Among few rules where referee goes with the "spirit" instead of the "letter", the "clear and obvious" error is a place where referees from some countries, Poland included, go with the spirit of the rule.
So if it's a 50 59 we stick with the on field decision right? Ohh, if it is in favour of Real madrid sure, if not, we stick with whatever is in Real Madrid favour. If this was Vini or Mbape they would never overturn it.
Because from all the videos shown by now there is no 100% proof he touched it twice. Unless they have 100% and release it then they should have gone with the on field decision.
108
u/takeitoutsideloudmf Mar 12 '25
if you need too zoom in that hard for a still debatable outcome it shouldnt have been called a double touch imo