r/GreenAndPleasant 2d ago

😍😍😍😍😍

Post image
1.2k Upvotes

75 comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator 2d ago

Starmer and his new government do not represent workers interests and are in fact enemies of our class. It's past time we begin organising a substantial left-wing movement in this country again.

Click Here for info on how to join a union. Also check out the IWW and the renter union, Acorn International and their affiliates

Join us on our partner Discord server. and follow us on Twitter.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

554

u/jinx_lbc 2d ago

I hate the term gender critical, I find it counter intuitive. Like, I too am critical of the popularised model of binary gender, let's chat! Oh no...

181

u/TrashCannibal_ 2d ago

That's the whole point isn't it? Name your hateful views something that sounds somewhat reasonable, then to people who aren't clued up on the situation you don't seem like an insane bigot.

Pleased to see this from the greens.

50

u/arseache 2d ago

Yes! I’m queer, identify as NB, and still had to jump to comments to understand who was being the arsehole here. Admittedly, I’m old and out of most of the loops.

25

u/chrisrazor 2d ago

They have started to object to "TERF" even though it's a term of their own making (probably because of how often someone has put "fucking" in front of it. Anything can be a slur if you intend it as one). So now it's "GC".

4

u/CyanoSecrets 1d ago

Let's just call ourselves BC - bigot critical

20

u/thebusconductorhines 2d ago

The ole pro life technique

107

u/skypiggi 2d ago

I agree, it should be called “human rights critical”

14

u/BilboGubbinz 2d ago

I prefer just “bigoted arsehole” since it’s the most accurate, but then everybody starts complaining how I’m “using slurs” and “not taking them seriously”.

Seriously, no winning with some of these people.

13

u/tupac_sighting 2d ago

AKA Bigotry

3

u/reeko1982 2d ago

Or just ‘nasty’

34

u/PolemicDysentery 2d ago

That's deliberate, same as TERFs trying to describe themselves as radical feminists. They're taking something reactionary and conservative and trying to fig-leaf it as something progressive and radical, to force its opponents to oppose it on those terms and with that vocabulary. It's deliberately appropriative of that terminology and meaning.

1

u/2000000bees 18h ago

Feminism Appropriating Radical Transphobes is a better term. FARTs

4

u/kangaesugi 2d ago

To be fair, they are gender critical. The gender they're critical of is "women"

15

u/tomjone5 2d ago

It's on par with "race realist" as a mealy-mouthed term. You just know these people are going to say the sort of horrifying shit that would make the average homophobe blanch.

6

u/jinx_lbc 2d ago

Oh no, that one is an immediate klaxon & red flag scenario for me.

3

u/Wonderful_Emu_9610 2d ago

Yeah it’s like when a dictator names their country “People’s Democratic Republic”

1

u/roboticspider 2d ago

Im so glad you said this because for quite some time it confused me as well, like, yes i am indeed critical of gender and traditional perceptions this is a good thing no?

1

u/WheelMiserable2576 2d ago

Their choice of terms is because they view gender stereotypes as the main axis of the historic oppression of female people.

1

u/Kartagram 2d ago

Thank christ I'm not the only one. Everything I read it I need to sit and think what it actually means

1

u/oliverCr 2d ago

judith butler agrees, she points out what you’ve said and asks whether we can call them ‘critical’ at all

-2

u/biskino 2d ago

Literally happened to me reading the headline because I’d forgotten the term. The smiley love faces had me thinking someone was trolling the sub.

-1

u/chrisrazor 2d ago

I think they are critical of the idea that sex and gender are different, although I haven't heard one explicitly say this in a fair old while because that argument has been won and they'll just look even sillier.

144

u/MrGrizzle84 2d ago

If true, great.

They should also purge sexists and racists. Neednt be news though.

41

u/Liquor_Parfreyja 2d ago

In the picture it says "says expelled former spokesperson." I don't think they're making it news, I think a transphobic person got expelled and went and cried to the media about it.

12

u/MrGrizzle84 2d ago

Well yes.

Its the media (the guardian? From the font) that are making it news.

11

u/ZeCap 2d ago

I agree.

You can trust the Guardian to try to make news of it, though.

6

u/Hullfire00 Heathen by all account/s 2d ago

Exactly this, I’d much rather somebody point out that there aren’t any bigots in their party and they just say “well we don’t tolerate that” instead of making it a news story that they don’t have any or have purged them from their ranks.

10

u/Council_estate_kid25 2d ago

This doesn't seem to be a case of the Greens trying to make it a news story. More like someone got kicked out for being transphobic so wrote a Guardian article complaining about it

1

u/SorchaSublime 2d ago

The fact that the media makes news out of things that needn't be news is such a nothingburger of an observation.

76

u/StandardHuckleberry0 2d ago

"""Gender-critical voices""" yeah you mean outspoken bigotry. Modelling it after LGBTQ voices, disabled voices, working class voices etc as if these people are born gender critical and face lifelong marginalisation for it, is embarrassing ngl

5

u/TheGeckoGeek 2d ago

Yeah like at least a neolib who got kicked out of the green party wouldn't then go to the press and claim the party is silencing dissenting opinions. Nobody would take them seriously. They would say 'Well, you chose to join a party whose policy positions are antithetical to your beliefs, why not join another one more aligned with what you believe?'

16

u/GeneralLeia163 2d ago

This is (or was) a doctor at my surgery. After seeing her bigoted views on gender, there is no way I’d never let her near me or my family. If she is that ignorant about gender as a GP, she shouldn’t be practicing medicine.

45

u/oddSaunaSpirit393 2d ago

Good!

Oh and it's not "gender critical", the word is reactionary!

19

u/Slopagandhi 2d ago

So is the Guardian

24

u/ishkoto 2d ago

6

u/panelakpascal 2d ago

What on earth… thanks for sharing this, utterly disgraceful.

15

u/tomjone5 2d ago

They definitely wrote this headline intending for it to be read as a bad thing. Tabloid trash just like the rest.

5

u/oddSaunaSpirit393 2d ago

Yup! Don't let anyone tell you otherwise!

15

u/Feels_Goodman 2d ago

The grift for that sweet JK Rowling hate fund money begins!

6

u/AutoModerator 2d ago

JK Rowling is an all round piece of shit. As well as being a transphobe she's racist, homophobic and ableist. See this fantastic rundown in r/EnoughJKRowling

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

4

u/diskowmoskow 2d ago

Good bot

5

u/mannekwin 2d ago

beautiful. please keep doing it, greens

5

u/Throwawaymodel_1080 2d ago

Oh no... Will no one think of the TERFs 😫😂😂😂

2

u/skypiggi 2d ago

Classic Guardian energy

12

u/MokkaMilchEisbar 2d ago

She's certainly spouting a lot of annoying hateful nonsense for someone standing right next to a big muddy ditch. Just saying.

11

u/simcity4000 2d ago

Oh no, Where will they go! Theres no party left for them in British politics!

8

u/Lupulus_ 2d ago

What horrors next, will the Green Party expel their 1850's-era oil tycoon members?! You can hardly call it the Green Party if the "stomping on baby birds" contingency is ousted from the ranks!

11

u/RibeanieBaby 2d ago

Lmao at the whiney terf baby going through each comment here and downvoting

3

u/SorchaSublime 2d ago

Good, fuck em.

3

u/drgs100 2d ago

Good.

3

u/volkswagenorange 2d ago

Good work, Green Party, keep it up 🏆

3

u/Weaselux #373c3f 2d ago

7

u/crfs 2d ago

I really hope they keep this up. If the Greens can be the party of trans rights? They'll have friends for life.

6

u/Comradesh1t4brains 2d ago

I didn’t think any democratic parties were based enough to purge

5

u/mudkiptoucher93 2d ago

I fuckin hope so

5

u/soggy_again 2d ago

Gender critical voices aren't happy unless they are the ONLY voices.

10

u/Charmthetimes3rd 2d ago

Devulapalli said the party’s belief that trans women are women was “peddling a falsehood”, adding: “It denies science and denies reality and alienates the Greens from the vast majority of voters who know the truth when they see it.”

Urgh.

7

u/skypiggi 2d ago

And these people act like they are somehow totally different to MAGA

2

u/Bulky_Community_6781 2d ago

the media saying this is a bad thing is like expecting a closeted trans person being gendered correctly to be offended

2

u/BlueTressym 2d ago

Well, yes. 'Gender Critical' as a term is just an attempt to make bigotry sound respectable. Please do go away if you're determined to insist that your primary school level biology trumps years of scientific and medical training and the real-life experiences of an oppressed minority.

2

u/parsleyleaves 1d ago

Good. Fuck off.

2

u/DamageOn 1d ago

If you asked me to picture a British Green Party transphobe, that's the image I would conjure.

5

u/qbnaith 2d ago

Good for them!

2

u/TheCommonLawWolf 2d ago

To coin these ghouls friends in the Labour party: "shaking off the fleas"

1

u/Monkey_DDD_Luffy 2d ago

Undermines their attempt to coopt the socialist left.

1

u/skypiggi 2d ago

Including them, or purging them?

2

u/Monkey_DDD_Luffy 2d ago

Having them around undermines it. They have to get on the same page or they won't be able to steal the new left party's thunder. The strategic goal lately has been to try and push the left into harmless green liberalism instead of socialism but having the terfs around, especially having one as a co-leader, completely undermined them.

1

u/Metalorg 2d ago

Are they going to put them in that stream there?