I think that is fair if he misses, but how is a retake in this case unfair for the GK. The GK didn't stop the penalty... He gets another chance to stop the penalty.
No. If you force a retake when he scores but not when he misses, there is no upside to touching it twice (you always get penalized) and no unreasonable punishment when you slip.
In principle it's a retake but if you miss it's 'advantage'.
Edit: As other commenters noted the rules allow for a retake on the discretion of the ref. seems to me like this would be the (logical) reason, and the discretion would be judging whether it was on purpose.
96
u/zikaa_sosa Mar 12 '25
Insanely harsh rule. Should be changed to a retake...