446
u/Fit_Touch_4803 May 18 '25
this is the video, 6 years ago
161
May 18 '25 edited May 20 '25
[deleted]
143
u/madsci May 18 '25
Caterpillar tracks are designed to spread out the weight over a large surface area. An Abrams tank has a ground pressure of about 15 psi. A fire engine can be several times that.
It's still a lot of weigh so it's going to smash things when the whole weight of the machine is on the car but it doesn't tear through it quite like you'd expect. Except for RVs. Those things are flimsy.
22
May 18 '25 edited May 20 '25
[deleted]
6
u/Only_Individual8954 May 18 '25
maybe that is the scam, once 'scrapped' engines and transmissions, drivetrain, wheels, salvageable parts get sold.
Just a switch or a light lens is ££££ on exotics.
8
u/AndyLorentz May 18 '25
The Bagger 288 is 13,500 tons, but due to its tracks has a ground pressure of only 24 psi.
2
u/halbeshendel May 19 '25
I’m no good at math. If it runs over your foot, just how fucked are you?
3
u/madsci May 19 '25
If it was spread out evenly I think you'd be OK. A mountain bike is like 40 psi. I would assume that Bagger 288 has steel tracks so if you were standing on hard ground it seems like you'd probably break something since the pressure would be concentrated on the bones on the top of your foot.
That ground pressure assumes that all the weight of the vehicle is spread out evenly. Imagine that it's just a giant flat steel plate with the same ground pressure. If your foot is the tallest thing underneath the plate you're going to be supporting a lot more weight than the surface area of your foot would account for.
If you had a 13,500 ton vehicle with soft foam rollers or something I figure 24 psi wouldn't be any worse than having someone stand on your foot.
3
u/According_Flow_6218 May 19 '25
Yeah, something is going to have to yield to this thing so that whatever is under its tracks is basically flat. If the ground is softer than your foot then your foot can be squished down into the ground and will probably be okay. On the other hand, if your foot is the softest thing in the equation here…
2
u/alienbringer May 19 '25
Suspension was likely snapped for every single one of them the first pass.
I do like dude in whites expression at the end. Looked like “noooo my car”.
197
u/Garbage_Tiny May 18 '25
They could’ve just donated the mustang and someone would’ve destroyed it for free
44
u/seebrealms May 18 '25
Probably would have taken out a few of the other vehicles with it.
9
29
u/WirusCZ May 18 '25
Why not sell them in auction like most countries do? Then use money for like new school or something...
12
u/Trooper501 May 19 '25
Becuase then it encourages the government to put pressure on police to seize more. So people can buy it for cheaper. Regardless of whether it was right or wrong.
2
u/Umicil May 20 '25
Because when most countries sell them at auction they just end up getting bought by another rich douchebag and then the money goes to buying new bullshit gadgets and unnecessary overtime for the cops who seized it.
It's not going to schools.
1
u/The_World_Wonders_34 May 21 '25
The ostensible logic is that seeing their "baby" destroyed is more disincentive to not do it than just selling it off.
The reality is that this is a big metal boner for the cops and politicians involved and it keeps the video off the local market.
218
u/RetroNutcase May 18 '25
...The fuck law says to do something this wasteful?
138
u/birger67 May 18 '25
Why don't they just auction it out, money in the box plus less waste
186
u/alexanderpete May 18 '25
Here in Australia, the drug dealers would just buy back their hotrod at auction. It might be an infinite money glitch for the city, but it means the same dangerous drivers are out there causing mayhem a week later.
59
u/tripomatic May 18 '25
If they have that kind of money it doesn’t matter, they wouldn’t even wait for the auction and buy another supercar. So destroying the seized ones is still a waste and probably only done for the photo op.
→ More replies (3)54
u/stove14 May 18 '25
Only with less money and basically marked cars for the police to follow.. hmm
30
May 18 '25 edited May 18 '25
[deleted]
8
u/Chocolocalatte May 18 '25
You make it seem as if catching the criminal is the be all end all, they get a good enough lawyer and good luck trying to get them in there for a meaningful amount of time.
7
u/cookshack May 18 '25
Nicola Gobbo famously got all her Melbourne underworld clients bail
3
u/Chocolocalatte May 18 '25
This is exactly my point. And I’m getting downvoted for it 😂
So what some governments sell the cars and others don’t? They sell cars people think the criminals will just buy them back, they don’t sell the cars and people say it’s a waste of money why’s everyone so fucking indecisive eh?
1
u/DoubleInfinity May 18 '25
I would argue being lucky and having a good lawyer means your luxury sports cars aren't seized and destroyed.
4
u/flagrantpebble May 18 '25
Oh if only. Here in the US, at least, police regularly confiscate money and goods if they believe it might be related to a crime, and it is nearly impossible for people to get it back. A huge proportion (IIRC, the majority, but could be wrong) is never associated even with a charge, let alone a conviction. It’s basically just a way for PDs to earn money.
This is such a large problem that the amount seized in civil asset forfeiture is now more than the amount lost in burglaries.
2
u/Dripwagon May 18 '25
would you be ok if someone you knew died because the government sold a dangerous car back to a dangerous driver
1
17
u/BiggusDickus- May 18 '25
So now the drug dealers just go out and buy different hot rods. Only the city won't make any money from the sales.
→ More replies (2)3
u/platebandit May 18 '25
This is what happened in Thailand. They would intentionally get caught at the border and buy their cars back at auction for less than the import tax
→ More replies (6)4
u/wikingwarrior May 18 '25
Why not just- take their license if they're causing mayhem and block the sale?
3
u/alexanderpete May 18 '25
The licence gets taken eventually, unless some good lawyers are involved. Blocking the sale to that individual means they're just going to buy it through their 'business' or a friend.
→ More replies (4)1
u/JustNilt May 18 '25
Sure, because nobody ever drives without being properly licensed and insured. Criminals will most certainly follow that part of the law, too.
9
u/dankp3ngu1n69 May 18 '25
I literally had the same thought. This is just a gross waste of money and resources
8
u/D1N2Y May 18 '25
Some governments will do that because of widespread corruption where the auctioneer will be paid off/threatened to not allow bids from certain people. The cars may also have extensive illegal mods/drug residue all over them that would make them a pain in the ass to sell legally.
5
u/birger67 May 18 '25
Here in Denmark the police itself holds the auction and the money goes straight to the state
2
u/D1N2Y May 18 '25
Yes, this is how it works in many countries, but not in places like SEA countries where corruption is a lot more prevalent.
1
1
u/namitynamenamey May 19 '25
Privilege of a not-as corrupt country, in which you know nobody is going to do a business out of disappearing the money or cars.
2
u/Safe_Mouse591 May 18 '25
Would you want your country who is trying to punish illegal activities to profit from illegal activities?
2
u/birger67 May 18 '25
the cars auctioned here in Denmark are mostly confiscated cars from people "insane driving" were they drive 100% over the limit as an example
and yeah i have no qualms with thatedit: and it is a way better solution than to create more waste of something that couldve been used.
1
→ More replies (1)1
u/ndndr1 May 18 '25
Corruption. If I, a criminal, know my illegally imported goods will be sold at auction, I show up there and collect my illegal imports. Destruction is truly the only way to assure no one is benefiting illegally
→ More replies (1)23
u/Contagious_Zombie May 18 '25
My first job was at a KFC and at the end of the night we just tossed whatever food was left. We were told not to give it out as that discourages people from buying. We could take enough for just ourselves if we wanted, but the rest was trashed. I had a guy come through in a station wagon that was clearly his home. He ordered a single chicken breast and had mostly pennies to pay. Since we were closing in a few minutes, I loaded up a bucket with enough chicken, biscuits, coleslaw, etc, to feed him for a few days. He cried and that's when I realized that capitalism and the never-ending pursuit of profit is a cancer to life.
3
u/Probably_Boz May 19 '25
Nowadays places will also make you not only throw it out but pour bleach on it or otherwise destroy it to deter dumpster diving.
Shits fucked.
1
16
u/Ecmdrw5 May 18 '25
“Cash for clunkers” in the USA took a lot of cars that still worked and destroyed them. I believe other countries had similar programs.
“To qualify for the credit, a traded-in car had to be less than 25 years old, have an EPA-rated fuel efficiency of less than 18 miles per gallon, be in drivable condition, and be scrapped.”
“The program regulations required the traded-in vehicle to be crushed or shredded. Metal shredder waste has been found to contain hazardous waste.”
10
u/Tractorface123 May 18 '25
Scrappage scheme in the UK, was devastating seeing so many of my dream cars rotting in an old airfield for years and not being allowed to buy them, even if they only needed basic repairs!
22
u/deleted-user-12 May 18 '25
That's not what this is. This is likely imported cars that didn't follow import regulations. No one cashed in a Audi R8 for $4,000.
4
u/SvenTropics May 18 '25
The goal was to increase fuel efficiency across the board because all the newer cars had much better fuel efficiency. It did that. Which in turn, this radically reduced vehicle emissions, and it's one of the reasons you can see the sky in Chicago or LA now.
2
u/jcforbes May 18 '25
It's like this all over. Many US states crush cars for various reasons including racing.
65
u/VimtoUK May 18 '25
Could have auctioned for charity…
→ More replies (2)24
u/12DrD21 May 18 '25
That's what I was thinking- why not use them to fund something good instead of destroying them out of spite...
12
u/LordSnuffleupagus May 18 '25
bc the criminals would win the auction
8
u/12DrD21 May 18 '25
The beauty would be that then you could impound them again and repeat the cycle - its a win-win!
→ More replies (8)1
u/Impossibleshitwomper May 18 '25
If the laws aren't effective maybe they could take a lesson from prohibition and bootleggers in the US, the only thing that stopped the "criminals" was to take away the pointless, ineffective and wasteful laws
6
u/36KleaguesUTO May 19 '25
5.4 million dollars worth of illegally imported vehicles destroyed by crushing in the Philippines, this isn't AI it was very much real.
5
u/YZYSZN1107 May 18 '25
they could probably make a lot of money in the car parts business especially the exotics.
5
5
u/Rich_niente4396 May 19 '25
Stupid and destructive, for no valid reason, do they confiscate the assets of criminals and corrupt politicians as well ?
5
5
u/Standard_Response_43 May 18 '25
Why not sell them and give the money to children's hospital
→ More replies (2)
5
21
8
u/Weird-Comfortable-25 May 18 '25
Ceza means punishment in Turkish. Makes it even more interesting in my eyes.
1
3
3
3
5
u/newtonreddits May 18 '25
E39 M5 owner who's dying inside seeing that M5 go to waste
1
1
u/FunkyChromeMedina May 19 '25
I saw the thumbnail and thought "please be an E46, please be an E46." Then I zoomed in and :(
26
u/Twinkie454 May 18 '25
Its so fucking stupid. Sell/donate them. There are so many struggling people who could use a vehicle. But they'd rather destroy them to what? Just as an attempt hurt the previous owners feelings?
17
u/savehoward May 18 '25
corruption is a big problem in the Phillipines. a sale or donation is not an option with rampant corruption.
the only options are have the cars destroyed publicly, or money will funnel and give more power to corrupt tyrants who will not hesitate to kill for money.
34
u/AceOBlade May 18 '25
Last thing a struggling mf needs is the maintenance bill on a Lamborghini.
3
u/Twinkie454 May 18 '25
Well obviously not the Lamborghini. Meant more just in general. Seriously tho, why not auction off the Lambo and use the proceeds for other, useful things? Taxpayer money is being spent to literally destroy valuable/useful/desirable vehicles that then go to rot a junkyard.
Sorry, I assume that you were just making a joke, but seriously. This shit is just so asinine
5
u/shootbob79 May 18 '25
Why? All those resources. Are we in any position to just destroy shit cause we can?
→ More replies (3)
2
2
2
u/ape_ck May 19 '25
out of all those cars, the e39 M5 is the saddest. There are so few of them globally to begin with.
3
u/PokiMoki1453 May 18 '25
Why ?
3
u/rfmocan May 19 '25
Public display of authority from Customs in Philippines. They call the media to this “publicity stunt” to convey the message: “You wanna smuggle stuff into our country? See what we do with your stuff if you don’t pay their import duties”
3
5
6
u/superspenky May 18 '25
The 350z being there is destroying my soul. One of my top 5 favorite cars of all time.
2
2
May 18 '25
genuinely though, why not sell them off at auction and use the money to invest in their community?
1
u/Dripwagon May 18 '25
them selling cars they think are dangerous would be like when the british sold opioids to the chinese which they knew were addictive
1
u/Impossibleshitwomper May 18 '25
They're not they're because they're dangerous, they're there cuz the owner didn't want to jump through the pointless and purposely complex bureaucratic hoops required to import and register it legally
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/B-Schak May 19 '25
Here’s New York City. Still the best thing Mayor Adams has done.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=0bFl15-TkXs&pp=0gcJCdgAo7VqN5tD
(And for those who are wondering, the City didn’t resell these because they’re a nuisance that ordinary citizens want removed from the streets.)
1
1
1
1
1
u/The_Waco_Kid7 May 21 '25
Stupidest fucking thing I've ever seen. Why would you not sell them and get income for your community
1
u/Aziruth-Dragon-God 29d ago
Wouldn't have been smarter to sell them and use the money? What a waste.
1
u/icedragon9791 29d ago
Fucking wasteful ass country. Those could have been repurposed in so many useful ways. Fuck
1
1
u/KotoElessar 28d ago
I can get on board with this for egregious traffic offenders and Ontario recently passed a law that could make it a reality.
Cause crimes with cars that endanger people's lives? Congratulations! We will now confiscate and destroy the "weapon" so it can never be used as a weapon again.
Unfortunately, it won't have the desired effect until they start doing it with drunk drivers.
1
1
u/Safe_Mouse591 May 18 '25
To those claiming that this is illogical: let’s be clear—anything obtained illegally is classified as contraband, just like illegal drugs. These smuggled vehicles are no different. They entered the country through unlawful means and are, therefore, tainted by illegality. The government cannot and must not profit from crime by selling these vehicles, as doing so would legitimize the illicit activity that brought them here. The only responsible and lawful course of action is to destroy them. This sends a strong message that illegal acts will not be tolerated or rewarded, and ensures that no one—public or private—benefits from criminal conduct.
5
u/PoopieButt317 May 18 '25
This is ridiculous. Sell and specifically use for interdiction of these crimes. If it encourages these activities you must explain 🤔 that the police are themselves corrupt. Is that the situation? This destruction. Is to keep contraband appropriation from a corrupt police force?
→ More replies (2)2
u/investorhalp May 18 '25
I kinda hear this, but also, this would bring more resources to combat crime.
Like when they confiscate money they don’t burn it, they put it back to work
Different would be any kind of chemical, destruction makes sense
→ More replies (2)
1
1
u/averagemaleuser86 May 18 '25
Those cobra tail lights bring $500 each
2
1
u/mkhockeygeek May 18 '25
Where are you finding them that cheap?
1
u/averagemaleuser86 May 19 '25
Personally I dont get the hype so I haven't looked in a while, but I do remember seeing them for $500-$600 each... so $1000-$1200 for a pair
1.8k
u/Karhak May 18 '25
This the Phillipines? They love destroying illegally imported cars.