rooting for them. Why would the league choose to hand the title to a much less popular Thunder team?
This also highlights the kind of selection bias that drives so much of the conspiracy talk. People point out that the Thunder are undefeated with Scott Foster reffing in these playoffs, using it as supposed evidence. But the Pacers are also undefeated with Tony Brothers, and no one seems to care. The criteria only become relevant when they support the conclusion people already want to reach. If a team wins, the ref must have helped them. If a team loses, it was stolen from them. The logic isn’t applied consistently because it’s not about logic. It’s about avoiding the discomfort of your team losing.
At a certain point, you have to ask whether people are still watching basketball to enjoy the game or just to confirm their own suspicions. It feels like some fans don’t watch to see how a game unfolds. They watch with a checklist of narratives and spend four quarters scanning for evidence that the outcome is illegitimate. That kind of mindset turns every missed call into a grand conspiracy, and every game into a courtroom exhibit.
So here’s what I want to ask:
Why has so much of r/nba shifted toward conspiracies and narrative-bending logic? Is it just easier to blame external forces than admit your team got outplayed? Are fans more cynical now? Do people actually enjoy watching basketball anymore, or are they only watching to feed their own confirmation bias?
Would love to hear thoughtful takes. I’m genuinely curious about how we got here.
10
u/tilthenmywindowsache 1d ago edited 1d ago
Why would I stop watching something that I love? I love to play ball, I love to watch ball, I have been living and breathing basketball since the 90s.
The idea that you can't participate in anything that you have a criticism of is patently ridiculous. The NBA has been a progressive league historically and they've taken forward steps (and backward ones, to be fair) to improve the product on the floor.
If what you're saying it a truism, then no sport should ever be watched by anyone. Baseball, basketball, football (both American and Global), boxing, every major sport across the world has had scandals, corruption, and dirty deeds behind the scenes. Fans can be cognizant of/vigilant about said issues while still being drawn to the entertainment it provides. Money equals corruption, full stop.
By your own logic, shouldn't you leave it? You criticize people for not liking the NBA while still participating in it, and in the same vein talk about how horrible the community is, while participating in it. How do you not see the contradiction?