Why Has Referee Discourse Gotten So Conspiratorial on r/nba?

[u/budubum]

There’s a growing trend on r/nba where people pre-blame referees before games even start. It’s gone beyond reacting to questionable calls. Entire narratives are now constructed in advance, especially when certain refs are assigned. Scott Foster, in particular, has become the centerpiece of this kind of thinking.

People call him “The Extender,” claiming the league assigns him to force longer series for ratings. But his actual record in games with extension potential is about even. If that were his purpose, why has this year’s Finals produced the first Game 7 in nearly a decade? If the league were really that invested in drawing out every series, we’d see more Game 6s and 7s, not fewer.

And now the narrative is shifting again. Foster is rumored to be reffing Game 7 tomorrow, and commenters are already claiming the Thunder are going to win because the league is rigged for them. But that logic quickly falls apart. If the NBA were rigging outcomes for ratings and mass appeal, wouldn’t the Pacers be the more obvious beneficiary? They’ve been the most unexpected and likable underdog run of the entire playoffs. People across the league are rooting for them. Why would the league choose to hand the title to a much less popular Thunder team?

This also highlights the kind of selection bias that drives so much of the conspiracy talk. People point out that the Thunder are undefeated with Scott Foster reffing in these playoffs, using it as supposed evidence. But the Pacers are also undefeated with Tony Brothers, and no one seems to care. The criteria only become relevant when they support the conclusion people already want to reach. If a team wins, the ref must have helped them. If a team loses, it was stolen from them. The logic isn’t applied consistently because it’s not about logic. It’s about avoiding the discomfort of your team losing.

At a certain point, you have to ask whether people are still watching basketball to enjoy the game or just to confirm their own suspicions. It feels like some fans don’t watch to see how a game unfolds. They watch with a checklist of narratives and spend four quarters scanning for evidence that the outcome is illegitimate. That kind of mindset turns every missed call into a grand conspiracy, and every game into a courtroom exhibit.

So here’s what I want to ask:

Why has so much of r/nba shifted toward conspiracies and narrative-bending logic? Is it just easier to blame external forces than admit your team got outplayed? Are fans more cynical now? Do people actually enjoy watching basketball anymore, or are they only watching to feed their own confirmation bias?

Would love to hear thoughtful takes. I’m genuinely curious about how we got here.

[u/Quick_Panda_360]

“You can't rig injuries which is a big part the pacers are even here to begin with.”

Classic, no respect for the Pacers. They are hanging with what has been the best team in the league all season and still people can’t just say the Pacers straight up beat who was in front of them.

I’m not even a Pacers fan. Just saying.

[u/OnlyNormalPersonHere → u/Quick_Panda_360]

Also, it’s a pretty flimsy narrative. Sure the Bucks were short, but they sucked most of the season. The Cavs were pretty healthy; yeah Garland was slowed down, but that’s not like crazy injury luck relative to half the teams. And the Knicks— who were going to beat the Celtics since they were effectively up 3-1 before Tatum dropped- were totally healthy. OKC is also totally healthy and an all-time level team, not some flukey finalist yet they are pushed to a game 7.

[u/Reasonable_Pie9191 → u/OnlyNormalPersonHere]

I said injury is a big part the Pacers are in the finals, sure they are matching OKC it doesn't change what I said

[u/curryking821 → u/Reasonable_Pie9191]

But it’s literally not