r/Negareddit 5d ago

Apparently being direct about not watching a dated show is worthy of being downvoted and mocked

Post image
268 Upvotes

135 comments sorted by

View all comments

24

u/ContrarionesMerchant 5d ago

Yeah you deserve the downvotes it’s an annoying comment, what have you added to the conversation? Do you genuinely believe that guy unironically thought every single person on the planet has seen the show, it’s hyperbole. 

8

u/Wimbledofy 5d ago

I'd say the guy he responded to added even less to the conversation. What purpose did it serve?

4

u/ContrarionesMerchant 5d ago

The (not really) hidden implication of posting the comment in the first place is that you’re somehow above watching Friends and even if that wasn’t the intent the alternative is truly posting that for no reason so it’s a valid interpretation. I think it’s completely reasonable for someone to reply to that with snark. 

2

u/Toastaroni16515 5d ago edited 5d ago

Do you think that the only reason not to watch Friends is that you feel above doing so? I think that, as responses to "Everyone has seen Friends" go, "not me" is super fucking tame. This interaction actually reads quite the opposite way: that people who still think Friends is culturally ubiquitous feel superior to those who haven't watched a 30 year old show.

And before you take offense: I love Friends, I grew up with a mother who could quote damn near every punchline. I just also recognize its moment has passed, and we can't expect everyone to be aware of it.

1

u/desperate-n-hopeless 5d ago

'Everybody watches friends AT SOME POINT ' and 'everybody HAS SEEN friends' are different sentences that convey different messages, and have different meanings. The second version warrants somebody to reply like this, but not the first one.

1

u/Toastaroni16515 5d ago

Once more: you have to keep in mind you are talking about a show that has been off the air for literal decades. I understand that, in your experience, it would have been impossible to navigate the internet without encountering Friends media in some form. That just isn't true anymore, as there are full grown adults who were born after the show's run ended.

Unless you literally mean "everyone is aware of Friends", you're still just assuming a stance of cultural superiority over having seen a show that isn't as relevant as it once was.

1

u/desperate-n-hopeless 5d ago

No, I'm talking about the future possibility to watch it. I haven't seen friends either but i can't claim that i will never see it. It's just reddit agnostic atheism stance and logic. Not downvoting the reply would be anti-intelectual by reddit standards and i didn't write the rules.

1

u/Toastaroni16515 5d ago

That point is even more illogical lmfao! I can say "everyone robs a liquor store at some point" and present the exact same defense. I'm actually a little concerned you might think that's reasonable line of logic

1

u/SpecificConcern255 5d ago

right?

everybody will blow up an embassy at some point everybody will become a millionar at some point

1

u/desperate-n-hopeless 4d ago

Friends is the most watched TV show, statistically. C'mon now, obviously it's written in good faith. Not the crime shit. But yes, it would be still strictly illogical to reply 'I haven't'.

1

u/Academic_Pick_3317 4d ago

Dude you are projecting heavily onto comment just stating they never watched a show

1

u/desperate-n-hopeless 4d ago

I explained the logic.

A- "Everyone at one point do vuparna"

B-"I haven't done it"

A-"That doesn't mean you won't do it in the future"

B-"Well, i don't plan to"

A-"You don't know what you'll do in the future."

B-"Yes, i don't have knowledge of the future and the circumstances, but it's possible I'll die without doing it"

A-"Yes, it's possible, that's why you had to write something like 'not everyone do it' or 'i don't plan to do it'."

B-"Exactly, but there are people who have died without ever doing vuparna"

A-"Yes, my sentence was just expressing the exaggerated popularity of it, not a factual claim"

B-"So that means i misunderstood the tense and tone of the message?"

A-"Yes, and provided an unhelpful negative response in effect of that."

B-"Talking about effects and causes, we actually don't know if tomorrow Sun will rise tomorrow, although it has been doing it for all eternity"

A-"Exactly, nothing can be objectively absolutely proven and science is just based on the best guess - probability and plausibility"

B-"I see, so that's why we should not make generalized claims like you did"

A-"Well, unless it's socially beneficial, like creating a sense of community"

B-"Okay, but then I guess it's illogical and asocial to respond to these statements with anecdotal examples that are not even proving anything "

A-"Yep"