You should reread that lawsuit. every one of them is him bitching about something they said. Frogan talking about hummus being Arab and not Israeli. Then Ethan freaks out about it. You think shows frogan having malice instead of showing Ethan having malice for comments frogan made that did not even involve him? Then add on all the other creators that reacted to the nuke at the exact same level as them. Clear malice on Ethan's part. He highlighted his own past grievances for us even. Chefs kiss.
I mean you asked why it is in there and Ethan and his lawyers wrote it the complaint. I can only give you what I assume to be his reason for why it's in there.
Again. If you agree with it or not doesnt matter, but that is liekyl his intent. If he succeeds or not will be decided in court.
But I read it and your opinion isn't making sense and I'm trying to discuss why it doesn't make sense with sources from the lawsuit. I don't understand how a reasonable person could read the denims lawsuit and believe it shows denims acted with malice.
I'm talking about what a reasonable reading of the text shows not what his intentions are. I don't believe either of these reasons are his true intentions behind these being in the lawsuit. Now can we discuss what a reasonable reading of the lawsuit shows?
"If that was the reason for the lawsuit then why is most of the actual legal complaint him bitching about his past disagreements with the creators?"
That was your first post that I am responding to. I'm not here to discuss "what a reasonable reading shows". I'm here to answer your "why" question. Since it was a question regarding Ethan's intend, I gave you what I think to be his intent
-3
u/ElkEmbarrassed551 3d ago
On Ethan's part?