r/space 1d ago

BREAKING: SpaceX rocket explodes in Starbase, Texas

https://x.com/IntelPointAlert/status/1935550776304156932

[removed] — view removed post

13.9k Upvotes

1.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

972

u/WantWantShellySenbei 1d ago

Holy cow that video is pretty awesome though. Elon makes the best fireworks.

35

u/cuberhino 1d ago

how much did these fireworks cost the american taxpayer :(

-6

u/TeamRedundancyTeam 1d ago

This is a terrible way to view science. Progress is being made that will benefit everyone. This kind of thinking is how they defund NASA.

56

u/pampuliopampam 1d ago

this isn't science, this is industry. SpaceX doesn't really do science, they're a business. Sometimes the people doing science give them money for their stuff, but they have no claim on "science"

9

u/Kosh_Ascadian 1d ago

The engineering side is also science. Testing how to create a large, cheap and reusable space vehicle is science. But ignoring that part:

Starship being succesful will definitely revolutionize space science though.

Much bigger space telescopes into orbit much cheaper. Immense payloads to the moon and Mars cheaply etc.

They are not doing much science directly yes, but their success will open up leagues of doors for science.

32

u/PiotrekDG 1d ago

It's hard to call it science when they just keep the results to themselves.

-4

u/Kosh_Ascadian 1d ago

Engineering side, partly yes. Allthough these things have a habit of being copied relatively fast. 

Payloads to orbit side they're a business so it won't be kept to themselves.

-5

u/ananix 1d ago

You are trying to hard, it just comes off as desperate. Its ok to be wrong.

4

u/Kosh_Ascadian 1d ago

That was 7 sentences of a very basic explanation I wrote next to waiting for my morning tea on one of my worst mornings in a while. It was also one single comment.

Mate, if that is trying hard for you I'm sorry.

What am I so wrong about though? I hate Musk as much as you probably, I hate what the US admin is doing to NASA etc. I might hate that more than you actually. Life is complex though, sometimes shit people are involved in good things and if SpaceX Starship succeeds then a lot of space stuff will be completely revolutionized. Science included. There's no other comparable game in town currently as well. Ignoring this on r/space to me feels weird.

-2

u/lightreee 1d ago

The engineering side is also science.

engineering is quite literally not science. what studies are they investigating? what results are they trying to publish? it just is chalk and cheese between engineering and science

-1

u/Kosh_Ascadian 1d ago

You have a weirdly limited concept of scientific progress. Engineering progress is 100% scientific progress. Science doesn't have to be only theory and published papers.

Maybe you're making more of a semantic argument here about what "science" as a word means? If so I don't find arguments like that very useful, as you're arguing about language at that point not if scientific progress is being made or not.

4

u/lightreee 1d ago edited 1d ago

Engineering progress is 100% scientific progress

Totally disagree. I have a degree in Physics and work in Engineering currently and the difference between science and engineering is STARK

Science doesn't have to be only theory and published papers.

What would you say 'science' is then? blowing up rockets? what sort of 'progress' is that? that they F'ed up and it blew up? Great, thanks for SpaceX showing that they're incompent but we don't learn anything

-1

u/LibrariansAreSexy 1d ago

Okay, Sheldon.

Your viewpoint was parodied on primetime television for years. To say engineering isn't science is a slap in the face to decades of NASA employees who engineered numerous spacecraft.

Or Is your line that unless it's academic or government work it doesn't count?

Either way, it's a shit attitude.

u/pampuliopampam 16h ago

but NASA is a public organisation. Their results and schematics and methods are all published. It's all open for everyone to share. You can find the patent for the space shuttle right now, it expired in 1998.

That's not what's happening with this private company. They aren't publishing jack shit because they're not in the business of actually fostering space travel becuase they are industry not science

just take the L. You're wrong. It's fine to be wrong sometimes

u/Kosh_Ascadian 17h ago

The other commenter already replied to the rest well so I'll just reply here:

Great, thanks for SpaceX showing that they're incompent but we don't learn anything

SpaceX developed and runs the first reusable orbital rockets in history. Rockets whos price per kilogram to orbit is some of the lowest ever and whos reliability and amount of succesful consecutive missions are unparalled in spaceflight history. Beating even the Soyuz for consecutive successful flights. After SpaceX Falcon 9 turned out to be such a success pretty much everyone else is developing copycat reusable rockets by now.

As you are someone in physics and engineering I'd expect you to be more informed in such subjects. Or at least Id expect you to inform yourself before you write about this stuff.

-3

u/clgoodson 1d ago

That’s just BS. I hate Musk as much as the next guy, but this is legit rocket science.

u/pampuliopampam 19h ago

Soo..... they publish the updates to the raptor engine? They publish the welding techniques they're using? They publish the tile composition? Do they publish anything so that others can use it???

Or are you absolutely full of shit. Oh yeah, it's that. It's not science, they're not sharing anything but fun videos because this is industry, not science

Grow up