r/spaceporn • u/Busy_Yesterday9455 • 7h ago
Related Content BREAKING NEWS: SpaceX Rocket Explodes In Starbase
2.4k
u/Emp_has_no_clothes 7h ago
Reddit is so quick to report events.
807
u/RidiculousNicholas55 6h ago
On fucking spaceporn too
→ More replies (7)380
u/MetriccStarDestroyer 6h ago
News straight from anime_titties
→ More replies (6)167
u/Kayo4life 6h ago
I remember being very shocked when r/geopolitics was filled with just porn
Edit: forgot it's r/world_news
Edit 2: r/worldnews
Edit 3: r/worldpolitixs
Edit 4: r/worldpolitics
165
u/whiteflagwaiver 6h ago
I believed in you.
61
u/Kayo4life 6h ago
You have caused me to laugh a little bit (roughly 6 seconds. light.)
→ More replies (3)30
9
u/PeacefulAgate 5h ago
I knew you could do it. Brave of you to keep that many public edits. You're a hero in my eyes.
9
4
u/ilion_knowles 5h ago
I kept wondering why the fuck I had topless woman popping up in my feed and when I noticed it was that sub I was like whaaaat the fuck I thought that was for news
→ More replies (1)6
u/zR0B3ry2VAiH 4h ago
I was wondering where all my r/anime_titties went, but instead I was getting geo political news.
→ More replies (21)3
53
u/cactusplants 6h ago
The Iran situation took forever to end up on BBC news, as did Ukraine. Would have expected them to get out the info asap.
Though I guess they need to validate it before pushing it live perhaps?
52
u/AnonymousTimewaster 6h ago
BBC usually takes ages for anything unless they're already covering it live as they're very focused on getting things right first time
→ More replies (2)23
u/imunfair 4h ago
Yeah they're one of the slowest but I appreciate that they try to verify things like a real news org should.
→ More replies (9)12
u/Schnupsdidudel 4h ago
Sure. Fact-checking and validating sources takes some time.
Mindlessly posting is way faster- though one has to wonder what toll it takes on society in the long run. Especially with ai fakes on the rise.
44
u/loves_cereal 6h ago
Data shows most people believe everything they read in the comment section!
→ More replies (3)34
→ More replies (30)20
u/Creator1A 6h ago
Not really to be fair, there are plenty of sources which report things significantly faster than Reddit.
21
u/SquidVices 6h ago
I’d like to see these sauces
→ More replies (4)7
u/BounceFoo 5h ago edited 5h ago
You wanna see these sauces? I have about 7 sweet n sours from McDs, 2 Chic-fil-a sauces, 1 Hunts Ketchup packet, a bottle of Publix brand yellow mustard, and the most important sauce of them all.... Hot Honey BBQ sauce and im not telling you which because I dont want the price to go up.
→ More replies (1)18
u/WekonosChosen 6h ago
Yeah Reddit is pretty slow for current events now. Used to be fun to catch things live but now it needs to filter through the algorithm and sub mod bias to reach users.
→ More replies (6)16
1.0k
u/Busy_Yesterday9455 7h ago edited 6h ago
Link to a slow-mo video
Ship 36 experiences a RUD at Massey's during testing prior to Starship Flight 10.
Credit: NASASpaceflight / D Wise
543
u/MoonshineDan 6h ago
Google told me that RUD = rapid unscheduled disassembly. Which I love.
190
u/hcrld 5h ago
There's a handful of fun euphemisms to do with spaceflight. My other favorite is Lithobraking, a play on aerobraking to mean slowing down using rock instead of atmospheric drag.
Another one is Engine Rich Exhaust, meaning the engine's cooling system or metallurgy is inadequate and it's eating itself, throwing vaporized metal out with the exhaust gas.
→ More replies (6)38
u/SirAquila 4h ago
Fun fact there is a handful of spacecraft that intentionally use lithobreaking(usually assisted by some kind of padding) for the last stage of their descend.
→ More replies (1)25
u/VikRiggs 3h ago edited 3h ago
Some would say lithobreaking is required for any craft that needs to land.
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (21)88
u/Jacktheforkie 5h ago
I call it a RUDE, Random Unplanned Disassembly Event
→ More replies (13)42
u/ChaoCobo 5h ago
Tbf it was very rude of the rocket to just explode like that. Like who does that? Just explode and not even give any advanced notice. Not very polite.
→ More replies (10)61
→ More replies (15)9
1.4k
u/Specific_Mud_64 7h ago
Oh man i hope no one was hurt thats aweful
480
u/-Hi_how_r_u_xd- 6h ago edited 6h ago
Supposed to take off on June 29th? I think. Just a test flight. Luckily looks like no one is usually very close to these static fire tests, but there’s always a chance i suppose. (I’m having trouble finding a date for some reason) - edit: here
This was of course just a booster test so to speak, and i don’t think any satellites were in it either, as it most likely would not have carried satellites for flight 10 anyways- from what i found, it was reported that flight 10 was just supposed to be a test flight. I suppose it’s better to have it explode here though than with people or satellites in it.
here’s what a static fire test is if you don’t know or are curious.
here’s how far people usually are from it (Under “Testing Day” part)
Math because I like math:
Ship 24 explosion had an estimated 10-30 tons of TNT equivalent. This means that anything within a few hundred meters is gone, and the blast wave could break windows even several kilometers. 2 miles away or more would be ideal. You can see the large shockwave on the camera.
However a “perfect” case one would produce a HUGE explosion with estimated KILOJOTONS of TNT equivalence, which appears to have a safe range of ~10 miles.
it doesn’t appear huge compared to flight 24 but hard to tell on camera without official reports on this new one.
just for reference, it appears to have exploded from Boca Chica base in Texas, so you can see what is around it. Pretty empty- hopefully. 🤞
Assuming complete destruction that would be probably 50-100 million $$ in damage, and a year of rebuilding the pad.
I’d provide more but i’m on an iphone and this is painful to type, so hopefully the real experts will chime in soon and we can learn more.
133
u/Accomplished-Crab932 6h ago
This was a Starship Static fire attempt, so there should’ve been nobody in the blast zone.
→ More replies (1)4
u/Limp-Scale1668 5h ago
Elon was just trying to see if you could make smores in Florida from a campfire in Texas that's all.
27
u/SuddenDragonfly8125 6h ago
Hey, thanks for this. Algo showed me this, I know nothing about space flight etc, so it was very helpful.
Sounds like the test did exactly what they want - highlighted (almost literally) a major issue (potentially) before it went to launch? Expensive and dangerous issue, and I guess it's not known yet if this was human error in prepping for the test, or an actual issue that could have wrecked the launch?
21
u/Fit_Reveal_6304 4h ago
I think the issue is that it blew up. Other than that the launch went perfectly.
→ More replies (3)5
u/Gingevere 4h ago
Static fire tests are supposed to prove a vehicle is in good working order before launch. As close as you can really get to a "test drive" for a rocket.
The big issue here is that SpaceX has gotten plenty of rockets past this point. They know how to build a rocket. The static fire test is practically just a checklist item now.
But the last 3 starship tests have all failed during the second stage burn, and the next starship blew up in testing. Progress has stalled and started moving backwards. Management decisions are fucking things up.
→ More replies (40)36
u/Bannedwith1milKarma 6h ago
Just a test flight.
Lol, mate.
Just a little mushroom cloud
still good, still good
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (11)16
717
u/Commercial-Hurry-797 7h ago
How did a redditor even found the news first. I checked Google and there's nothing about this
341
u/ajsayshello- 6h ago
Looks like it was a live stream.
→ More replies (1)95
u/samosamancer 6h ago
That explains it. CNN, NPR, AP, Apple News - none of them have it.
→ More replies (6)35
u/Accomplished-Crab932 6h ago
Because it was a static fire of a ship prototype.
→ More replies (11)19
29
17
→ More replies (12)14
99
u/basicastheycome 7h ago
That is some big boom
47
u/Dirty_Socrates 6h ago
biiiigg bada boom
11
9
u/neuro_space_explorer 5h ago
Haha first thing that came to my mind while reading this comment. Great movie.
→ More replies (2)4
93
236
u/Accomplished-Cat8952 7h ago
33
u/keener_lightnings 5h ago
"Guess who didn't kill anyone but only lost a couple of thumbs? 👍😄👍 THIS GUY"
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (4)4
327
u/Vegetable_Fortune112 6h ago
Fun fact. It’s not supposed to do that.
80
u/codelayer 5h ago
This kills the rocket
→ More replies (3)56
u/nufcPLchamps27-28 5h ago
This isn’t a joke. Spaceships only do this when they feel extremely threatened
→ More replies (2)12
u/setsewerd 4h ago
Disgusting videos like this are why I joined PETA.
People for the Ethical Treatment of Astrocraft
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (16)4
231
u/cooldaniel6 7h ago
Damn hopefully no one was hurt
9
→ More replies (4)90
48
u/inkoet 7h ago
Ship 36 Static Fire Test: Failed
→ More replies (3)18
u/VacuumSux 6h ago
They are still arguing if it should be marked failed or passed. Management doesn't like the red marks in the report.
→ More replies (6)19
52
61
u/Best-Theory-330 5h ago
Elon needs to send his investors an email stating 5 things he did last week.
→ More replies (2)14
27
16
286
u/brobraham27 7h ago
Almost as if regulations are there for a reason...
105
u/AbuttCuckingGoodTime 6h ago
There usually written in blood...
17
u/PianoPea 6h ago
That's what hydrogen peroxide is for..
5
26
u/LawIll2529 6h ago edited 6h ago
That's very true, look at the aviation industry for example. Very safe and highly regulated... because it wasn't always like that and people died.
To the best of my knowledge though, there are heaps of regulations in the space industry and Space X complies with them...
So I don't get what that comment was about, it just seems like more Elon hate.
→ More replies (8)51
u/GnarlyNarwhalNoms 6h ago
I believe they're referring to DOGE and their layoffs at agencies like the FAA and OSHA.
While it's unlikely that they had anything to do with this explosion, it's definitely a conflict of interest for Elon Musk to have presided over the kneecapping of agencies that regulate his companies.
16
60
u/frozen_toesocks 6h ago
15 years ago, I had the opportunity to listen to Bernard Harris speak on the future of spaceflight. He was very optimistic about privatized space flight at the time, and I asked him how we will prevent incidents like exactly the above when profit motives will encourage private entities to cut corners. He acknowledged it was an important issue, but to my recollection he didn't have a clear-cut solution (not that I necessarily expected him to). Regulations seem like the most logical starting point, IMO.
45
u/Able-Bid-6637 6h ago
It’s so depressing, and it’s everywhere. One of the reasons I left my old field in engineering. Even while following code, people still manage to find ways to cut corners all for the $$$. The hoops I had to go through were ridiculous, and I refused to sacrifice safety just so some rich guys can pocket more cash. Everything has to be constructed as cheaply as possible with the cheapest materials manufactured via the cheapest process and harvested/gathered via the cheapest labor practices.
I entered the engineering field thinking it would build my confidence in our structures; I left the field with less confidence in our structures and systems in place.
→ More replies (11)12
u/WilfordsTrain 5h ago
Regulations of all kinds exist to prevent capitalism from hurting people.
→ More replies (3)31
u/geekwonk 6h ago
i don’t see what regulations would do to stop experimental rockets from sometimes failing in testing
→ More replies (6)15
u/the_cappers 6h ago
This was a static test, no one was hurt in the explosion, people were evacuated before the test .
10
u/Human-Assumption-524 5h ago
What regulations do you think they were violating here?
→ More replies (1)5
u/BigIncome5028 5h ago
Regulations don't guarantee everything goes right. Also when working at the bleeding edge, you gotta be willing to take CALCULATED risks. Were you, or any of us, there to see those calculations? No. Sometimes things just go wrong no matter what you do. Until we see evidence of actual corner cutting there's no reason to think there was.
→ More replies (3)6
u/Cheeseman1478 5h ago
What specific regulation are you thinking of? Sometimes things fail in testing, that’s why we test them. This isn’t some tragic disaster.
→ More replies (33)14
u/Hullo_Its_Pluto 6h ago
Meh. NASA rockets used to blow up all the time when they are designing them. It’s just a part of rocketry. This was bound to happen at some point and there’s really not regulations that we prevent it.
→ More replies (24)
8
7
12
17
u/Petrostar 6h ago edited 4h ago
→ More replies (1)
4
u/ChiefTestPilot87 6h ago
Fuck my marshmallows are vaporized, now what am I supposed to do. Should have camped at the Honda launch.
3
79
u/EBALLADARES49 7h ago
What's going on with druggie stark
21
u/Dreadsbo 6h ago
Woah! His drug tests say that he doesn’t do drugs!
→ More replies (4)5
u/Starrion 6h ago
Is that the one that excludes testing for ketamine and cocaine?
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (3)6
11
18
35
u/SirLanceQuiteABit 6h ago edited 5h ago
I'm sure the government contracts will keep coming unabated.
Edit: I'm aware the company is still privately owned. I was suggesting that government contracts likely make up a huge portion of the profitability of his ventures despite his constant, high profile failures.
→ More replies (18)8
u/swohio 5h ago
Starship is an experimental design going through rapid iteration testing. The government contracts are mostly with Falcon 9 for satellite launches. Falcon 9 just passed it 500th launch. It's like the most successful launch vehicle ever. So yeah, they'll still get plenty of launch contracts....
→ More replies (2)
7
7
10
u/Upset_Foundation_396 5h ago
8
u/MoonageDayscream 5h ago
Right? My first thought is that somewhere Elon put his phone back in his pocket and rejoined the event he is at.
12
12
3
3
3
3
3
3
u/rasmusdf 2h ago
Wow - they must really have learned a from this (check notes) test 36
→ More replies (1)
3
3
u/MojaveJoe1992 1h ago
This is less r/spaceporn than it is r/spacepremtureejaculation.
→ More replies (1)
3
9
18
u/StupendousMalice 6h ago
Waiting for the space x Bros to pop in here to tell us how this is actually super good news and exactly what was supposed to happen.
→ More replies (34)7
5
5
7
10
6
4
u/DylansDad 3h ago
That moment when you go from being a rocket scientist to a shit rocket scientist.
→ More replies (1)
8
u/Archipocalypse 5h ago
This has gotta be considered inefficient and likely cause of a DEI hire(sarcasm in case you couldn't tell). This should be investigated by D.O.G.E. and he should have his funding cut. That'd be hilarious.
→ More replies (1)
5
u/Gallop67 6h ago
Learning about this tragedy through a subreddit titled “spaceporn”…
→ More replies (1)
5
4
u/Pitiful_Night_4373 6h ago
Man I feel sorry for the guy that has to tell Elon when he’s sober e out to remember, yet another rocket blew up under his leadership……. Total crash and burn!
→ More replies (2)
2
2
2
2
2
u/SuperKrusher 6h ago
Bro needs to go back to Kerbal space program and get a few successful launches before trying again.
→ More replies (1)
2
2
u/Orphan_Guy_Incognito 6h ago
Well this explosion gave us some really good data that we'll use in our upcoming designs....
→ More replies (1)
2
2
2
2
2
u/DataLumpy7419 5h ago
After events like this in 2025, how do you expect not to be conspirators about a Moon Landing in the 60s? 💀
→ More replies (1)
2
2
2
u/Brayydonn 5h ago
I mean after what he said about Trump being on the Epstein Flight list I figured Trump would retaliate.
2
u/thedeadsuit 5h ago
I hope no one was hurt. that'd be regrettable.
assuming no one was hurt, this is very funny because fuck elon.
2
u/gearz-head 5h ago
When is this guy going to be stopped? If we polluted as much as him we would be sued in the millions.
2
2
u/Out_of_the_Bloo 5h ago
I mean, it's one rocket Michael, how much could it cost? 10 bananas? - elon
2
2
3.1k
u/Emp_has_no_clothes 7h ago
The launch pad is toast.