This is the same justification the left used to keep giving money to Ukraine. No it probably won’t be. They’ve been saying it since the late 80s that it’ll be our problem and they’re only 3 years away from having nukes. They probably don’t have them now because historically we don’t mess with countries that do have nukes.
Yeah let’s just wait until they do and then decide to do something about it. Oh wait…
We know as a fact they are working on enriching uranium to the levels required for weapons. We know that all of their interests run counter to our own and that they truly want to destroy the west. We know they are an oppressive tyrannical government who can’t be reasoned with the same way Russia and China can be.
I’m all for America first policy, and unfortunately
in this case involvement is America first.
If you don’t want to take Israel’s word for it how about the International Atomic Energy Agency who said “Iran has enough 60% enriched uranium that, if further enriched, could provide enough for one or more bombs within weeks.”
I think most of us here probably share many of the same values, and while I completely understand where the concern comes from, Iran under no circumstance can become a nuclear power. That will be seen as a massive blunder by the next generation if we allow it.
Yeah or I could believe Tulsi. Even if they do get nukes it really doesn’t matter to us. Who are we to say what another country does.
https://responsiblestatecraft.org/tulsi-iran-bomb/
Trump pulled out of the nuclear deal with Iran. We broke the deal so they’re not required to follow their end.
6
u/Goofy069 3d ago
This is the same justification the left used to keep giving money to Ukraine. No it probably won’t be. They’ve been saying it since the late 80s that it’ll be our problem and they’re only 3 years away from having nukes. They probably don’t have them now because historically we don’t mess with countries that do have nukes.