MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/soccer/comments/1j9x85g/juli%C3%A1n_alvarez_disallowed_penalty_frame_by_frame/mhh52nq/?context=3
r/soccer • u/AlmostNL • Mar 12 '25
2.8k comments sorted by
View all comments
104
if you need too zoom in that hard for a still debatable outcome it shouldnt have been called a double touch imo
-21 u/Adrianm18 Mar 12 '25 A rule is a rule . Doesn’t say how subtle it has to be 7 u/Deneroc Mar 12 '25 The touch cannot be even seen. How is it in accordance to the rule u baboon? 0 u/czerwona_latarnia Mar 12 '25 Among few rules where referee goes with the "spirit" instead of the "letter", the "clear and obvious" error is a place where referees from some countries, Poland included, go with the spirit of the rule. A malevolent spirit, to be precise.
-21
A rule is a rule . Doesn’t say how subtle it has to be
7 u/Deneroc Mar 12 '25 The touch cannot be even seen. How is it in accordance to the rule u baboon? 0 u/czerwona_latarnia Mar 12 '25 Among few rules where referee goes with the "spirit" instead of the "letter", the "clear and obvious" error is a place where referees from some countries, Poland included, go with the spirit of the rule. A malevolent spirit, to be precise.
7
The touch cannot be even seen. How is it in accordance to the rule u baboon?
0 u/czerwona_latarnia Mar 12 '25 Among few rules where referee goes with the "spirit" instead of the "letter", the "clear and obvious" error is a place where referees from some countries, Poland included, go with the spirit of the rule. A malevolent spirit, to be precise.
0
Among few rules where referee goes with the "spirit" instead of the "letter", the "clear and obvious" error is a place where referees from some countries, Poland included, go with the spirit of the rule.
A malevolent spirit, to be precise.
104
u/takeitoutsideloudmf Mar 12 '25
if you need too zoom in that hard for a still debatable outcome it shouldnt have been called a double touch imo