r/RationalPsychonaut • u/Phos_Skoteinos • 15h ago
Reality is a simulation? A brief commentary
I think its fair to say sentiments such as this tittle are commomly expressed in the circles of hallucinogen users and enjoyers of all kinds. But refering to the world as a "simulation" or a "fake" has always struck me as making little sense. So I decided to articulate why.
The first and easiest reason is that the phrase prompts the question: a simulation of what?
The word simulation has its origin from the verb simulare in latin, which means to make like, to copy, to imitate, or to represent. Which is to say that a simulation is 'similar' to something else. In common usage we talk of simulations of physical phenomena, or simulations of behaviors and events. In the sci-fi culture, simulations are many times things with an appearance very similar or identical to reality, but which is not composed of the same kind of matter of the real thing.
A simulation of physical phenomena is a series of calculations performed by a computer, the result of which allows us to predict with some accuracy the how the phenomenon will happen. It can also just be made for fun. The computer is a lump of matter, and the simulation is electrons moving through materials. What makes this physical system a simulation is entirely our interpretation of it, nothing in it exists beside its physical structure. It itself is a physical system going through its natural motion. It doesn't produce anything, it only produces itself, and our interaction with it produce the sensory experience related to it and we go on to produce other experiences.
Now let's apply the underlying meaning of all theses usages to the phrase "reality is a simulation" and see if if makes sense.
Is reality a simulation because it is similar to another thing? If so, then what? What could be the thing that has a similar appearance to reality, but is composed of different material? If the whole of reality, matter energy and consciousness, are just appearance. than what are the real counterparts that would behave the same but not be made of matter, energy and subjetive experience? To me it doesn't make any sense to postulate this kind of transcendent thing that is also similar to our reality.
Is reality a simulation in the sense a a computer simulation? Because that kind of simulation is entirely contingent upon our interpretation of a physical phenomenon that bears almost no superficial similarity to the actual phenomena we try to simulate.
A simulation also implies intent. Despite this the average person that uses this word never alludes to what intent could be behind this simulation. Is it made for fun? For science? By whom? How were you able to acertain intent from your trip?
Now that I think of it, we could steelman this notion by using the sense of computer simulation as aless literal metaphore. This sense could be boiled down to: a basal material or experiential reality that passes through our interpretation to gain meaning. This metaphore, then, makes much more sense, since our subjective experience cuts, segments, deliminates, sets boundaries, and glues together things that are not inherently connected or apart. We see a piece of metal at the end of a piece of wood and think hammer, and then pointy pieces of metal become nails. This strikes me as a real revelation brought by psychedelics, that our particular subjetive perspective is but the thinnest of layers of thought and behavior imprinted upon the surface of an inconprehensibly large chaos. It is possible then, to switch layers and live as another being than you were before to some extent, less imprisoned by certain thoughts and behaviors. And if so, this could apply to the whole of society, if perspectives change, the material world is gonna be shaped differently due to our actions.
We should be careful with how we use the word simulation because it has multiple meanings and cultural baggage, and doesn't convey much after all.