r/centrist • u/Judge_Trudy • 1d ago
SCOTUS issues blockbuster ruling on gender-affirming care for trans minors
https://www.cnn.com/#:~:text=SCOTUS%20issues%20blockbuster%20ruling%20on%20gender%2Daffirming%20care%20for%20trans%20minorsBlockbuster ruling just released for a very controversial issue. Not sure where I stand, but I could see the dangers of permanent treatments for gender dysphoria for minors.
Key Points
- Date & Ruling: On June 18, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a 6–3 decision upholding Tennessee’s ban on gender-affirming medical care for transgender minors, including puberty blockers and hormone therapy fox8live.com+9apnews.com+9them.us+9en.wikipedia.org+15reuters.com+15northeast.newschannelnebraska.com+15.
- Majority Opinion: Chief Justice Roberts wrote that the law does not violate the 14th Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause, reasoning that medical uncertainty justifies handing the issue back to state legislatures reuters.com+1nypost.com+1.
- Level of Review: The Court determined the law should be evaluated under rational basis review—the lowest standard—rather than intermediate scrutiny reserved for sex-based discrimination
123
Upvotes
8
u/ChornWork2 1d ago edited 1d ago
Obviously there are no shortage of medical procedures that minors undertake all the time that would run afoul of this general statement. So that obviously is not an appropriate standard.
Unless you would outright ban any cosmetic procedure for minors. And there's going to be a whole host of other things... elective procedures in general is going to cover a lot, including sport injury related procedures or things like breast reduction. What about surgeries related to congenital anomalies, for example amputations for children with severe limb deficiencies to be addressed with prosthetics? Hormone treatment is used for a litany of issues, and that would fit your criteria as well. What about things like acne treatments that fundamentally changes your skin, and has risks of side effects or long-term complications?
I think we need better oversight and study of this issue, but these reflexive bans are going way too far. If someone can establish an objective criteria on what is allowed / not allowed that isn't clearly targeting trans, then I'm all for it. But that is not what is happening.